texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
jesseh413, Brad2587, C Man, Cameron Gose, Jetskirentals512
119184 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
hopalong 121,073
TexDawg 119,812
Bigbob_FTW 95,370
John175☮ 85,919
Pilothawk 83,275
Bob Davis 82,439
Mark Perry 72,497
Derek 🐝 68,322
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,038,966
Posts13,956,580
Members144,184
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Ford Maverick #14435983 08/01/22 03:02 AM
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 18
B
Breath-Taker Whitetails Offline OP
Green Horn
OP Offline
Green Horn
B
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 18
Anyone pulling a bass boat with a Ford Maverick? Interested in the towing capabilities. Specifically the fwd hybrid

Re: Ford Maverick [Re: Breath-Taker Whitetails] #14436082 08/01/22 10:33 AM
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12,149
tmd11111 Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12,149
Max towing capacity is 4000# and the hybrid is only 2000#. Gonna have to be a small bass boat.

Re: Ford Maverick [Re: Breath-Taker Whitetails] #14436728 08/01/22 09:30 PM
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 544
T
TomRom Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
T
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 544
I just read an article about the Maverick and the towing capacity was weigh below the Ranger. You could probably get by towing a small Bass Tracker type boat.

Re: Ford Maverick [Re: TomRom] #14436848 08/01/22 11:40 PM
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,381
S
SteezMacQueen Online Happy
TFF Guru
Online Happy
TFF Guru
S
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,381
Originally Posted by TomRom
I just read an article about the Maverick and the towing capacity was weigh below the Ranger. You could probably get by towing a small Bass Tracker type boat.

Probably better to use a 1970maverick.
[Linked Image]


Eat. Sleep. Fish.
Re: Ford Maverick [Re: SteezMacQueen] #14436980 08/02/22 01:41 AM
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12,149
tmd11111 Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12,149
Originally Posted by SteezMacQueen
Originally Posted by TomRom
I just read an article about the Maverick and the towing capacity was weigh below the Ranger. You could probably get by towing a small Bass Tracker type boat.

Probably better to use a 1970maverick.
[Linked Image]


Worth more than a new one, better looking too.

Re: Ford Maverick [Re: Breath-Taker Whitetails] #14437163 08/02/22 01:01 PM
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 434
T
TXanalogkd Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
T
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 434
So funny, my dad towed his boat with a 77 Maverick.

Re: Ford Maverick [Re: Breath-Taker Whitetails] #14522418 11/01/22 10:42 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,971
Gungle Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,971
I got a Ranger Tremor last year. Towing is 7000#. 2.3 4banger turbo. Gets about 20-22 until I hook up the 16' crappie boat. That little 4 banger and 10 so tranny fall flat and mpg drops to 13-15. I'd hate to see mpg towing my 21' bass rig. There's no substitute for cubic inches.

Re: Ford Maverick [Re: Breath-Taker Whitetails] #14524120 11/03/22 03:15 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,893
C
ChanceHuiet Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
C
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,893
Most godawful excuse for a truck since the Honda Ridgeline. In what world is a "truck" that small needed. Build another dang El Camino. At least those were cool


Originally Posted by lakeforkfisherman
I can backlash toilet paper.
Re: Ford Maverick [Re: Gungle] #14524444 11/03/22 10:36 PM
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,381
S
SteezMacQueen Online Happy
TFF Guru
Online Happy
TFF Guru
S
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,381
Originally Posted by Gungle
I got a Ranger Tremor last year. Towing is 7000#. 2.3 4banger turbo. Gets about 20-22 until I hook up the 16' crappie boat. That little 4 banger and 10 so tranny fall flat and mpg drops to 13-15. I'd hate to see mpg towing my 21' bass rig. There's no substitute for cubic inches.

Those are a nice looking package. At least it gets decent mileage. My Tundra drinks gas. 9.9 average. That’s a 10 mile round trip to work, no trailer, and average around 250-300 miles per weekend towing a 20ft heavy bass boat.

As long as people remember that the vehicle will NEVER get the window sticker estimated MPG, it’s not a big deal.

The new Rangers are almost the same size as my 93 Lightning I had. Same for the GM small trucks. They aren’t much smaller that an 80’s-90’s full size truck. Current full sized trucks are really pretty damn big.


