Forums59
Topics1,057,603
Posts14,287,354
Members144,611
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Lead ban rejected.
#7175357
02/15/12 04:48 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,606
ChuChu1
OP
TFF Team Angler
|
OP
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,606 |
Listening to the voices of thousands of activist anglers, on February 14, 2012, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) once again rejected the most recent petition to federally ban lead fishing tackle under the Toxic Substances Control Act. KeepAmericaFishing™ thanks everyone who took action on this important issue.
The Situation Attempts to ban the use of lead fishing tackle have become increasingly prevalent. In November 2010, 43,000 anglers such as you helped to defeat an attempt to ban lead in fishing tackle nationwide when the EPA denied a petition to ban lead in fishing tackle. Despite the EPA's ruling, the petitioners filed a law suit against the EPA's decision and submitted a similar new petition to the agency. Thanks to you, this new petition has been defeated! The EPA's decision demonstrates, once again, that lead fishing tackle is not harming waterfowl populations and that this is not an issue that merits a sweeping ban. Anglers are, first and foremost, some of our nation's most devoted conservationists and the EPA recognized this fact with their dismissal. Your Help is Still Needed Despite this monumental win for anglers nationwide, attempts to overregulate our sport have not ended. The Hunting, Fishing and Recreational Shooting Sports Protection Act (S. 838/H.R. 1558) seeks to prevent a federal ban on lead in recreational fishing tackle and helps to ensure that any future regulations on fishing tackle are established based on scientific fact instead of unjustified petitions. With anti-fishing organizations trying to stop recreational fishing using whatever means they can, the Hunting, Fishing and Recreational Shooting Sports Protection Act is necessary to protect traditional fishing tackle, as well as ammunition, from unjustified bans that will harm the economy and reduce participation in traditional outdoor sports.
Snowflakes and entitled brats will be the doom of America!
|
|
Re: Lead ban rejected.
[Re: ChuChu1]
#7175454
02/15/12 05:11 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 177
mdobs
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 177 |
That's great news. Thanks for fighting.
|
|
Re: Lead ban rejected.
[Re: ChuChu1]
#7177204
02/16/12 12:56 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,923
BrianTx01
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,923 |
Keep up the good fight and keep us informed.
Fighting Texas Aggie Class of 2001 Proud UNT Alumni
|
|
Re: Lead ban rejected.
[Re: ChuChu1]
#7178444
02/16/12 05:27 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,196
rxkid2001
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,196 |
I'm all about being good to the planet but using lead tackle isn't hurting anything. If they really wanted to save our animals and environment they should petition to get fines for littering increased and enforced. I've seen way more animals hurt by litter than by lead weights.
|
|
Re: Lead ban rejected.
[Re: ChuChu1]
#7206594
02/23/12 03:27 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 84
Biffula
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 84 |
Your Help is Still Needed Despite this monumental win for anglers nationwide, attempts to overregulate our sport have not ended. The Hunting, Fishing and Recreational Shooting Sports Protection Act (S. 838/H.R. 1558) seeks to prevent a federal ban on lead in recreational fishing tackle and helps to ensure that any future regulations on fishing tackle are established based on scientific fact instead of unjustified petitions. With anti-fishing organizations trying to stop recreational fishing using whatever means they can, the Hunting, Fishing and Recreational Shooting Sports Protection Act is necessary to protect traditional fishing tackle, as well as ammunition, from unjustified bans that will harm the economy and reduce participation in traditional outdoor sports.
You know what I hate about stuff like this? It's that all the kooks have to do is win one time. We have to keep fighting and winning every time they get something like this proposed. Too bad there isn't some way to make it so that rules/laws/regulations can't be reintroduced for a period of 10 or 20 years or whatever after a defeat.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek ğŸ, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|