texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
onlyme, sandeez, Bward, Richard Cantrell, Liteweight
119611 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 124,689
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 104,493
Bob Davis 96,326
John175☮ 86,137
Pilothawk 83,925
Mark Perry 74,867
Derek ğŸ 68,500
JDavis7873® 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,057,603
Posts14,287,354
Members144,611
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Lead ban rejected. #7175357 02/15/12 04:48 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,606
C
ChuChu1 Offline OP
TFF Team Angler
OP Offline
TFF Team Angler
C
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,606
Listening to the voices of thousands of activist anglers, on February 14, 2012, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) once again rejected the most recent petition to federally ban lead fishing tackle under the Toxic Substances Control Act. KeepAmericaFishing™ thanks everyone who took action on this important issue.


The Situation
Attempts to ban the use of lead fishing tackle have become increasingly prevalent. In November 2010, 43,000 anglers such as you helped to defeat an attempt to ban lead in fishing tackle nationwide when the EPA denied a petition to ban lead in fishing tackle. Despite the EPA's ruling, the petitioners filed a law suit against the EPA's decision and submitted a similar new petition to the agency. Thanks to you, this new petition has been defeated!
The EPA's decision demonstrates, once again, that lead fishing tackle is not harming waterfowl populations and that this is not an issue that merits a sweeping ban. Anglers are, first and foremost, some of our nation's most devoted conservationists and the EPA recognized this fact with their dismissal.
Your Help is Still Needed
Despite this monumental win for anglers nationwide, attempts to overregulate our sport have not ended. The Hunting, Fishing and Recreational Shooting Sports Protection Act (S. 838/H.R. 1558) seeks to prevent a federal ban on lead in recreational fishing tackle and helps to ensure that any future regulations on fishing tackle are established based on scientific fact instead of unjustified petitions.
With anti-fishing organizations trying to stop recreational fishing using whatever means they can, the Hunting, Fishing and Recreational Shooting Sports Protection Act is necessary to protect traditional fishing tackle, as well as ammunition, from unjustified bans that will harm the economy and reduce participation in traditional outdoor sports.



Snowflakes and entitled brats will be the doom of America!


Re: Lead ban rejected. [Re: ChuChu1] #7175454 02/15/12 05:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 177
M
mdobs Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
M
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 177
That's great news. Thanks for fighting.


Re: Lead ban rejected. [Re: ChuChu1] #7177204 02/16/12 12:56 AM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,923
B
BrianTx01 Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
B
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,923
Keep up the good fight and keep us informed.



Fighting Texas Aggie Class of 2001
Proud UNT Alumni
Re: Lead ban rejected. [Re: ChuChu1] #7178444 02/16/12 05:27 AM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,196
R
rxkid2001 Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
R
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,196
I'm all about being good to the planet but using lead tackle isn't hurting anything. If they really wanted to save our animals and environment they should petition to get fines for littering increased and enforced. I've seen way more animals hurt by litter than by lead weights.


Re: Lead ban rejected. [Re: ChuChu1] #7206594 02/23/12 03:27 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 84
B
Biffula Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
B
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 84
Originally Posted By: ChuChu1

Your Help is Still Needed
Despite this monumental win for anglers nationwide, attempts to overregulate our sport have not ended. The Hunting, Fishing and Recreational Shooting Sports Protection Act (S. 838/H.R. 1558) seeks to prevent a federal ban on lead in recreational fishing tackle and helps to ensure that any future regulations on fishing tackle are established based on scientific fact instead of unjustified petitions.
With anti-fishing organizations trying to stop recreational fishing using whatever means they can, the Hunting, Fishing and Recreational Shooting Sports Protection Act is necessary to protect traditional fishing tackle, as well as ammunition, from unjustified bans that will harm the economy and reduce participation in traditional outdoor sports.


You know what I hate about stuff like this? It's that all the kooks have to do is win one time. We have to keep fighting and winning every time they get something like this proposed. Too bad there isn't some way to make it so that rules/laws/regulations can't be reintroduced for a period of 10 or 20 years or whatever after a defeat.


Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3