texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Bob81, juan2025, Mjlucky, Azskeeter, Mjhover
119646 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 125,147
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 105,343
Bob Davis 97,516
John175☮ 86,147
Pilothawk 83,939
Mark Perry 74,891
Derek 🐝 68,516
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,059,207
Posts14,315,815
Members144,646
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 5 of 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 28 29
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program [Re: FZ1] #8127582 10/18/12 07:48 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,120
T
Troyz Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,120
Originally Posted By: FZ1
Originally Posted By: Troyz
Originally Posted By: fouzman
Originally Posted By: Troyz
Why limit the program to only certain months of the year. I know the idea is to have the fish spawn in captivity but why not take a fish that is SAL size caught in May or June (or when ever) and put that fish on a special diet that would help ensure healthier/more offspring?


Two reasons. Increased fish mortality in warmer months. It costs LOTS of money to feed BIG bass. Money TPWD doesn't have.


I understand the fish mortality part could be an issue to consider although I believe the way the fish are handled are the real problem with the mortality and not sure if the warm water aspect would add to it. I don't see cost as an issue. I keep hearing that SAL is funded by Sponsors and does not cost the state or TPWD anything. Is this not the case?
Higher water temperatures = Higher mortality. That is a fact.


Higher water temperatures = need for better handling and fish care. That is a fact. Higher water temperatures does not have to = higher mortality rate.

Last edited by Troyz; 10/18/12 07:51 PM.
Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program [Re: Ken A.] #8127594 10/18/12 07:52 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 739
T
T-Gauntt Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
T
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 739
I'll be happy to donate major $$$ to SAL program, but I need the precise coordinates of this so called "Lake X" first


-Taylor
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program [Re: Troyz] #8127603 10/18/12 07:53 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,338
T
T54 Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
T
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,338
Originally Posted By: Troyz
So which is it? Privately funded or partially privately funded? Have we been misled all these years when we have been told it is not funded by the State?


I have no idea, but if you think about operating expenses for vehicles and facilities, accumulated depreciation of state assets, use of state employee time, etc, there is no way that they tally it all up at the end of the year and mail an invoice to Toyota.

I am assuming like most sponsorship, Toyota cuts them a check every year for a fixed amount of money. Maybe this $ amount covers everything and then some. They could be making money off the deal, but I really doubt it.

Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program [Re: Poetfury] #8127629 10/18/12 07:58 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,053
F
Fast Lane Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
F
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,053
Originally Posted By: Poetfury
CA....10 or more 20+lb fish

TX...none at or above 20 lbs.

trout are the key.
warmer climate = longer growing season.

Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program [Re: Fast Lane] #8127644 10/18/12 08:03 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,338
T
T54 Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
T
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,338
Originally Posted By: Fast Lane
Originally Posted By: Poetfury
CA....10 or more 20+lb fish

TX...none at or above 20 lbs.

trout are the key.
warmer climate = longer growing season.


Warmer climate?

Average year round temps in Texas are higher than CA

Diet and water quality would have to be the two biggest factors in the size disparity between CA fish and TX fish.

Last edited by Trey E; 10/18/12 08:04 PM.
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program [Re: Troyz] #8127649 10/18/12 08:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,433
fouzman Offline
Methuselah
Offline
Methuselah
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,433
Originally Posted By: Troyz
So which is it? Privately funded or partially privately funded? Have we been misled all these years when we have been told it is not funded by the State?


Private. Dan Friedken and Gulf States Toyota. For at least three more years. One of the largest supporters of TPWD. Here's what's in store for this year. Read about the change in pick-up procedures. Doing all they can to cut down on stress.

http://www.texashuntfish.com/app/view/Post/35891/Toyota-ShareLunker-Season-27-Just-Around-the-Corner


Coincidence is His way of remaining anonymous.
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program [Re: Ken A.] #8127802 10/18/12 09:00 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 739
T
T-Gauntt Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
T
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 739
Don't a lot of the big fish lakes in California naturally hold rainbow trout?

I know the stripers below the Cayon lake dam are massive due to the rainbow trout stocking in the guadalupe every winter. I'm definitely not a marine biologist, and I'm just speculating but... Stands to reason that the larger bass in CA may be in part to the high fat content and soft bones of rainbow trout. Which is also why Huddleston swimbaits seems to catch such quality bass... Just an idea.


