texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Faith Nunez, KatKiller, dbwarpig, ZD Fishing, fish_15
119593 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 124,465
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 104,089
Bob Davis 95,535
John175☮ 86,126
Pilothawk 83,917
Mark Perry 74,866
Derek 🐝 68,490
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,056,735
Posts14,273,568
Members144,593
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Comments on GM 4x4 SUV's? #8695433 03/12/13 04:56 AM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,271
R
Ranger R Offline OP
TFF Team Angler
OP Offline
TFF Team Angler
R
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,271
Due to having no vehicle (After my serious roll-over accident last month), much less getting my boat back together and fishing soon on LT or Buchanan, I am looking at possibly buying a Chevy Z71, 4x4 Suburban or Tahoe. Or denali series. Any comments, Good or Bad??


Due to my job, I need to purchase a SUV. I have never owned a 4x4 Yukon or Yukon XL or Tahoe or Suburban. I noticed that the suburbans have only a 3.42 rear-end. The Z71 series have a 3.73 rear-end. Prefer the 3.73 for pulling instead of fuel economy.

The AWD denali Yukon or Yukon XL look good, but come with either a 6.0L or 6.2L V8. Any comments? Good or Bad??


I noticed a body change in 2007. Also noticed that the newer suburbans are now 6.2L V8. My destroyed GMC Yukon XL had the 5.3-V8 engine that was great to me...


I have owned three suburbans (1984 with 7.4L -V8-----1998 with 5.7-V8----2000 with 5.3L-V8) All for the most part have been great suburbans.

Robert

Re: Comments on GM 4x4 SUV's? [Re: Ranger R] #8696342 03/12/13 02:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,491
R
redchevy Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
R
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,491
I would try to avoid the AFM Active Fuel Management If I could.

Past that for general purpose use pulling a boat and economy I think the 5.3 with a 3.73 is your best option. If you dont need 4x4 dont buy it.

matt

Re: Comments on GM 4x4 SUV's? [Re: Ranger R] #8697114 03/12/13 05:58 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 27,613
P
patriot07 Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
P
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 27,613
Tahoe & suburban are both good. 5.3L is a good motor. Avoid AFM if you can, like Matt said. The 3.73 would be better for towing, but the 3.42 would be fine honestly if a bass boat is the most you'll ever tow.


Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.
- Soren Kierkegaard
Re: Comments on GM 4x4 SUV's? [Re: Ranger R] #8698408 03/12/13 11:57 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 129
D
dke42 Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
D
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 129
Why avoid the AFM?

Re: Comments on GM 4x4 SUV's? [Re: dke42] #8700259 03/13/13 01:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,491
R
redchevy Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
R
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,491
Originally Posted By: dke42
Why avoid the AFM?


No first hand experience with it, but have heard that they have an issue with oil not getting to all the top end componets of the motor when the motor goes into running on 4 cylinders.

I have a 5.3 with AFM and just rolled over 32,000 miles on mine with no problems. I wanted the 6-speed transmission and thats the only way to get it when I bought mine.

Re: Comments on GM 4x4 SUV's? [Re: Ranger R] #8700656 03/13/13 03:36 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,004
C
cuevl Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
C
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,004
I agree with Patriot07... 3.73 with the 5.3 and you should be good to go although if the boat is the most you will tow the 3.42 will do as well.


Re: Comments on GM 4x4 SUV's? [Re: redchevy] #8705657 03/14/13 05:08 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 427
H
HOU Razorback Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
H
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 427
Originally Posted By: redchevy
Originally Posted By: dke42
Why avoid the AFM?


No first hand experience with it, but have heard that they have an issue with oil not getting to all the top end componets of the motor when the motor goes into running on 4 cylinders.

I have a 5.3 with AFM and just rolled over 32,000 miles on mine with no problems. I wanted the 6-speed transmission and thats the only way to get it when I bought mine.


