Forums59
Topics1,052,381
Posts14,195,189
Members144,490
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Ford Maverick
#14435983
08/01/22 03:02 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 19
Breath-Taker Whitetails
OP
Green Horn
|
OP
Green Horn
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 19 |
Anyone pulling a bass boat with a Ford Maverick? Interested in the towing capabilities. Specifically the fwd hybrid
|
|
Re: Ford Maverick
[Re: Breath-Taker Whitetails]
#14436082
08/01/22 10:33 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 14,115
tmd11111
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 14,115 |
Max towing capacity is 4000# and the hybrid is only 2000#. Gonna have to be a small bass boat.
|
|
Re: Ford Maverick
[Re: Breath-Taker Whitetails]
#14436728
08/01/22 09:30 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 546
TomRom
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 546 |
I just read an article about the Maverick and the towing capacity was weigh below the Ranger. You could probably get by towing a small Bass Tracker type boat.
|
|
Re: Ford Maverick
[Re: TomRom]
#14436848
08/01/22 11:40 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 26,255
SteezMacQueen
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 26,255 |
I just read an article about the Maverick and the towing capacity was weigh below the Ranger. You could probably get by towing a small Bass Tracker type boat. Probably better to use a 1970maverick.
Eat. Sleep. Fish.
|
|
Re: Ford Maverick
[Re: SteezMacQueen]
#14436980
08/02/22 01:41 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 14,115
tmd11111
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 14,115 |
I just read an article about the Maverick and the towing capacity was weigh below the Ranger. You could probably get by towing a small Bass Tracker type boat. Probably better to use a 1970maverick. Worth more than a new one, better looking too.
|
|
Re: Ford Maverick
[Re: Breath-Taker Whitetails]
#14522418
11/01/22 10:42 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,101
Gungle
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,101 |
I got a Ranger Tremor last year. Towing is 7000#. 2.3 4banger turbo. Gets about 20-22 until I hook up the 16' crappie boat. That little 4 banger and 10 so tranny fall flat and mpg drops to 13-15. I'd hate to see mpg towing my 21' bass rig. There's no substitute for cubic inches.
|
|
Re: Ford Maverick
[Re: Breath-Taker Whitetails]
#14524120
11/03/22 03:15 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,013
ChanceHuiet
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,013 |
Most godawful excuse for a truck since the Honda Ridgeline. In what world is a "truck" that small needed. Build another dang El Camino. At least those were cool
I can backlash toilet paper.
|
|
Re: Ford Maverick
[Re: Gungle]
#14524444
11/03/22 10:36 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 26,255
SteezMacQueen
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 26,255 |
I got a Ranger Tremor last year. Towing is 7000#. 2.3 4banger turbo. Gets about 20-22 until I hook up the 16' crappie boat. That little 4 banger and 10 so tranny fall flat and mpg drops to 13-15. I'd hate to see mpg towing my 21' bass rig. There's no substitute for cubic inches. Those are a nice looking package. At least it gets decent mileage. My Tundra drinks gas. 9.9 average. That’s a 10 mile round trip to work, no trailer, and average around 250-300 miles per weekend towing a 20ft heavy bass boat. As long as people remember that the vehicle will NEVER get the window sticker estimated MPG, it’s not a big deal. The new Rangers are almost the same size as my 93 Lightning I had. Same for the GM small trucks. They aren’t much smaller that an 80’s-90’s full size truck. Current full sized trucks are really pretty damn big.
Eat. Sleep. Fish.
|
|
Re: Ford Maverick
[Re: SteezMacQueen]
#14524465
11/03/22 10:50 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 14,115
tmd11111
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 14,115 |
I got a Ranger Tremor last year. Towing is 7000#. 2.3 4banger turbo. Gets about 20-22 until I hook up the 16' crappie boat. That little 4 banger and 10 so tranny fall flat and mpg drops to 13-15. I'd hate to see mpg towing my 21' bass rig. There's no substitute for cubic inches. Those are a nice looking package. At least it gets decent mileage. My Tundra drinks gas. 9.9 average. That’s a 10 mile round trip to work, no trailer, and average around 250-300 miles per weekend towing a 20ft heavy bass boat. As long as people remember that the vehicle will NEVER get the window sticker estimated MPG, it’s not a big deal. The new Rangers are almost the same size as my 93 Lightning I had. Same for the GM small trucks. They aren’t much smaller that an 80’s-90’s full size truck. Current full sized trucks are really pretty damn big. The reason midsized trucks such as the Ranger, Tacoma, Colorado ect. are as big as they are is to beat the CAFE guidelines. Part of vehicle mileage standards is their footprint. The vehicles wheelbase in length and width. It’s also part of the reason the Maverick is as small as it is.
|
|
Re: Ford Maverick
[Re: tmd11111]
#14524622
11/04/22 02:39 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 26,255
SteezMacQueen
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 26,255 |
I got a Ranger Tremor last year. Towing is 7000#. 2.3 4banger turbo. Gets about 20-22 until I hook up the 16' crappie boat. That little 4 banger and 10 so tranny fall flat and mpg drops to 13-15. I'd hate to see mpg towing my 21' bass rig. There's no substitute for cubic inches. Those are a nice looking package. At least it gets decent mileage. My Tundra drinks gas. 9.9 average. That’s a 10 mile round trip to work, no trailer, and average around 250-300 miles per weekend towing a 20ft heavy bass boat. As long as people remember that the vehicle will NEVER get the window sticker estimated MPG, it’s not a big deal. The new Rangers are almost the same size as my 93 Lightning I had. Same for the GM small trucks. They aren’t much smaller that an 80’s-90’s full size truck. Current full sized trucks are really pretty damn big. The reason midsized trucks such as the Ranger, Tacoma, Colorado ect. are as big as they are is to beat the CAFE guidelines. Part of vehicle mileage standards is their footprint. The vehicles wheelbase in length and width. It’s also part of the reason the Maverick is as small as it is. I didn’t know that. Thanks for the education.
Eat. Sleep. Fish.
|
|
Re: Ford Maverick
[Re: Gungle]
#14527699
11/07/22 03:18 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,800
Samsonsworld
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,800 |
There's no substitute for cubic inches. Come tow with my 4.0l 4runner. You'll change your mind on that one. 20mpg is a pipe dream with Toyota.
|
|
Re: Ford Maverick
[Re: Samsonsworld]
#14528560
11/08/22 05:36 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 40,468
Allison1
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 40,468 |
There's no substitute for cubic inches. Come tow with my 4.0l 4runner. You'll change your mind on that one. 20mpg is a pipe dream with Toyota. I had an 86 Toyota one ton. Same size as the regular long bed truck but it was sprung for big weights. The 5 speed transmission was geared slightly lower in top gear but it was still rated 27 mpg highway and got about that unloaded. With the 22RE 4 banger it pulled decent for what it was. I pulled 17-19 foot Rangers with it and got around 17 mpg pulling. After 240k miles and 14 years I traded it in on a Dodge diesel.
|
|
Re: Ford Maverick
[Re: Breath-Taker Whitetails]
#14528608
11/08/22 12:33 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,800
Samsonsworld
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,800 |
I don't know Allison, I think I'd want a little more power but I'm sure it did sip the fuel.
Toyota 22RE = 105hp/137tq @2800rpms Ford 2.3l turbo = 270hp/310tq @3000rpms Toyota 4.0l = 270hp/278tq @4400rpms
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|