Forums59
Topics1,056,829
Posts14,275,276
Members144,597
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
new f150 Crew Cab 5.0 or Ecoboost
#9961459
05/06/14 12:06 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,934
Just James
OP
Extreme Angler
|
OP
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,934 |
My son wants to buy a new Ford but he is tossed between a 5.0 or Ecoboost motor ? Opinions?
|
|
Re: new f150 Crew Cab 5.0 or Ecoboost
[Re: Just James]
#9961657
05/06/14 01:02 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 17,783
grout-scout
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 17,783 |
The gas mileage in the Ecos haven't been quite as advertised. My uncle bought one a few months ago and said he wishes he'd just gotten the 5.0 but to be fair he complains about all vechicles.
|
|
Re: new f150 Crew Cab 5.0 or Ecoboost
[Re: Just James]
#9961686
05/06/14 01:11 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,182
throwback
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,182 |
It's the torque for towing that sells the e-boost.
At least my boat and truck are paid for, woo hoo!
|
|
Re: new f150 Crew Cab 5.0 or Ecoboost
[Re: Just James]
#9962576
05/06/14 01:09 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 9,086
Samsonsworld
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 9,086 |
The eco competes with the 6.2l powerwise and the 5.0l economy wise. What's not to like about that?
|
|
Re: new f150 Crew Cab 5.0 or Ecoboost
[Re: Samsonsworld]
#9962623
05/06/14 01:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,491
redchevy
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,491 |
The eco competes with the 6.2l powerwise and the 5.0l economy wise. What's not to like about that? x2 I know several people who recently purchased ecoboosts and they are all happy.
|
|
Re: new f150 Crew Cab 5.0 or Ecoboost
[Re: redchevy]
#9964624
05/07/14 02:49 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 194
OneFishTwoFish
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 194 |
The eco competes with the 6.2l powerwise and the 5.0l economy wise. What's not to like about that? x2 I know several people who recently purchased ecoboosts and they are all happy. X3 - just bought a 4x4 supercrew xlt in March, overall average is around 16, power is what makes it a great truck.
|
|
Re: new f150 Crew Cab 5.0 or Ecoboost
[Re: Samsonsworld]
#9964833
05/07/14 05:42 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 111
redjet
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 111 |
i have a 2012 f150 w/ecoboost. lots of city driving get about 15 mpg but on a hwy trip have gotten 22. pulling my 8500 lb. 35 ft travel trailer mileage is 7.5 to 9.5 depending on the wind direction. except for the mileage, I hardly know the trailers back there with the ecoboost.
Last edited by redjet; 05/07/14 05:48 AM.
|
|
Re: new f150 Crew Cab 5.0 or Ecoboost
[Re: Just James]
#9965055
05/07/14 12:22 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,167
Ambassador84
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,167 |
I have the ecoboost...couldn't be happier.
Man up. Fight the GOOD fight.
|
|
Re: new f150 Crew Cab 5.0 or Ecoboost
[Re: Just James]
#9968429
05/08/14 02:58 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,016
jfdawson
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,016 |
I have a 2013 5.0 ... No issues towing a 20' skeeter. The reason I didn't go ecoboost was cost and potential repair bill when the turbocharger blows up in 5 years.
|
|
Re: new f150 Crew Cab 5.0 or Ecoboost
[Re: jfdawson]
#9968442
05/08/14 03:00 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,491
redchevy
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,491 |
I have a 2013 5.0 ... No issues towing a 20' skeeter. The reason I didn't go ecoboost was cost and potential repair bill when the turbocharger blows up in 5 years. Diesels have turbos and are long touted for their longevity... I don't understand.
|
|
Re: new f150 Crew Cab 5.0 or Ecoboost
[Re: redchevy]
#9968470
05/08/14 03:10 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,167
Ambassador84
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,167 |
I have a 2013 5.0 ... No issues towing a 20' skeeter. The reason I didn't go ecoboost was cost and potential repair bill when the turbocharger blows up in 5 years. Diesels have turbos and are long touted for their longevity... I don't understand. ^^^this So many people are scared of the turbos on this engine...engines have been turbo charged for decades now and it's only growing in popularity...I wonder why?
Man up. Fight the GOOD fight.
|
|
Re: new f150 Crew Cab 5.0 or Ecoboost
[Re: Just James]
#9968501
05/08/14 03:20 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 265
Salty_Addict
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 265 |
This discussion has been going on ever since Ford introduced the EcoBoost. I have owned both and they best thing he can do is shop around, drive them both and then a make a decision. Both pulled my 20' bay boat without issue. At times you would forget its back there. 
|
|
Re: new f150 Crew Cab 5.0 or Ecoboost
[Re: Salty_Addict]
#9968527
05/08/14 03:26 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,491
redchevy
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,491 |
This discussion has been going on ever since Ford introduced the EcoBoost. I have owned both and they best thing he can do is shop around, drive them both and then a make a decision. Both pulled my 20' bay boat without issue. At times you would forget its back there. I also agree with this. Either will do what 100% of people in the 1/2 ton market are looking for. I have a 2011 5.3 chevy which is anemic in the power department when compared to either of those motors and Ive hauled up to 2500 lbs of feed(in the bed) and a full mounded bed of fresh cut mesquite wood that I have no clue how much it weighed, up to about 7,000 lbs on a flatbed for multiple 200 mile trips without issue. The power that the ecoboost offers at less than 2500 rpm is what draws my interest and most likely will draw my business on my next purchase. I don't like hearing 4500+ rpm with a loaded trailer behind me.
Last edited by redchevy; 05/08/14 03:27 PM.
|
|
Re: new f150 Crew Cab 5.0 or Ecoboost
[Re: Just James]
#9975328
05/11/14 01:51 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 129
gofish5252
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 129 |
Long time GM guy who switched. I have a 2012 5.0 4x4 with max tow pkg. Tows, rides and drives wonderfull. Love the truck. Went with the 5.0 due to long term repair cost. I am a shop foreman for a new car dealer. You cannot compare a gas engine turbo to a diesel turbo. Pressure vs. RPM very different. 1 eco boost turbo will run you $1500.00 for parts and around $500.00 labor. Drove both when looking saw very little difference in power or pulling. My $.o2.
|
|
Re: new f150 Crew Cab 5.0 or Ecoboost
[Re: Just James]
#9975449
05/11/14 03:09 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 9,086
Samsonsworld
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 9,086 |
You must not have put any real weight behind them if you can't tell much difference. And people keep worrying about turbo failure, yet in the real world turbo failures have been rare on the ecoboost.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|