This is a very, very small percentage of the engines with AFM. Practically every 07 and new GM truck or SUV with the 5.3 has AFM and there are a ton of them. I've had several, so has the family and we never had an issue. I've never met with anyone that has either.

Re: Comments on GM 4x4 SUV's? [Re: HOU Razorback] #8705768 03/14/13 05:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,491
R
redchevy Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
R
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,491
Originally Posted By: HOU Razorback
Originally Posted By: redchevy
Originally Posted By: dke42
Why avoid the AFM?


No first hand experience with it, but have heard that they have an issue with oil not getting to all the top end componets of the motor when the motor goes into running on 4 cylinders.

I have a 5.3 with AFM and just rolled over 32,000 miles on mine with no problems. I wanted the 6-speed transmission and thats the only way to get it when I bought mine.


This is a very, very small percentage of the engines with AFM. Practically every 07 and new GM truck or SUV with the 5.3 has AFM and there are a ton of them. I've had several, so has the family and we never had an issue. I've never met with anyone that has either.


That is not true. The 5.3's from '07 on are not all AFM engines. I believe if you have the 4-speed auto it is a non AFM engine.

Re: Comments on GM 4x4 SUV's? [Re: redchevy] #8815135 04/11/13 03:01 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 96
N
numbersguy Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
N
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 96
I have a 2011 Denali that I pull my boat with and I love the truck. I only get about 11-12 mpg when pulling the boat but I think thats about as good as anything else. When not pulling the boat I get about as good of gas milage as any other SUV and the Denali has the big V8. Its a classy vehicle and you can't go wrong be dissapointed if you decide to get one.

Re: Comments on GM 4x4 SUV's? [Re: redchevy] #8818734 04/12/13 01:21 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 427
H
HOU Razorback Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
H
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 427
Originally Posted By: redchevy
Originally Posted By: HOU Razorback
Originally Posted By: redchevy
Originally Posted By: dke42
Why avoid the AFM?


No first hand experience with it, but have heard that they have an issue with oil not getting to all the top end componets of the motor when the motor goes into running on 4 cylinders.

I have a 5.3 with AFM and just rolled over 32,000 miles on mine with no problems. I wanted the 6-speed transmission and thats the only way to get it when I bought mine.


This is a very, very small percentage of the engines with AFM. Practically every 07 and new GM truck or SUV with the 5.3 has AFM and there are a ton of them. I've had several, so has the family and we never had an issue. I've never met with anyone that has either.


That is not true. The 5.3's from '07 on are not all AFM engines. I believe if you have the 4-speed auto it is a non AFM engine.


Nope. I had an '07 GMC Sierra Crew Cab Z71 with the 5.3 and 4 speed and it had AFM. Maybe the '07 classics didn't have AFM but the new style trucks did.

Re: Comments on GM 4x4 SUV's? [Re: redchevy] #8823867 04/14/13 03:30 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,379
K
Kristopher Douglas. Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
K
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,379
Originally Posted By: redchevy
Originally Posted By: dke42
Why avoid the AFM?


No first hand experience with it, but have heard that they have an issue with oil not getting to all the top end componets of the motor when the motor goes into running on 4 cylinders.

I have a 5.3 with AFM and just rolled over 32,000 miles on mine with no problems. I wanted the 6-speed transmission and thats the only way to get it when I bought mine.
my 09 5.3 with afm has 154k on it and it hits the rev limiter every day. no problem here. change the synth every 10k. 5600 rpm sounds so good through the magnaflow. can't wait till the 14 sierras come out.

Re: Comments on GM 4x4 SUV's? [Re: Ranger R] #8826603 04/15/13 02:30 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,197
W
WackySenko Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
W
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,197
You can turn the afm off a couple ways. I'd ditch it myself. Mileage increase is negligible to begin with and would be made up with the tune.


"Its not an addiction...its a disease! and I LIKE it! keeps my sanity in this cruel world!"
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3