Is that your answer to my question(s)?

We'll still be here cleaning up your mess when the worms are crawling through that dense skull of yours here in a couple of years. I take solace in that.

+infinity

The UN may be an ineffective political body, but that doesn't mean a study funded by it is inherently wrong.

Mention of the US not having enough people above. Can someone tell me what area is decreasing in population?

any time you wish to discuss "climate change" you just bring your best A game bub, ready any time you are. oh, bring provable facts to the discussion, not some moronic bs about co2 or methane gases going to kill us in 12 yrs.

Okie dokey?


footnote: I will be bringing peer reviewed studies showing how mother nature herownself is one of our major causes of any climate change, volcanoes, earthquakes, solar occurances as well as LIONS, TIGERS AND BEARS! OH MY!@

Population crash will probably be the biggest challenge humanity faces in the next 100 years. We've built economic and political systems on the back of never-ending growth. When the music stops a bunch of countries are going to be left without a chair. The US will be fine. The millennials are numerous and fairly young still, not to mention, as John pointed out, our borders are being flooded. Illegal immigration creates huge problems to be certain, but so would a declining population. The first country that will implode will be china, there one child policy has caused irreparable damage to their population.

Thanks for your thoughtful answer.

Interesting...every person on the planet (using 8 billion population) could own 181.4 square feet of Arkansas? Never woulda thunk it. LOL

population crash or war from overcrowding, either or would be the first stop to ending the source of everyone's angst.

the ONLY WAY so called climate change can be stopped or even decline (according to all the reasons claimed to be harming it) the earth will have to cleanse itself of

some humans.

you can not sit back and claim mankind is destroying the earth while at the same time out of the other side of your mouth you want more population, sorry, the math

won't add up.

donothins article:


Interesting article of a study funded by the United Nations shows that a model indicates that world population will exceed 8 billion sometime withing the next few days. It also shows that population will probably top out somewhere around 10 billion, and then begin to slowly decline. A few countries such as India will continue to increase, but the average will decrease mostly due to lower birth rates.The implications are pretty significant for sure. Mostly it will mean an aging population with fewer to pay the bills and fewer to do the work. Will not significantly affect those of us on here but could possible affect our kids and grandkids.

Believing in man-made climate change and believing in the problems created by population decline are not mutually exclusive. Nore do I think either of them will be the end of humanity.

There was nothing I said that suggested they were. Hopadoobie was the one that brought that into the discussion. It was a hypothetical question that I found interesting to think about..

Thanks for playing the liberal hypocrite game!!
And I see we have two of the team captains on the field, both have shown outstanding skills at taking two complete different opinions, and believing both of them with equal enthusiasm.

let me lay out a couple of my problems with all this bs manmade climate change.

1. I have yet to see anyone show me any solid proof, NON GOVT. FUNDED research that is peer reviewed that proves we are destroying a dam thing.

2. I can present you facts on volcanoes, wanna talk about the possibility of another massive eruption like krakatoa in the 1800s. how about the massive populations in both china (who is building a new COAL fired power plant A DAY) and then india who is now the second most populous, (1,202 people per mi2). how bout we go to earthquakes, I have facts proving that our axis has shifted due to some recent quakes that literally rocked the world like fukishima.

your comments in red are pointing to wanting more population to offset the anticipated loss over the next few yrs./decades so there are enough "to pay the bills and do the work".
as for the U.N. well, blue helmets make good targets. I wouldn't trust an entity that puts iran, saudi arabia as well as others on the human rights commission that oversees the world, talk about pot callin the kettle black.

so keep up the cheap shots, I will sit back in eager anticipation of your proven/NON GOVT. FUNDED/peer reviewed facts.

To believe the great climate hoax, you must believe things that are impossible to prove, and have been dis proven over and over.

You must believe:
CO2 is a pollutant. It's not, it's essential for life on the planet.
The current CO2 level is 400 parts per million. That's 0.00004% When life thrived on earth at it's highest, CO2 was 1000ppm.
Human produced CO2 is 1 molecule for 86,000 molecules of air. What they can't say is if we went full green retard, and cut that in half, what would happen? Crickets.
The other question, what's the correct temperature? Again, crickets.

When you step back and look at the level of ridiculousness and the only "cure" is taxes and government control, it becomes obvious this has nothing to do with the weather.