Forums59
Topics1,059,207
Posts14,315,815
Members144,646
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program
[Re: FZ1]
#8127582
10/18/12 07:48 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,120
Troyz
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,120 |
Why limit the program to only certain months of the year. I know the idea is to have the fish spawn in captivity but why not take a fish that is SAL size caught in May or June (or when ever) and put that fish on a special diet that would help ensure healthier/more offspring?
Two reasons. Increased fish mortality in warmer months. It costs LOTS of money to feed BIG bass. Money TPWD doesn't have. I understand the fish mortality part could be an issue to consider although I believe the way the fish are handled are the real problem with the mortality and not sure if the warm water aspect would add to it. I don't see cost as an issue. I keep hearing that SAL is funded by Sponsors and does not cost the state or TPWD anything. Is this not the case? Higher water temperatures = Higher mortality. That is a fact. Higher water temperatures = need for better handling and fish care. That is a fact. Higher water temperatures does not have to = higher mortality rate.
Last edited by Troyz; 10/18/12 07:51 PM.
|
|
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program
[Re: Ken A.]
#8127594
10/18/12 07:52 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 739
T-Gauntt
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 739 |
I'll be happy to donate major $$$ to SAL program, but I need the precise coordinates of this so called "Lake X" first
-Taylor
|
|
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program
[Re: Troyz]
#8127603
10/18/12 07:53 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,338
T54
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,338 |
So which is it? Privately funded or partially privately funded? Have we been misled all these years when we have been told it is not funded by the State? I have no idea, but if you think about operating expenses for vehicles and facilities, accumulated depreciation of state assets, use of state employee time, etc, there is no way that they tally it all up at the end of the year and mail an invoice to Toyota. I am assuming like most sponsorship, Toyota cuts them a check every year for a fixed amount of money. Maybe this $ amount covers everything and then some. They could be making money off the deal, but I really doubt it.
|
|
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program
[Re: Poetfury]
#8127629
10/18/12 07:58 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,053
Fast Lane
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,053 |
CA....10 or more 20+lb fish
TX...none at or above 20 lbs.
trout are the key. warmer climate = longer growing season.
|
|
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program
[Re: Fast Lane]
#8127644
10/18/12 08:03 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,338
T54
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,338 |
CA....10 or more 20+lb fish
TX...none at or above 20 lbs.
trout are the key. warmer climate = longer growing season. Warmer climate? Average year round temps in Texas are higher than CA Diet and water quality would have to be the two biggest factors in the size disparity between CA fish and TX fish.
Last edited by Trey E; 10/18/12 08:04 PM.
|
|
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program
[Re: Troyz]
#8127649
10/18/12 08:05 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,433
fouzman
Methuselah
|
Methuselah
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,433 |
So which is it? Privately funded or partially privately funded? Have we been misled all these years when we have been told it is not funded by the State? Private. Dan Friedken and Gulf States Toyota. For at least three more years. One of the largest supporters of TPWD. Here's what's in store for this year. Read about the change in pick-up procedures. Doing all they can to cut down on stress. http://www.texashuntfish.com/app/view/Post/35891/Toyota-ShareLunker-Season-27-Just-Around-the-Corner
Coincidence is His way of remaining anonymous.
|
|
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program
[Re: Ken A.]
#8127802
10/18/12 09:00 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 739
T-Gauntt
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 739 |
Don't a lot of the big fish lakes in California naturally hold rainbow trout?
I know the stripers below the Cayon lake dam are massive due to the rainbow trout stocking in the guadalupe every winter. I'm definitely not a marine biologist, and I'm just speculating but... Stands to reason that the larger bass in CA may be in part to the high fat content and soft bones of rainbow trout. Which is also why Huddleston swimbaits seems to catch such quality bass... Just an idea.
-Taylor
|
|
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program
[Re: Ken A.]
