texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
sandeez, Bward, Richard Cantrell, Liteweight, RealBigfoot
119610 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 124,678
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 104,458
Bob Davis 96,241
John175☮ 86,137
Pilothawk 83,923
Mark Perry 74,867
Derek 🐝 68,499
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,057,562
Posts14,286,556
Members144,610
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Falcon eye crosser, anybody use it? #15252453 11/20/24 07:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 145
bell0347 Offline OP
Outdoorsman
OP Offline
Outdoorsman
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 145
In comparison to a head turner how stiff/fast is it? I’m looking for something to skip docks and bushes with, typically with a 1/2oz jig. Would also be used for toads and heavier swim jigs and stuff in close quarters. I’ve been using the head turner and it’s great but I’ve been schooled a couple times with big fish under docks. I’ve heard the eyecrosser is a short Amistad? Curious if anyone has used one and can compare it to the head turner as far as power and tip. Thanks

Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: Falcon eye crosser, anybody use it? [Re: bell0347] #15252458 11/20/24 07:11 PM
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 27,370
SteezMacQueen Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 27,370
Sounds brutal and stiff. I use a Lizard Dragger for what you are doing. I like the tip and 7’ length. It’s makes controlling the speed of the cast effortless.


Eat. Sleep. Fish.
Re: Falcon eye crosser, anybody use it? [Re: bell0347] #15252580 11/20/24 08:48 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,772
Outdoordude Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,772
The eye crosser is a bit stiffer and a bit faster tip than the head turner. It actually feels a bit stiffer than the Amistad, but that's mainly because it's shorter; there's just less rod to flex on the eye crosser.

The eye crosser can skip heavier stuff nicely. Though, I also think the lizard dragger is a bit better for skipping overall as it loads the weight of the lure more. The flex helps accelerate the lure and it seems easier to dial in the angles for me at least.

I'm splitting hairs on these comparisons, the eye crosser is very good at skipping 1/2+ oz jigs and it's my favorite rod for medium cover jigs, plastics and frogs where accurate close casts are needed. But specifically for skipping, I think the lizard dragger and even the Amistad (if you're not short like me) are slightly better for that purpose.

I think the name throws some off on the lizard dragger; it's an under-rated highly versatile rod in Falcon's lineup.


Scott Jones
Re: Falcon eye crosser, anybody use it? [Re: bell0347] #15252590 11/20/24 08:55 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,743
3
361V Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
3
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,743
Another vote for the Lizard Dragger. It is a good C-rig & worm rod like the name implies but it’s my “all around” rod too. Spinnerbaits, square bills, bladed jigs, swim jigs….almost everything….including what you’re talking about.

Re: Falcon eye crosser, anybody use it? [Re: bell0347] #15252602 11/20/24 09:04 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,207
Sinkey Offline
Tidy Scoop
Offline
Tidy Scoop
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,207
Eye Crosser is a better frog rod to me. Lizard dragger is a better pitching/casting rod.

Re: Falcon eye crosser, anybody use it? [Re: bell0347] #15252629 11/20/24 09:38 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,891
B
Barn Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
B
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,891
I use it for my swim jigs and skipping. I like it better that Head Turner for this. I use my Head Turners for spinnerbaits, I like the Amistad for Frogging, Jigs and more. Skipping isn't my forte so there might be a better option. But to me it's cross between the two rods.

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3