Forums59
Topics1,055,673
Posts14,256,524
Members144,568
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Re: Pro XS vs SHO (newer model years for both)
[Re: Dr. Chase]
#12285841
06/09/17 12:40 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,860
Bruce's
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,860 |
New model pro xs owners: how much oil are you going through? Like fishing every weekend?
I have used 3 gallons of oil in 71 hours on my new Pro XS 250. I dont think that is a lot of oil On my previous motor i seemed to be putting oil in every other month.
Fishing Texas lakes one at a time
|
|
Re: Pro XS vs SHO (newer model years for both)
[Re: Dr. Chase]
#12285877
06/09/17 12:57 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 17,682
grout-scout
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 17,682 |
PS-don't high jack my thread bro... Lol ok, thought maybe you'd like to hear more opinions about the options. Guys that have the g2 love it, I was just hoping maybe there'd be someone here that's run one against the others. I'll make sure to never "hi-jack" your thread there, Bro. I think you'd be a fine canidate to buy the Pro XS with the compressor problems and the fact that they are soon to be discontinued for a 4 stroke lineup from mercury. Smart choice for someone like you.
|
|
Re: Pro XS vs SHO (newer model years for both)
[Re: Dr. Chase]
#12285987
06/09/17 01:55 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 28,672
T Bird
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 28,672 |
Both great products. Yamaha higher purchase and parts price.
Okie by birth, Texan by choice. ![[Linked Image]](https://texasfishingforum.com/forums/pics/userpics/2021/01/full-47849-80883-111.jpg) USAF "Thunderbirds" Alumni 1985-1989
|
|
Re: Pro XS vs SHO (newer model years for both)
[Re: Dr. Chase]
#12285995
06/09/17 02:02 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 558
LinkLowrance
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 558 |
Have run both...Mercury on the boat this year. I switched over to the Quicksilver Premium Plus oil instead of the Mercury DFI specific oil in mine, and I haven't had one problem.
Got the compressor recall taken care of, and all is good.
SHO will jump out on the Pro XS coming out of the hole, but once on pad the Merc starts reeling it in. I see around 77mph GPS with the Pro XS in my 920, loaded. That's with a worked 26 by Mark Croxton. Saw about 73-74 with the SHO on the stock prop.
There's just something about a 2 stroke, for me anyways. To each their own
|
|
Re: Pro XS vs SHO (newer model years for both)
[Re: grout-scout]
#12286009
06/09/17 02:10 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,773
Dr. Chase
OP
TFF Team Angler
|
OP
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,773 |
PS-don't high jack my thread bro... Lol ok, thought maybe you'd like to hear more opinions about the options. Guys that have the g2 love it, I was just hoping maybe there'd be someone here that's run one against the others. I'll make sure to never "hi-jack" your thread there, Bro. I think you'd be a fine canidate to buy the Pro XS with the compressor problems and the fact that they are soon to be discontinued for a 4 stroke lineup from mercury. Smart choice for someone like you. I don't think I like your little attitude. How about you go sit on a g2 propshaft. Seems like a smart choice for someone like you. D bag.
|
|
Re: Pro XS vs SHO (newer model years for both)
[Re: Dr. Chase]
#12286010
06/09/17 02:10 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,773
Dr. Chase
OP
TFF Team Angler
|
OP
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,773 |
To everyone else, thank you for your comments and info.
|
|
Re: Pro XS vs SHO (newer model years for both)
[Re: Dr. Chase]
#12286264
06/09/17 04:25 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 17,682
grout-scout
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 17,682 |
PS-don't high jack my thread bro... Lol ok, thought maybe you'd like to hear more opinions about the options. Guys that have the g2 love it, I was just hoping maybe there'd be someone here that's run one against the others. I'll make sure to never "hi-jack" your thread there, Bro. I think you'd be a fine canidate to buy the Pro XS with the compressor problems and the fact that they are soon to be discontinued for a 4 stroke lineup from mercury. Smart choice for someone like you. I don't think I like your little attitude. How about you go sit on a g2 propshaft. Seems like a smart choice for someone like you. D bag. But Bro, shall we talk about the sho making oil or broken compressors and the replacement of injecters & fuel system cleaning afterwards? But seriously, do remember that if you change brands you will also have to change out all components associated with the motor. Such as the shifter, wiring harness, etc.
|
|
Re: Pro XS vs SHO (newer model years for both)
[Re: Dr. Chase]
#12286314
06/09/17 04:57 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,773
Dr. Chase
OP
TFF Team Angler
|
OP
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,773 |
Not repowering. Buying new.
|
|
Re: Pro XS vs SHO (newer model years for both)
[Re: Dr. Chase]
#12288372
06/11/17 02:28 PM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 611
Diezel_Rocker
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 611 |
I had a 200 Pro XS on my Bass Cat Pantera Classic (2012) and it was an awesome motor. I never had a single problem, it basically used no gas and was super quick out of the hole and top end. I loved the motor. I think i filled up the oil canister once or twice a year so it wasn't a big deal. Quick Silver oil at Academy. Like others have said.. on a new boat the Pro XS will be cheapest, SHO about 2K more and a G2 about 3K more than the XS.
I actually went with the G2 on my new Bass Cat. It is a beast of a motor with the best fuel economy and most power. New boat will be here in 6 weeks or so for a full review.
I never considered the SHO just because it was the motor I wasn't familiar with.. best of luck,
|
|
Re: Pro XS vs SHO (newer model years for both)
[Re: Dr. Chase]
#12288464
06/11/17 03:46 PM
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 8,915
Barrett
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 8,915 |
I like them both. I personally run a SHO and love the hole shot and the fact I never have to put oil into it like my last boat. I think the engine is much more responsive then the Mercury however I think the mercury is prob a little bit more reliable engine with a better top end. I think you will like whatever you get. Both great motors.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|