Eat. Sleep. Fish.
Re: Ford Maverick [Re: SteezMacQueen] #14524465 11/03/22 10:50 PM
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12,149
tmd11111 Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 12,149
Originally Posted by SteezMacQueen
Originally Posted by Gungle
I got a Ranger Tremor last year. Towing is 7000#. 2.3 4banger turbo. Gets about 20-22 until I hook up the 16' crappie boat. That little 4 banger and 10 so tranny fall flat and mpg drops to 13-15. I'd hate to see mpg towing my 21' bass rig. There's no substitute for cubic inches.

Those are a nice looking package. At least it gets decent mileage. My Tundra drinks gas. 9.9 average. That’s a 10 mile round trip to work, no trailer, and average around 250-300 miles per weekend towing a 20ft heavy bass boat.

As long as people remember that the vehicle will NEVER get the window sticker estimated MPG, it’s not a big deal.

The new Rangers are almost the same size as my 93 Lightning I had. Same for the GM small trucks. They aren’t much smaller that an 80’s-90’s full size truck. Current full sized trucks are really pretty damn big.


The reason midsized trucks such as the Ranger, Tacoma, Colorado ect. are as big as they are is to beat the CAFE guidelines. Part of vehicle mileage standards is their footprint. The vehicles wheelbase in length and width. It’s also part of the reason the Maverick is as small as it is.

Re: Ford Maverick [Re: tmd11111] #14524622 11/04/22 02:39 AM
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,381
S
SteezMacQueen Online Happy
TFF Guru
Online Happy
TFF Guru
S
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,381
Originally Posted by tmd11111
Originally Posted by SteezMacQueen
Originally Posted by Gungle
I got a Ranger Tremor last year. Towing is 7000#. 2.3 4banger turbo. Gets about 20-22 until I hook up the 16' crappie boat. That little 4 banger and 10 so tranny fall flat and mpg drops to 13-15. I'd hate to see mpg towing my 21' bass rig. There's no substitute for cubic inches.

Those are a nice looking package. At least it gets decent mileage. My Tundra drinks gas. 9.9 average. That’s a 10 mile round trip to work, no trailer, and average around 250-300 miles per weekend towing a 20ft heavy bass boat.

As long as people remember that the vehicle will NEVER get the window sticker estimated MPG, it’s not a big deal.

The new Rangers are almost the same size as my 93 Lightning I had. Same for the GM small trucks. They aren’t much smaller that an 80’s-90’s full size truck. Current full sized trucks are really pretty damn big.


The reason midsized trucks such as the Ranger, Tacoma, Colorado ect. are as big as they are is to beat the CAFE guidelines. Part of vehicle mileage standards is their footprint. The vehicles wheelbase in length and width. It’s also part of the reason the Maverick is as small as it is.

I didn’t know that. Thanks for the education. cheers


Eat. Sleep. Fish.
Re: Ford Maverick [Re: Breath-Taker Whitetails] #14527166 11/06/22 10:05 PM
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,381
S
SteezMacQueen Online Happy
TFF Guru
Online Happy
TFF Guru
S
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,381
Saw one today in person. Pretty damn ugly.


Eat. Sleep. Fish.
Re: Ford Maverick [Re: Gungle] #14527699 11/07/22 03:18 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,548
S
Samsonsworld Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
S
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,548
Originally Posted by Gungle
There's no substitute for cubic inches.



Come tow with my 4.0l 4runner. You'll change your mind on that one. 20mpg is a pipe dream with Toyota.

Re: Ford Maverick [Re: Samsonsworld] #14528560 11/08/22 05:36 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 36,291
Allison1 Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 36,291
Originally Posted by Samsonsworld
Originally Posted by Gungle
There's no substitute for cubic inches.



Come tow with my 4.0l 4runner. You'll change your mind on that one. 20mpg is a pipe dream with Toyota.


I had an 86 Toyota one ton. Same size as the regular long bed truck but it was sprung for big weights.
The 5 speed transmission was geared slightly lower in top gear but it was still rated 27 mpg highway and got about that unloaded. With the 22RE 4 banger it pulled decent for what it was. I pulled 17-19 foot Rangers with it and got around 17 mpg pulling.

After 240k miles and 14 years I traded it in on a Dodge diesel.


Re: Ford Maverick [Re: Breath-Taker Whitetails] #14528608 11/08/22 12:33 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,548
S
Samsonsworld Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
S
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,548
I don't know Allison, I think I'd want a little more power but I'm sure it did sip the fuel.

Toyota 22RE = 105hp/137tq @2800rpms
Ford 2.3l turbo = 270hp/310tq @3000rpms
Toyota 4.0l = 270hp/278tq @4400rpms

Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3