Good analogy, that spread offense might be fun to watch but when they play Alabama they get murdered

My 'hypothetical' analogy would be a little different... we all like to relate fishing to golf (even though the money is vastly different).. over the years you would hear rumblings and there would be a few tournaments that would use the Stableford scoring for golf (ex. 1pt for a bogie, 2 pts for a par, 3 points for a birdie, etc..) basically you are not overly penalized for a blowing up on a hole and the highest score would win. I could easily see the argument some people could make that it would make the game more exciting.. it would make players be much more aggressive with their shots (thus more entertaining) and it would be in a scoring format that is easier for the 'non-golfer' to follow....

Now if 90% of best golfers decide to join a new tour that focused on this new scoring... how bitter would the golf purest be? would they still watch their favorite players or would they watch their favorite format? or would they buy in and start using Stableford scoring when they are playing with their friends... i honestly dont know.

Many of us are purest, and we prefer the format over the anglers.. at least i do. but i will watch all three.. it just really hit home last weekend when i had the option to watch MLF's "superbowl" vs a BASS regular season event and i primarily watched BASS..

You are right. BPT only got 78 of the top 90 professional fishermen from FLW and BASS.
[/quote]
Another Kool-Aid drinker. I guess you're right if you count the half of those 78 that haven't performed in 10 years, were about to have to re-qualify and were in a bind over the actual enforcement of the no information rules.

You are right. BPT only got 78 of the top 90 professional fishermen from FLW and BASS.
[/quote]
Another Kool-Aid drinker. I guess you're right if you count the half of those 78 that haven't performed in 10 years, were about to have to re-qualify and were in a bind over the actual enforcement of the no information rules. [/quote]



......wait for it.....wait for it......wait....for....it! (Where’s that in writing? I wanna see it!)

^^^^^^you know its coming^^^^^^

The correct answer to the original OG questions is, all of them. Enjoy watching them all. You guys sound like a bunch of 7th grade girls.

[/quote]



......wait for it.....wait for it......wait....for....it! (Where’s that in writing? I wanna see it!)

^^^^^^you know its coming^^^^^^[/quote]
Hey Steez, why isn't Ott Defoe's show called, "The Hunt for a whole bunch of 1+ Pound Fish" ?

Cayuga.

Those first 2 days they were strumming em good. An 8lber in New York is a toad

just watch both at the same time.

Elite Series on Cayuga, hands down. It was awesome. The most I watched of the Redcrest was the replay of Edwin's fury.

The Red Crest hands down, some excellent close up video of top water action and lots of catching. Watched a little of the BASS, but boring watching cast and retrieve, so switched back to Red Crest. Worth it to see how quick Daniels jerk the hook out of his officials finger. Just mute when Ike’s on. Actually any of the three is better than watching a cornhole tournament. 😋

Told Ya!! Ike will jumps soon. TOO FUNNY

You are one awesome fluker... congrats on your prognostication.

I'll watch both because I love bass fishing but BASS is what I follow closely. As a kid and still to this day I watch BASS to learn. The format they present is informative on how the anglers search for their fish, how they are set-up, bait presentation, etc. With MLF I don't feel their television format is very informative when it comes to the details on how the anglers are catching their fish.