|
Forums59
Topics1,057,448
Posts14,284,648
Members144,609
| |
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
 Re: Sidescan vs. StructureScan
[Re: Sabot]
#4414967
01/28/10 05:33 PM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,889
Martin Ping
Extreme Angler
|
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,889 |
Cool pics, not quite apples to apples on those settings but nice all the same...So what happens if Johnson wins that lawsuit?...Does Lowrance have to quit making and servicing those units?
-Tim  
|
|
|
Re: Sidescan vs. StructureScan
[Re: Martin Ping]
#4415027
01/28/10 05:48 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,548
Sabot
OP
Extreme Angler
|
|
OP
Extreme Angler
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,548 |
Don't know at this time. When I have time, I will do some research to see if there is any information out there in regards to the suit.
PREDATOR MK ANGLER
|
|
|
Re: Sidescan vs. StructureScan
[Re: Sabot]
#4415598
01/28/10 07:54 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 457
hotmod
Angler
|
|
Angler
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 457 |
You can take either unit & make it look better than the other. There are just too many ways to make one look bad. Make the proper adjustments on the HB & it will look as sharp or sharper than the HDS w/structure scan.
A bad day on the lake is much better than a good day at work!
|
|
|
Re: Sidescan vs. StructureScan
[Re: hotmod]
#4416617
01/28/10 11:39 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 216
JUGHEAD
Outdoorsman
|
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 216 |
Outcome will depend on the negotiations between the companies if HB wins. HB could license lowrance to make the side scan, make them pay damages and shut them down, or it could be tied up in court so long that something new will come out and make it all old technology.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|
