texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
onlyme, sandeez, Bward, Richard Cantrell, Liteweight
119611 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 124,689
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 104,495
Bob Davis 96,326
John175☮ 86,137
Pilothawk 83,925
Mark Perry 74,867
Derek 🐝 68,500
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,057,608
Posts14,287,443
Members144,611
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Is weight really that big of a factor? [Re: soje] #6915553 12/06/11 07:41 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,120
T
Troyz Online Content
Extreme Angler
Online Content
Extreme Angler
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,120
Originally Posted By: soje
Originally Posted By: RonnieManning
i think balance is more crucial than the wieght, since most the higher end rods are pretty close in ounces to each other. a lighter rod that isnt balance correctly will feel much heavier in the hand.


+1
A heavier rod may feel lighter, or give you more agility, since it has a better chance of distributing its weight evenly. In that sense a better balanced rig may put less strain on joints since it requires less force to get it moving. Basically the but end provides some counterbalance. I'm no engineer, but in my real world experience I have seen it work this way.

Personally, I consider balance before weight, and an ounce or two is only relevant if both rods being considered have similar balance.


+2. So much difference in the balance of various rods. That is why I do not like to buy a rod without handling it and putting a reel on it. I have seen some of these really popular high dollar rods that felt terrible because they had poor balance. That applies to some production rods as well as to some custom made rods.

A better balanced outfit also is a big help in making longer and/or accurate casts.


Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: Is weight really that big of a factor? [Re: Feljum Shwarper] #6915579 12/06/11 07:49 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,241
J
John A. Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
J
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,241
I agree with the balance point. I don't like heavy rods and reels but most middle to high end equipment is fairly close in weight. I would much rather fish a moderatly heavy rod and reel than a Steez and very light rod that is not balanced well.


Re: Is weight really that big of a factor? [Re: Feljum Shwarper] #6915678 12/06/11 08:16 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46
B
bassin'Nick Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
B
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46
When you've been around as I have and fished for over 60 years, you've seen the huge improvement in even the bottom end of rods and reels. For me, balance is and always has been more important than just weight. I have a couple of flipping sticks I've ADDED weight to an already heavy rod to put balance point right under reel. I can use these rods longer and with less fatigue then light rods that are forward biased on weight.

As for balance and feel, I recently bought a combo outfit with the first St. Croix spin rod I've used. I bought it because a friend so highly recommended St. Croix as a mid-priced but high end rod. It just doesn't balance well and I'm disappointed in it. I'm sure they make some great rods since so many in the north swear by them, but I have lower cost rods from other mfg'ers that just FEEL so much better.



Catching a fish is great. Riding there on your bike just makes it better.
Re: Is weight really that big of a factor? [Re: Feljum Shwarper] #6915702 12/06/11 08:26 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,494
C
Chad711 Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
C
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,494
I've gone fishing for 12 and 15 hours straight before, actually one time i fished for 18 hours straight (at Fork, fished sunrise then picked up my buddy and fished until midnight).

So yeah when fishing all day I want something that is going to be easy on my arms after a long day.


Re: Is weight really that big of a factor? [Re: Feljum Shwarper] #6915718 12/06/11 08:32 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,011
S
soje Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
S
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,011
I feel like a samurai with a well balanced rig in my hand.





like the man says...if you're swimming in the ocean and get bitten by a shark, its not a shark attack. You're in THEIR neighborhood. If you're at home in your shower, turn around and a shark is in there with you...THAT'S a shark attack
Re: Is weight really that big of a factor? [Re: Feljum Shwarper] #6915735 12/06/11 08:38 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 528
F
Feljum Shwarper Offline OP
Pro Angler
OP Offline
Pro Angler
F
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 528
I hear the fish scream while giving the smelly pirate hookset!!

Good post and nice debates...thanks all for the input.


Re: Is weight really that big of a factor? [Re: Feljum Shwarper] #6915737 12/06/11 08:39 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 683
B
Bassen Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
B
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 683
The Lighter the rod the better.
It's got to have a long handel, I don't like the shorter handels.
Balance is most importante


Re: Is weight really that big of a factor? [Re: Feljum Shwarper] #6915784 12/06/11 08:54 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 775
W
Wafflejaw Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
W
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 775
The better the balance,the better the bite detection.
Especially on tip up applications.

Weight is overrated.


Re: Is weight really that big of a factor? [Re: Feljum Shwarper] #6915805 12/06/11 08:59 PM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 142
K
kayaker_tye Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
K
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 142
From my experience, it is a bad idea to pick up a Steez rod and reel combo...LOL

Balance and weight make a difference when fishing long hours. Also, sensitivity is usually better with a lighter rod. Rod size is also important when choosing a style of fishing. Lighter lures and worms can be thrown on lighter rigs with better sensitivity and control. Heavy jigs thrown in thick cover require a heavier setup.



-Tye

Let's Fish!
Re: Is weight really that big of a factor? [Re: Feljum Shwarper] #6915836 12/06/11 09:09 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,800
F
FZ1 Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
F
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,800
Fatigue. It's weight and balance. I have a note from my doctor that says I am required to fish only GLX rods and Steez reels.


Re: Is weight really that big of a factor? [Re: Feljum Shwarper] #6915840 12/06/11 09:11 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 55,498
SkeeterRonnie Offline
Super Freak
Offline
Super Freak
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 55,498
must be a quack doctor...


Re: Is weight really that big of a factor? [Re: Feljum Shwarper] #6915921 12/06/11 09:31 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 934
T
Todd Castledine Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
T
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 934
I pay ZERO attention to weight if its the right rod its the right rod. I throw a lot of big baits so big rods are gonna weigh. My buddy and I laugh about this a lot. Its not that much weight to begin with. I do believe in balance like some have said its all about how it feels with whatever your doing.





Re: Is weight really that big of a factor? [Re: Feljum Shwarper] #6916555 12/07/11 01:05 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,533
2
210amatuerangler Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
2
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,533
I would suggeat getting a gym membership instead of a $400 lightweight reel that's only going to shave off maybe 2 oz from the weight. Another benefit to this is you will start looking like RedRanger with this technique...



Originally Posted By: Scott N
You know the old saying

If it floats, flys, or f___s it is always cheaper to rent!

You have to decide which is more important.
Re: Is weight really that big of a factor? [Re: FZ1] #6916564 12/07/11 01:09 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 760
C
cali kid Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
C
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 760
Your doctor must have never tried Dobyns...


Re: Is weight really that big of a factor? [Re: 210amatuerangler] #6916581 12/07/11 01:14 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,751
P
PayneFish Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
P
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,751
Originally Posted By: 210amatuerangler
I would suggeat getting a gym membership instead of a $400 lightweight reel that's only going to shave off maybe 2 oz from the weight. Another benefit to this is you will start looking like RedRanger with this technique...


It's 4.3 oz difference or a quarter pound. If you cast once a minute over a 12hr day, that an extra 180 pounds of force exerted weight per day. The wear and tear on the carpal and metacarpal bones will cause issues as well as potential bursitis, arthritis and an aggravated ulnar nerve. I don't need a gym membership. I need longevity of muscles, tendons and bones. Thanks though.

I'm talking reels: calcutta 400 versus Revo Winch. Big difference in weight and ergonomics.


Last edited by PayneFish; 12/07/11 01:18 AM.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3