-Taylor
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program [Re: Ken A.] #8127958 10/18/12 09:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,433
fouzman Offline
Methuselah
Offline
Methuselah
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,433
www.bassresource.com/fish_biology/lunker_largemouth.html

One of the very best, concise pieces ever written about what it takes to grow big bass. And by a man who knows what he is talking about.

We all know that lakes cycle. Relatively stable lakes like Fork not as much as the wildly fluctuating, such as Falcon. It becomes a new lake with new habitat about every 10 or so years. Fork and other stable reservoirs pretty much peak in productivity around their 10th years. From there, habitat and water quality decline.

Most of the giant fish caught at Fork and in the Top 50 were first stockings of pure Floridas at their respective lake's peaks.

The SAL program is more about genetic engineering than anything. It takes many, many years to develop lineage on the best producers so that they may be used to produce a fish that is genetically superior to the norm.

Deer breeders are a prime example. Used to be, breeders grew lots of 150-175" deer with a few 200's. Through line breeding and maintenance of records on their herds, breeders got better and better at identifying both males and females that were top producers. Now days, there are 300" deer all over the state of Texas in breeding pens. I know of a couple over 400 and one over 500. Genetic engineering at it's best.

SAL is somewhat geared toward the same thing. Only they have far fewer specimens to work with than deer breeders so, naturally, its going to take longer to get there. And I believe SAL's primary goal is more bass that will grow larger faster to replenish constantly declining genetics in Texas lakes. Not necessarily large numbers of 15+'s as they are simply freaks and it would take new lakes to accomplish. That's why new water bodies like Naconchie have the potential to break the state record years down the road, if they are taken care of.


Coincidence is His way of remaining anonymous.
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program [Re: Ken A.] #8128002 10/18/12 10:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,433
fouzman Offline
Methuselah
Offline
Methuselah
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,433
One other thing. Bob's first two are habitat and food chain. Our lakes are too large to control water quality like a private manager can. Just not feasible. So habitat will naturally decline with age. Food chain is a direct result of water quality. So what can we control on a large scale? Genetics and harvest.

I'm like the rest of ya'll on habitat. I wish that TPWD would manage rather than eradicate "invasives" like Hydrilla.


Coincidence is His way of remaining anonymous.
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program [Re: Ken A.] #8128178 10/18/12 10:52 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 15,730
T
Texas Husker Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
T
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 15,730
Believe strongly in the program. Just hope that one day I will be able to donate a 13 lber. to the program.

With the genetic footprint now available, this is going to give us some very interesting data on new big fish coming in.

Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program [Re: fouzman] #8128198 10/18/12 10:57 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,158
S
salex Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
S
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,158
I'm late to the party on this one. I have posed the question of what role does genetics play in growing big bass with many of the brightest minds in private lake fisheries management. And almost without fail, the conclusion is food chain is by FAR the most important factor to growing big bass. In fact, allowing your bass to grow up with their forage bass (new lake) is best. As Chris said, lakes peak at about year 10. Habitat, harvest, and genetics all play a role. Nobody knows for sure, how much genetics plays in the entire process, but common sense and science tells us that you spawn a superior female and a superior male, your more likely to grow superior offspring.

Having said food chain (water quality, forage) plays the most significant role in growing big bass, I do think superior genetics might give a fish an extra small percentage. To me, the debate is really what percentage that is. In other words, given SAL fish or other known or beleived to be known superior genetic fish vs a pure florida bass. If we gave these two fish identical circumstances; what percent larger would the superior genetic fish be as compared to a pure florida fish. The inherent challenge is creating the ideal environment. There are dozens of factors that come into play in addition to food chain. Some of those are harvest, predators (commorants, otters ect...) dissolved oxygen kills or events, other genetics entering the lake from downstream or upstream lakes, water fertility etc..

I am embarrased to tell write how much time I have spent talking and writing about this issue, with friends, biologist, and others in fisheries management world.

BTW, I read the posts on this subject and floored by the knowledge of this subject by some of you. Ken, Chris, and Dr JL; Your knowledge of the subject is outstanding and thanks for sharing this with the group.


