Forums59
Topics1,056,826
Posts14,275,267
Members144,597
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
WADERS?
#9147945
07/20/13 03:03 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,052
bubba57
OP
Extreme Angler
|
OP
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,052 |
Need a lil advice. I'm slowly getting into fly fishing, been practicing around home on pounds and on the lake a lil. I'm heading up to Beavers Bend in late Sept, early Oct. for a week. Do I need chest waders to fish Mt. Fork or can I get by with my hip waders I use for duck hunting. Don't wanna go unprepared.
The Pride Of Haskel County Oklahoma.
|
|
Re: WADERS?
[Re: bubba57]
#9148014
07/20/13 03:36 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,174
Robert Hunter
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,174 |
Most places you could get away with hip,but if the boots are rubber soled it will be like ice skating in alot of places. Get a decent pair of breathable chest waders and at least if you have your belt on goo if you fall your not soaking wet.
|
|
Re: WADERS?
[Re: bubba57]
#9148031
07/20/13 03:44 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,052
bubba57
OP
Extreme Angler
|
OP
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,052 |
Is felt soles allowed on Mt. Fork? Or would studded souls be better?
Last edited by bubba57; 07/20/13 03:54 PM.
The Pride Of Haskel County Oklahoma.
|
|
Re: WADERS?
[Re: bubba57]
#9148088
07/20/13 04:20 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,571
txninja
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,571 |
I would not get felt soles, they are slowly becoming banned on many rivers. Also, I have been rockin some Magellan from academy for a couple years and they have been working great.
|
|
Re: WADERS?
[Re: bubba57]
#9148092
07/20/13 04:22 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,032
Mckinneycrappiecatcher
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,032 |
I use felt with cleats works great. Check weather when u go, it might still be warm enough to wet wade.
|
|
Re: WADERS?
[Re: bubba57]
#9160761
07/24/13 04:15 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 55
texan_fisherman
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 55 |
I've used both and both worked well enough. My old boots were felt only and they worked well on the rocks, but not so much on mud or grass.
My newer boots have the vibram rubber soles and carbide studs. They grip everything very well.
|
|
Re: WADERS?
[Re: texan_fisherman]
#9166940
07/26/13 01:31 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 910
winchester44
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 910 |
I've used both and both worked well enough. My old boots were felt only and they worked well on the rocks, but not so much on mud or grass.
My newer boots have the vibram rubber soles and carbide studs. They grip everything very well. I think there have been some re-considerations on the felt bans. Some of the major manufactures like Simms that said they would stop making felt have started again. Alaska is the only major destination that has banned them. Here are the others Maryland Missouri New Jersey Ohio has a River by river rule Rhode Island Vermont I know Didymo aka Rock Snot can be spread by as little as one cell in a shoe lace, dog hair or numerous other modes of transport with or without fishermen in the streams. Whirling spread by tiny spores as well. Between felt and rubber there is no comparison. I have the old Simms Freeston Boot(Felt) and their newest river walker (rubber). Simms and other companies claim that they have rubber soles that grip like felt or even better, but this is not true in most situations. I think the safest bet is a rubber sole with studding capability. Regardless of what you have clean your gear thoroughly if you have been fishing in a stream known to have diseases present.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|