texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
noah.j.7, Mike Hall, SOFdude, onlyme, sandeez
119614 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 124,758
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 104,593
Bob Davis 96,456
John175☮ 86,137
Pilothawk 83,925
Mark Perry 74,867
Derek 🐝 68,502
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,057,820
Posts14,291,357
Members144,614
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? #12699099 04/02/18 12:24 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,137
fivebites Offline OP
TFF Team Angler
OP Offline
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,137
Just purchased new to me boat and upgrading electronics. Going to either a Helix 10 or 12 at the console with side and downscan, but curious as to how many of you actually use sidescan up front at the bow? Downscan is a must there...what say ye?


2019 Chevy Tahoe
2018 Basscat Eyra 250 Proxs
PB Wife of 32 years!
PB Largemouth 9.56 Ray Roberts
Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: fivebites] #12699102 04/02/18 12:27 PM
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 457
dandeeks Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 457
I don't have it up there, but often wish I did. When fishing new ares, how could you not want to know that there's some structure to the left of you? my vote, get it!

Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: fivebites] #12699107 04/02/18 12:31 PM
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 8,951
J
Jpurdue Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
J
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 8,951
Side scan doesn't work well when you are not moving at least a couple mph. You are typically doing that when you have the big motor running. Hence the importance of side scan at the console. Personally I think it's completely unnecessary up front, but far be it from me to tell another man how to waste his money.


"Bragging may not bring happiness, but no man having caught a large fish goes home through an alley." -A.L.

www.LunkerLore.com

[Linked Image]
Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: Jpurdue] #12699179 04/02/18 01:15 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 17,867
G
grout-scout Online Sleepy
TFF Guru
Online Sleepy
TFF Guru
G
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 17,867
Originally Posted By: Jpurdue
Side scan doesn't work well when you are not moving at least a couple mph. You are typically doing that when you have the big motor running. Hence the importance of side scan at the console. Personally I think it's completely unnecessary up front, but far be it from me to tell another man how to waste his money.


It works fine at slow speeds, but I wouldnt call it necessary. I will always have it though, just because I like it. All graphs are pre-programmed for it now, so its not like youd be spending anymore than normal.


Moving at 0.2mph because of a slight breeze.




Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: fivebites] #12699199 04/02/18 01:25 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 909
F
fwbassman Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
F
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 909
I like seeing the side scan at the bow, but with that being said I didn't want one installed at the bow. I can get a little crazy on the TM. Figured I'd get some really goofy results. So I leave the console running side scan and wireless connect to a tablet up front. Then just run map or 2d on the bow.

Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: Jpurdue] #12699224 04/02/18 01:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,269
M. Alexander Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,269
Originally Posted By: Jpurdue
Side scan doesn't work well when you are not moving at least a couple mph. You are typically doing that when you have the big motor running. Hence the importance of side scan at the console. Personally I think it's completely unnecessary up front, but far be it from me to tell another man how to waste his money.


Mark
Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: fivebites] #12699250 04/02/18 01:51 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,065
B
beartrap Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
B
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,065
several years ago was flipping/pitching a row of boat docks....got couple loops in my line so I pitched the jig out other side of boat away from the docks while I pulled line off my reel to get loops/tangles out....when I picked up on my jig,I realized it was in a brushpile so I jigged it up and down a couple times and caught a 6lb fish...
I'm sure there were many more brushpiles out in front of docks that I never knew was there.....what would be best thing to get so you could spot brushpiles,stumps etc while you were fishing down a bank?
would it be a 360 scan unit?....panoptic?...or just side scan?

Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: fivebites] #12699377 04/02/18 02:42 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,232
C
coachallentca Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
C
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,232
I have panoptix but I don't see many brush piles. I do use it because I can see fish in front of me instaed of under me.

Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: beartrap] #12699410 04/02/18 02:58 PM
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 154
B
Bass_Fanatic Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
B
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 154
Originally Posted By: beartrap
several years ago was flipping/pitching a row of boat docks....got couple loops in my line so I pitched the jig out other side of boat away from the docks while I pulled line off my reel to get loops/tangles out....when I picked up on my jig,I realized it was in a brushpile so I jigged it up and down a couple times and caught a 6lb fish...
I'm sure there were many more brushpiles out in front of docks that I never knew was there.....what would be best thing to get so you could spot brushpiles,stumps etc while you were fishing down a bank?
would it be a 360 scan unit?....panoptic?...or just side scan?

No doubt 360. That is exactly what 360 was made for


Josh Sikes
Bent Rods Guide Service
Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: fivebites] #12699434 04/02/18 03:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,271
Fishinfellow Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,271
In my opinion, Lowrance SideScan at the bow isn't great but it is nice to have if you're fishing deep structure. I had hummbinbird SideScan on the bow of my old boat and it was awesome for fishing deep structure. Basically eliminated the need for tossing buoys out. Neither will show a real crisp sharp image while sitting still but it will show you where stuff structure/cover is.


Thats my money fish
[Linked Image]
Kris Winhold
Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: fivebites] #12699464 04/02/18 03:28 PM
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,363
B
Bobby Milam Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
B
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,363
For me, SI isnt as important to have at the transducer at the bow. I dont mind sharing the back transducer with the bow unit for the SI image. Now I also have a 360. Thats the nice thing about the helixes now. You only need to buy one SI unit and they will display all the other stuff as long as you have one unit capable of SI somewhere.

Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: beartrap] #12699744 04/02/18 06:02 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 17,867
G
grout-scout Online Sleepy
TFF Guru
Online Sleepy
TFF Guru
G
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 17,867
Originally Posted By: beartrap
several years ago was flipping/pitching a row of boat docks....got couple loops in my line so I pitched the jig out other side of boat away from the docks while I pulled line off my reel to get loops/tangles out....when I picked up on my jig,I realized it was in a brushpile so I jigged it up and down a couple times and caught a 6lb fish...
I'm sure there were many more brushpiles out in front of docks that I never knew was there.....what would be best thing to get so you could spot brushpiles,stumps etc while you were fishing down a bank?
would it be a 360 scan unit?....panoptic?...or just side scan?


I have not used the 360, but Id have to guess that it would be the best for that.

Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: fivebites] #12699774 04/02/18 06:13 PM
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 297
lucky55 Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 297
I have SI on the bow. I cant seem to get it set right to see anything with TM going, soon as i let off it clears up. I think it would be more useful if I could get it clearer.


2021 SKEETER ZXR-21
Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: lucky55] #12699794 04/02/18 06:23 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,160
W
Wayne P. Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
W
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,160
Originally Posted By: lucky55
I have SI on the bow. I cant seem to get it set right to see anything with TM going, soon as i let off it clears up. I think it would be more useful if I could get it clearer.


Fix your RFI issue.


Helix 12 CHIRP MEGA SI+ GPS G4N, SOLIX 10 G3, Helix 15 CHIRP MEGA SI+ GPS G4N,
Helix 8 CHIRP MEGA SI+ GPS G4N, SOLIX 12 G3, MEGA 360, MEGA LIVE TL , MEGA LIVE 2, Xplore 10
Re: sidescan necessary/useful at the bow? [Re: Wayne P.] #12699855 04/02/18 07:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,561
J
Jeff From Iowa Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
J
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,561
Originally Posted By: Wayne P.
Originally Posted By: lucky55
I have SI on the bow. I cant seem to get it set right to see anything with TM going, soon as i let off it clears up. I think it would be more useful if I could get it clearer.


Fix your RFI issue.


Easier said than done, there are tons of people with rf interference, most of them with ultrex and helix... mines only on side scan now, Ive spent tons of time trying all the fixes to no avail. it will be clear on 10 power for the ultrex but not 9.. it clearly has something to do with the pulsing of power the ultrex uses.

Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3