Steve Alexander
salexander@privatewaterfishing.com
www.privatewaterfishing.com

Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program [Re: salex] #8128324 10/18/12 11:43 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,800
F
FZ1 Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
F
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,800
Originally Posted By: salex
I'm late to the party on this one. I have posed the question of what role does genetics play in growing big bass with many of the brightest minds in private lake fisheries management. And almost without fail, the conclusion is food chain is by FAR the most important factor to growing big bass. In fact, allowing your bass to grow up with their forage bass (new lake) is best. As Chris said, lakes peak at about year 10. Habitat, harvest, and genetics all play a role. Nobody knows for sure, how much genetics plays in the entire process, but common sense and science tells us that you spawn a superior female and a superior male, your more likely to grow superior offspring.

Having said food chain (water quality, forage) plays the most significant role in growing big bass, I do think superior genetics might give a fish an extra small percentage. To me, the debate is really what percentage that is. In other words, given SAL fish or other known or beleived to be known superior genetic fish vs a pure florida bass. If we gave these two fish identical circumstances; what percent larger would the superior genetic fish be as compared to a pure florida fish. The inherent challenge is creating the ideal environment. There are dozens of factors that come into play in addition to food chain. Some of those are harvest, predators (commorants, otters ect...) dissolved oxygen kills or events, other genetics entering the lake from downstream or upstream lakes, water fertility etc..

I am embarrased to tell write how much time I have spent talking and writing about this issue, with friends, biologist, and others in fisheries management world.

BTW, I read the posts on this subject and floored by the knowledge of this subject by some of you. Ken, Chris, and Dr JL; Your knowledge of the subject is outstanding and thanks for sharing this with the group.







But,uh,Where's the big fish?

Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program [Re: Ken A.] #8128333 10/18/12 11:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,196
R
rxkid2001 Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
R
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,196
I see genetics being a large part of the equation. How many times do you watch a college or pro sports event and 1 or both of the athletes parents were good athletes (played in college or pro)? This is not coincidence in my opinion.

Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program [Re: Ken A.] #8128334 10/18/12 11:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,433
fouzman Offline
Methuselah
Offline
Methuselah
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,433
C'mon FZ, add something to the conversation or STHU!

All of the answers to your question are printed above. Depending upon your reading comprehension.

It would be nice for you to offer something to the TFF other than bravado, smartazz and negativity.


Coincidence is His way of remaining anonymous.
Re: Florida Bass in Texas and the SAL Program [Re: fouzman] #8128369 10/19/12 12:01 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 975
G
GrandeBass1 Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
G
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 975
Originally Posted By: fouzman
www.bassresource.com/fish_biology/lunker_largemouth.html

One of the very best, concise pieces ever written about what it takes to grow big bass. And by a man who knows what he is talking about.

We all know that lakes cycle. Relatively stable lakes like Fork not as much as the wildly fluctuating, such as Falcon. It becomes a new lake with new habitat about every 10 or so years. Fork and other stable reservoirs pretty much peak in productivity around their 10th years. From there, habitat and water quality decline.

Most of the giant fish caught at Fork and in the Top 50 were first stockings of pure Floridas at their respective lake's peaks.

The SAL program is more about genetic engineering than anything. It takes many, many years to develop lineage on the best producers so that they may be used to produce a fish that is genetically superior to the norm.

Deer breeders are a prime example. Used to be, breeders grew lots of 150-175" deer with a few 200's. Through line breeding and maintenance of records on their herds, breeders got better and better at identifying both males and females that were top producers. Now days, there are 300" deer all over the state of Texas in breeding pens. I know of a couple over 400 and one over 500. Genetic engineering at it's best.

SAL is somewhat geared toward the same thing. Only they have far fewer specimens to work with than deer breeders so, naturally, its going to take longer to get there. And I believe SAL's primary goal is more bass that will grow larger faster to replenish constantly declining genetics in Texas lakes. Not necessarily large numbers of 15+'s as they are simply freaks and it would take new lakes to accomplish. That's why new water bodies like Naconchie have the potential to break the state record years down the road, if they are taken care of.



Exactly right on both management fronts..


www.grandebass.com


MADE IN TEXAS
Page 5 of 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 28 29
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3