Forums59
Topics1,057,511
Posts14,285,804
Members144,609
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Re: Why Rayburn is better than Toledo Bend
[Re: MBF]
#13781828
11/23/20 02:21 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,272
BMCD
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,272 |
Im sure harvesting is a factor, but not the main one in my opinion. Its a combination of events that causes a lake to cycle.
I have heard these arguments on several lakes, harvesting and pressure. But fishing returns sometimes within week in some cases.
|
|
Re: Why Rayburn is better than Toledo Bend
[Re: MBF]
#13782047
11/23/20 04:43 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 430
Crick
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 430 |
Remember Bassmaster said it was the #1 lake. I rest my case.
|
|
Re: Why Rayburn is better than Toledo Bend
[Re: MBF]
#13782084
11/23/20 04:58 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,231
Razorback
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,231 |
I have never experienced the great fishing I have heard about on Toledo Bend on any of my trips there. Maybe it's a matter of only being really good if a person knows some specific deep areas that hold fish. To me that's not the definition of excellent fishing for the overwhelming majority of anglers.
|
|
Re: Why Rayburn is better than Toledo Bend
[Re: MBF]
#13782191
11/23/20 06:06 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 387
Gruber
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 387 |
There is no lake where you can go up and down the bank and be successful year round, only 5 percent of the bass ever enter the shallows! But your right about the deep water structure, and that’s where 95 percent of the bass live!
|
|
Re: Why Rayburn is better than Toledo Bend
[Re: MBF]
#13782289
11/23/20 07:33 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,701
Cmack
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,701 |
Last edited by Cmack; 11/23/20 07:34 PM.
|
|
Re: Why Rayburn is better than Toledo Bend
[Re: Gruber]
#13782383
11/23/20 08:55 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 11,820
txmasterpo
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 11,820 |
There is no lake where you can go up and down the bank and be successful year round, only 5 percent of the bass ever enter the shallows! But your right about the deep water structure, and that’s where 95 percent of the bass live! That's a completely false statement in most East Texas lakes "No lake" ??? Yeah bull [censored]
|
|
Re: Why Rayburn is better than Toledo Bend
[Re: MBF]
#13782948
11/24/20 04:55 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 57,818
RayBob
Super Freak
|
Super Freak
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 57,818 |
According to TP&W the catch and release rate on Rayburn is over 70% and on TB it's around or less than 30%. Which do you think provides more opportunities to catch.
TB has a pretty significant giant salvinia problem and both states are spraying it. The net effect is other water plants killed. So yes, hydrilla and coontail is gone from these areas.
Rayburn is being sprayed less.
Any lake with large amounts of aquatic vegetation will have denser bas population.
Advice? Wise men don't need it. Fools won't heed it !
|
|
Re: Why Rayburn is better than Toledo Bend
[Re: Gruber]
#13783104
11/24/20 01:22 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,062
ChanceHuiet
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,062 |
There is no lake where you can go up and down the bank and be successful year round, only 5 percent of the bass ever enter the shallows! But your right about the deep water structure, and that’s where 95 percent of the bass live! BAHAHAHAHA yeah ok man. I'll tell you what I'll put up $500 right now if you come to lake houston and catch a limit out offshore. And i don't mean 10 foot off the bank. I mean truly offshore. You have no idea what your talking about saying "no lake"
I can backlash toilet paper.
|
|
Re: Why Rayburn is better than Toledo Bend
[Re: MBF]
#13783130
11/24/20 01:44 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 26,650
senko9S
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 26,650 |
gruber, toof and nail....
|
|
Re: Why Rayburn is better than Toledo Bend
[Re: MBF]
#13783132
11/24/20 01:44 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 732
TxBazzn
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 732 |
These threads are so dumb. We’ve had a place on the lake for 40 years. It’s been one of the most popular lakes in the country the entire time. The Cajuns have been there since it opened and yet somehow it still becomes the #1 lake in the country time and time again.
You think simple if you think the explanation for T-Bends struggles is the Cajuns.
|
|
Re: Why Rayburn is better than Toledo Bend
[Re: MBF]
#13783176
11/24/20 02:08 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,393
ogles824 (aka Lakewaydr50)
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,393 |
Yes back in the 60's, 70's, and 80's probably 90% or better of the fish that were caught in Tbend went into the grease and yet it produced limits for almost everybody that showed up year in and year out; especially during the spring time. Yes this horse is getting beat to mush now.........
2012 ZX200 Skeeter 2012 Yamaha 200 SHO Isaiah 40:31 "but those who hope in the Lord will renew their strength. They will soar on wings like eagles, they will run and not grow weary, they will walk and not be faint. Proud student of the Pro Staffer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzwF72B2F2w&t=14s
|
|
Re: Why Rayburn is better than Toledo Bend
[Re: TxBazzn]
#13783197
11/24/20 02:22 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 11,008
BigDozer66
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 11,008 |
These threads are so dumb. We’ve had a place on the lake for 40 years. It’s been one of the most popular lakes in the country the entire time. The Cajuns have been there since it opened and yet somehow it still becomes the #1 lake in the country time and time again.
You think simple if you think the explanation for T-Bends struggles is the Cajuns. 
2016 Ranger RT188 Charcoal Metallic Dual Console 2017 Yamaha 115 VMAX SHO (VF115LA) SS Prop Minn Kota Ultrex i-Pilot Link 45" 80 lb. Humminbird Helix 10 Mega SI BalZout Console Humminbird Helix 10 Mega SI BBT Bow Mount Trick Step
|
|
Re: Why Rayburn is better than Toledo Bend
[Re: MBF]
#13783219
11/24/20 02:38 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 465
Polly Gosh Lizard
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 465 |
I have typed my thoughts on this 3 times and erased them all because it does no good to complain on here about people eating bass, as long as it's legal, they can and will do it. Try send some emails to SRA about lowering the limits and maybe that will do some good. I've fish TB since it opened and have seen the catching be really good and then not so good, that's the way it works.
Never test the depth of the water with both feet.
Bobby
|
|
Re: Why Rayburn is better than Toledo Bend
[Re: MBF]
#13783330
11/24/20 03:39 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 654
Cuervo Jones
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 654 |
In Wyoming, we used to blame the Colorado guys for poor fishing. We called them “Greenies” back when their license plates had the green mountains on the white background. Bad day? Blame the Greenies! It’s human nature to blame “those other guys over that way.”
“Slide”
|
|
Re: Why Rayburn is better than Toledo Bend
[Re: RayBob]
#13783679
11/24/20 07:22 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,142
bus driver
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,142 |
According to TP&W the catch and release rate on Rayburn is over 70% and on TB it's around or less than 30%. Which do you think provides more opportunities to catch.
TB has a pretty significant giant salvinia problem and both states are spraying it. The net effect is other water plants killed. So yes, hydrilla and coontail is gone from these areas.
Rayburn is being sprayed less.
Any lake with large amounts of aquatic vegetation will have denser bas population.
Bingo!!
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|