#8127958
10/18/12 09:48 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,433
fouzman
Methuselah
|
Methuselah
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,433 |
www.bassresource.com/fish_biology/lunker_largemouth.htmlOne of the very best, concise pieces ever written about what it takes to grow big bass. And by a man who knows what he is talking about. We all know that lakes cycle. Relatively stable lakes like Fork not as much as the wildly fluctuating, such as Falcon. It becomes a new lake with new habitat about every 10 or so years. Fork and other stable reservoirs pretty much peak in productivity around their 10th years. From there, habitat and water quality decline. Most of the giant fish caught at Fork and in the Top 50 were first stockings of pure Floridas at their respective lake's peaks. The SAL program is more about genetic engineering than anything. It takes many, many years to develop lineage on the best producers so that they may be used to produce a fish that is genetically superior to the norm. Deer breeders are a prime example. Used to be, breeders grew lots of 150-175" deer with a few 200's. Through line breeding and maintenance of records on their herds, breeders got better and better at identifying both males and females that were top producers. Now days, there are 300" deer all over the state of Texas in breeding pens. I know of a couple over 400 and one over 500. Genetic engineering at it's best. SAL is somewhat geared toward the same thing. Only they have far fewer specimens to work with than deer breeders so, naturally, its going to take longer to get there. And I believe SAL's primary goal is more bass that will grow larger faster to replenish constantly declining genetics in Texas lakes. Not necessarily large numbers of 15+'s as they are simply freaks and it would take new lakes to accomplish. That's why new water bodies like Naconchie have the potential to break the state record years down the road, if they are taken care of.
Coincidence is His way of remaining anonymous.
|
|
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program
[Re: Ken A.]
#8128002
10/18/12 10:04 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,433
fouzman
Methuselah
|
Methuselah
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,433 |
One other thing. Bob's first two are habitat and food chain. Our lakes are too large to control water quality like a private manager can. Just not feasible. So habitat will naturally decline with age. Food chain is a direct result of water quality. So what can we control on a large scale? Genetics and harvest.
I'm like the rest of ya'll on habitat. I wish that TPWD would manage rather than eradicate "invasives" like Hydrilla.
Coincidence is His way of remaining anonymous.
|
|
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program
[Re: Ken A.]
#8128178
10/18/12 10:52 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 15,730
Texas Husker
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 15,730 |
Believe strongly in the program. Just hope that one day I will be able to donate a 13 lber. to the program.
With the genetic footprint now available, this is going to give us some very interesting data on new big fish coming in.
|
|
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program
[Re: fouzman]
#8128198
10/18/12 10:57 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,158
salex
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,158 |
I'm late to the party on this one. I have posed the question of what role does genetics play in growing big bass with many of the brightest minds in private lake fisheries management. And almost without fail, the conclusion is food chain is by FAR the most important factor to growing big bass. In fact, allowing your bass to grow up with their forage bass (new lake) is best. As Chris said, lakes peak at about year 10. Habitat, harvest, and genetics all play a role. Nobody knows for sure, how much genetics plays in the entire process, but common sense and science tells us that you spawn a superior female and a superior male, your more likely to grow superior offspring.
Having said food chain (water quality, forage) plays the most significant role in growing big bass, I do think superior genetics might give a fish an extra small percentage. To me, the debate is really what percentage that is. In other words, given SAL fish or other known or beleived to be known superior genetic fish vs a pure florida bass. If we gave these two fish identical circumstances; what percent larger would the superior genetic fish be as compared to a pure florida fish. The inherent challenge is creating the ideal environment. There are dozens of factors that come into play in addition to food chain. Some of those are harvest, predators (commorants, otters ect...) dissolved oxygen kills or events, other genetics entering the lake from downstream or upstream lakes, water fertility etc..
I am embarrased to tell write how much time I have spent talking and writing about this issue, with friends, biologist, and others in fisheries management world.
