texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
KoreanFishMonger69, MurphJax, saminator01, avences, RevCDale
119192 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
hopalong 121,166
TexDawg 119,857
Bigbob_FTW 95,450
John175☮ 85,924
Pilothawk 83,277
Bob Davis 82,629
Mark Perry 72,516
Derek 🐝 68,322
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,039,138
Posts13,959,786
Members144,192
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? #12699099 04/02/18 12:24 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,581
fivebites Offline OP
TFF Team Angler
OP Offline
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,581
Just purchased new to me boat and upgrading electronics. Going to either a Helix 10 or 12 at the console with side and downscan, but curious as to how many of you actually use sidescan up front at the bow? Downscan is a must there...what say ye?


2019 Chevy Tahoe
2018 Basscat Eyra 250 Proxs
PB Wife of 32 years!
PB Largemouth 9.56 Ray Roberts
Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: fivebites] #12699102 04/02/18 12:27 PM
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 457
dandeeks Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 457
I don't have it up there, but often wish I did. When fishing new ares, how could you not want to know that there's some structure to the left of you? my vote, get it!

Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: fivebites] #12699107 04/02/18 12:31 PM
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 8,383
J
Jpurdue Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
J
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 8,383
Side scan doesn't work well when you are not moving at least a couple mph. You are typically doing that when you have the big motor running. Hence the importance of side scan at the console. Personally I think it's completely unnecessary up front, but far be it from me to tell another man how to waste his money.


"Bragging may not bring happiness, but no man having caught a large fish goes home through an alley." -A.L.

www.LunkerLore.com

Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: Jpurdue] #12699179 04/02/18 01:15 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 16,181
G
grout-scout Online Sleepy
TFF Guru
Online Sleepy
TFF Guru
G
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 16,181
Originally Posted By: Jpurdue
Side scan doesn't work well when you are not moving at least a couple mph. You are typically doing that when you have the big motor running. Hence the importance of side scan at the console. Personally I think it's completely unnecessary up front, but far be it from me to tell another man how to waste his money.


It works fine at slow speeds, but I wouldnt call it necessary. I will always have it though, just because I like it. All graphs are pre-programmed for it now, so its not like youd be spending anymore than normal.


Moving at 0.2mph because of a slight breeze.




Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: fivebites] #12699199 04/02/18 01:25 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 909
F
fwbassman Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
F
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 909
I like seeing the side scan at the bow, but with that being said I didn't want one installed at the bow. I can get a little crazy on the TM. Figured I'd get some really goofy results. So I leave the console running side scan and wireless connect to a tablet up front. Then just run map or 2d on the bow.

Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: Jpurdue] #12699224 04/02/18 01:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,263
M. Alexander Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,263
Originally Posted By: Jpurdue
Side scan doesn't work well when you are not moving at least a couple mph. You are typically doing that when you have the big motor running. Hence the importance of side scan at the console. Personally I think it's completely unnecessary up front, but far be it from me to tell another man how to waste his money.


Mark
Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: fivebites] #12699250 04/02/18 01:51 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,092
B
beartrap Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
B
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,092
several years ago was flipping/pitching a row of boat docks....got couple loops in my line so I pitched the jig out other side of boat away from the docks while I pulled line off my reel to get loops/tangles out....when I picked up on my jig,I realized it was in a brushpile so I jigged it up and down a couple times and caught a 6lb fish...
I'm sure there were many more brushpiles out in front of docks that I never knew was there.....what would be best thing to get so you could spot brushpiles,stumps etc while you were fishing down a bank?
would it be a 360 scan unit?....panoptic?...or just side scan?

Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: fivebites] #12699377 04/02/18 02:42 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,183
C
coachallentca Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
C
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,183
I have panoptix but I don't see many brush piles. I do use it because I can see fish in front of me instaed of under me.

Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: beartrap] #12699410 04/02/18 02:58 PM
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 153
B
Bass_Fanatic Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
B
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 153
Originally Posted By: beartrap
several years ago was flipping/pitching a row of boat docks....got couple loops in my line so I pitched the jig out other side of boat away from the docks while I pulled line off my reel to get loops/tangles out....when I picked up on my jig,I realized it was in a brushpile so I jigged it up and down a couple times and caught a 6lb fish...
I'm sure there were many more brushpiles out in front of docks that I never knew was there.....what would be best thing to get so you could spot brushpiles,stumps etc while you were fishing down a bank?
would it be a 360 scan unit?....panoptic?...or just side scan?

No doubt 360. That is exactly what 360 was made for


Josh Sikes
Bent Rods Guide Service
Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: fivebites] #12699434 04/02/18 03:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,190
Fishinfellow Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,190
In my opinion, Lowrance SideScan at the bow isn't great but it is nice to have if you're fishing deep structure. I had hummbinbird SideScan on the bow of my old boat and it was awesome for fishing deep structure. Basically eliminated the need for tossing buoys out. Neither will show a real crisp sharp image while sitting still but it will show you where stuff structure/cover is.


Thats my money fish
[Linked Image]
Kris Winhold
Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: fivebites] #12699464 04/02/18 03:28 PM
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,340
B
Bobby Milam Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
B
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,340
For me, SI isnt as important to have at the transducer at the bow. I dont mind sharing the back transducer with the bow unit for the SI image. Now I also have a 360. Thats the nice thing about the helixes now. You only need to buy one SI unit and they will display all the other stuff as long as you have one unit capable of SI somewhere.

Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: beartrap] #12699744 04/02/18 06:02 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 16,181
G
grout-scout Online Sleepy
TFF Guru
Online Sleepy
TFF Guru
G
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 16,181
Originally Posted By: beartrap
several years ago was flipping/pitching a row of boat docks....got couple loops in my line so I pitched the jig out other side of boat away from the docks while I pulled line off my reel to get loops/tangles out....when I picked up on my jig,I realized it was in a brushpile so I jigged it up and down a couple times and caught a 6lb fish...
I'm sure there were many more brushpiles out in front of docks that I never knew was there.....what would be best thing to get so you could spot brushpiles,stumps etc while you were fishing down a bank?
would it be a 360 scan unit?....panoptic?...or just side scan?


I have not used the 360, but Id have to guess that it would be the best for that.

Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: fivebites] #12699774 04/02/18 06:13 PM
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 297
lucky55 Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 297
I have SI on the bow. I cant seem to get it set right to see anything with TM going, soon as i let off it clears up. I think it would be more useful if I could get it clearer.


2021 SKEETER ZXR-21
Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: lucky55] #12699794 04/02/18 06:23 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,101
W
Wayne P. Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
W
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,101
Originally Posted By: lucky55
I have SI on the bow. I cant seem to get it set right to see anything with TM going, soon as i let off it clears up. I think it would be more useful if I could get it clearer.


Fix your RFI issue.


Helix 12 CHIRP MEGA SI+ GPS G3N and G4N, 1198c SI, SOLIX 10 SI G3,
Helix 8 MEGA SI+ GPS G4N, SOLIX 12 SI and G3, MEGA 360, MEGA LIVE TL, RC-1
Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: Wayne P.] #12699855 04/02/18 07:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,561
J
Jeff From Iowa Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
J
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,561
Originally Posted By: Wayne P.
Originally Posted By: lucky55
I have SI on the bow. I cant seem to get it set right to see anything with TM going, soon as i let off it clears up. I think it would be more useful if I could get it clearer.


Fix your RFI issue.


Easier said than done, there are tons of people with rf interference, most of them with ultrex and helix... mines only on side scan now, Ive spent tons of time trying all the fixes to no avail. it will be clear on 10 power for the ultrex but not 9.. it clearly has something to do with the pulsing of power the ultrex uses.

Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3