Forums59
Topics1,057,204
Posts14,281,118
Members144,604
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Livescope vs Livescope plus
#14565193
12/15/22 03:40 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 163
cg203
OP
Outdoorsman
|
OP
Outdoorsman
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 163 |
Livescope is $999 and Livescope plus is $1699 right now. Is Livescope plus worth the $700 difference?
|
|
Re: Livescope vs Livescope plus
[Re: cg203]
#14565327
12/15/22 01:16 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,535
Rube G.
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,535 |
The LVS-34 transducer does give you a little clearer picture, better fish separation & bottom/fish separation, if you fish a lot, then yes it's worth the xtra bucks. I upgraded about 6 months ago.
|
|
Re: Livescope vs Livescope plus
[Re: cg203]
#14566412
12/16/22 04:11 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 8,918
Jpurdue
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 8,918 |
I've watched a lot of videos on it. From what I can see it's marginally better. Maybe 20-30%, maybe. The whole livescope game is much more difficult than it looks. It' 's like golf clubs, if you are a pro the extra 5 yards on the farway from the high dollar clubs is worth it. If you are an amature, 5 yards farther on your shank does you no good. I decided to stick with the LVS32 for now and practice more.
Last edited by Jpurdue; 12/16/22 04:12 PM.
"Bragging may not bring happiness, but no man having caught a large fish goes home through an alley." -A.L. www.LunkerLore.com
|
|
Re: Livescope vs Livescope plus
[Re: cg203]
#14566599
12/16/22 07:09 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,027
SRitchey
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,027 |
I've had the 32 now have the 34. If you crappie fish and it's mounted to the pole the 32 is good. The 34 is better all around, especially if you bass fish. Mines mounted on the Ultrex shaft and I love it!
Steve
1999 ChampioN 203 - 2011 250hp Mercury Optimax Pro XS 2-10" Helix & 1-10" Garmin Livescope Plus - Ultrex 36/112
|
|
Re: Livescope vs Livescope plus
[Re: cg203]
#14567144
12/17/22 01:41 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 604
Larry Mosby
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 604 |
The ghost tree is gone on the 34 and it’s somewhat better. If you haven’t used Livescope at all and wanting to learn then the 32 is the best bang for your buck. As far as target separation from the bottom I can’t tell any difference. When fish get really close to the bottom then they disappear with both the 32 and 34. I use mine bass fishing and crank my gain up considerably to see my lure at 80-90’ out. Using the 34 in this manner there’s not as much distortion on the screen as when I ran the 32. If you’re looking for the best the 34 is for you but the best deals monetarily are always going to be with older versions.
Larry Mosby
|
|
Re: Livescope vs Livescope plus
[Re: cg203]
#14568962
12/19/22 03:27 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 10,450
Jons3825
~Mod Alert~
|
~Mod Alert~
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 10,450 |
buy once/cry once. You will want the latest tech at some point. If it is a deal/sale get the most you can. Do you want to be 1 or 2 steps back when the next newest comes out?
|
|
Re: Livescope vs Livescope plus
[Re: cg203]
#14569234
12/19/22 07:39 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,502
T-racer @ Mallard Marine
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,502 |
I have a couple lvs34 systems in stock, pm me for price... 
Mallard Marine Nacogdoches, Tx 936-225-3244 - Authorized Sales/Service Mercury Outboards - Allison Boats
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|