BTW, I read the posts on this subject and floored by the knowledge of this subject by some of you. Ken, Chris, and Dr JL; Your knowledge of the subject is outstanding and thanks for sharing this with the group.
|
|
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program
[Re: salex]
#8128324
10/18/12 11:43 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,800
FZ1
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,800 |
I'm late to the party on this one. I have posed the question of what role does genetics play in growing big bass with many of the brightest minds in private lake fisheries management. And almost without fail, the conclusion is food chain is by FAR the most important factor to growing big bass. In fact, allowing your bass to grow up with their forage bass (new lake) is best. As Chris said, lakes peak at about year 10. Habitat, harvest, and genetics all play a role. Nobody knows for sure, how much genetics plays in the entire process, but common sense and science tells us that you spawn a superior female and a superior male, your more likely to grow superior offspring.
Having said food chain (water quality, forage) plays the most significant role in growing big bass, I do think superior genetics might give a fish an extra small percentage. To me, the debate is really what percentage that is. In other words, given SAL fish or other known or beleived to be known superior genetic fish vs a pure florida bass. If we gave these two fish identical circumstances; what percent larger would the superior genetic fish be as compared to a pure florida fish. The inherent challenge is creating the ideal environment. There are dozens of factors that come into play in addition to food chain. Some of those are harvest, predators (commorants, otters ect...) dissolved oxygen kills or events, other genetics entering the lake from downstream or upstream lakes, water fertility etc..
I am embarrased to tell write how much time I have spent talking and writing about this issue, with friends, biologist, and others in fisheries management world.
BTW, I read the posts on this subject and floored by the knowledge of this subject by some of you. Ken, Chris, and Dr JL; Your knowledge of the subject is outstanding and thanks for sharing this with the group.
But,uh,Where's the big fish?
|
|
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program
[Re: Ken A.]
#8128333
10/18/12 11:49 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,196
rxkid2001
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,196 |
I see genetics being a large part of the equation. How many times do you watch a college or pro sports event and 1 or both of the athletes parents were good athletes (played in college or pro)? This is not coincidence in my opinion.
|
|
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program
[Re: Ken A.]
#8128334
10/18/12 11:49 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,433
fouzman
Methuselah
|
Methuselah
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,433 |
C'mon FZ, add something to the conversation or STHU!
All of the answers to your question are printed above. Depending upon your reading comprehension.
It would be nice for you to offer something to the TFF other than bravado, smartazz and negativity.
Coincidence is His way of remaining anonymous.
|
|
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program
[Re: fouzman]
#8128369
10/19/12 12:01 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 975
GrandeBass1
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 975 |
www.bassresource.com/fish_biology/lunker_largemouth.htmlOne of the very best, concise pieces ever written about what it takes to grow big bass. And by a man who knows what he is talking about. We all know that lakes cycle. Relatively stable lakes like Fork not as much as the wildly fluctuating, such as Falcon. It becomes a new lake with new habitat about every 10 or so years. Fork and other stable reservoirs pretty much peak in productivity around their 10th years. From there, habitat and water quality decline. Most of the giant fish caught at Fork and in the Top 50 were first stockings of pure Floridas at their respective lake's peaks. The SAL program is more about genetic engineering than anything. It takes many, many years to develop lineage on the best producers so that they may be used to produce a fish that is genetically superior to the norm. Deer breeders are a prime example. Used to be, breeders grew lots of 150-175" deer with a few 200's. Through line breeding and maintenance of records on their herds, breeders got better and better at identifying both males and females that were top producers. Now days, there are 300" deer all over the state of Texas in breeding pens. I know of a couple over 400 and one over 500. Genetic engineering at it's best. SAL is somewhat geared toward the same thing. Only they have far fewer specimens to work with than deer breeders so, naturally, its going to take longer to get there. And I believe SAL's primary goal is more bass that will grow larger faster to replenish constantly declining genetics in Texas lakes. Not necessarily large numbers of 15+'s as they are simply freaks and it would take new lakes to accomplish. That's why new water bodies like Naconchie have the potential to break the state record years down the road, if they are taken care of. Exactly right on both management fronts..
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|