Forums59
Topics1,058,089
Posts14,296,075
Members144,617
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Re: aerorator vs oxygenator
[Re: jsplinter]
#7185090
02/17/12 11:27 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,450
jsplinter
OP
TFF Team Angler
|
OP
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,450 |
Here is option number 2 instead of the cooler. it is a cooler under my front console seat (I know it needs to be cleaned up) but it is about 10 gallons. would this be large enough to keep 7 crappie alive for 8 hours? I think this option would actually be easier also.  what do you think, first option or this one?
Last edited by jsplinter; 02/17/12 11:27 PM.
|
|
Re: aerorator vs oxygenator
[Re: Holzer]
#7298471
03/17/12 06:20 PM
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 145
Kevin Spectackler
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 145 |
The Burgess Marine Aerator works really good. I've had one in my livewell for years to keep shrimp alive, all day and overnight. Also keeps Bass and Trout alive all day while we're fishing with minimal battery drain. Very few shrimp die, and I think those that do were injured or on their way out when I bought them. I also use one in a cooler for shrimp when I'm using the SUV or truck to go wadefishing. http://www.burgess-mfg.com/baitaeration.htmlI just have the unit floating in my livewell or cooler, nothing fancy. You might have to go to Burgess's office on the NW side of Houston to get one, but it will be worth your time. Looks just like a upside down Rule. They took a bilge pump and added a part that makes it float in the livewell (or cooler or bucket) upside down so that it pumps air bubbles. No hoses or tubes needed. A simple design that works extremely well to keep shrimp or fish (bait or catch) alive and doesn't have anything to clog or clean out.
|
|
Re: aerorator vs oxygenator
[Re: jsplinter]
#7300683
03/18/12 06:00 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 45,723
Big Red 12
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 45,723 |
The oxygenator is not to replace an aerator. It is to enhance it by adding O2 to the livewell, to help maintain fish and believe me they are lively with it.
|
|
Re: aerorator vs oxygenator
[Re: Big Red 12]
#7302871
03/19/12 12:05 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,450
jsplinter
OP
TFF Team Angler
|
OP
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,450 |
The oxygenator is not to replace an aerator. It is to enhance it by adding O2 to the livewell, to help maintain fish and believe me they are lively with it. So if I don't have an aerator it won't work
|
|
Re: aerorator vs oxygenator
[Re: jsplinter]
#7306536
03/19/12 08:06 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,711
Lou r Pitcher
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,711 |
Here's what we observed, read and have learned over the years of handling fish professionally in aquarium and bait tanks.
Use a livewell or aquarium circulating water pump (sometimes called an aerator pump) to circulate and mix the tank waters quickly. The low O2 waters get fully oxygenated very quickly at the surface, so it only necessary to mix the sub-surface waters with the surface waters in order to get the very max dissolved O2 throughout the water tank. (Without water mixing, the fish quickly use up the dissolved O2 and would not survive.)
The small air bubbles introduced into the incoming water stream do not add or contribute significantly to the water's total dissolved O2, but bubbles mayh be important in the incoming water stream as they can cushion the impact of the inrushing water stream force on delicate shrimp, small bait fish and such.
Injecting air bubbles, or adding even so called nano-bubbles of pure oxygen into an incoming water stream of a tank that is already having its' waters regularly re-cirulated does not put in or add any additional dissolved oxygen athough many products have marketing that indicates it.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|