|
Forums59
Topics1,056,714
Posts14,273,152
Members144,593
| |
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
 What would you do?
#6804221
11/03/11 02:17 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 57
Don Bruner
OP
Outdoorsman
|
|
OP
Outdoorsman
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 57 |
I caught this on Pines Monday. It's the biggest one I've caught this year. It measured 22 1/2" and by my cheap azz scale it showed just over 5#. I looked at a conversion scale and a bass of that length shows to be 6.89#. Now if I'm gonna brag about this one what weight would use? 
I can do better---I just never have.
|
|
 Re: What would you do?
[Re: Don Bruner]
#6804229
11/03/11 02:19 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 57
Don Bruner
OP
Outdoorsman
|
|
OP
Outdoorsman
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 57 |
Well carp!! I thought the pic would show up in the post  I figured out how to add pic
Last edited by Don Bruner; 11/03/11 11:45 PM.
I can do better---I just never have.
|
|
|
Re: What would you do?
[Re: Don Bruner]
#6804231
11/03/11 02:19 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 55,496
SkeeterRonnie
Super Freak
|
|
Super Freak
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 55,496 |
5 pounds. pictures are deceiving though! SO I give you 1.5 pounds!! we shall call it 6.5# !!!  Nice feesh regardless!
|
|
|
Re: What would you do?
[Re: SkeeterRonnie]
#6804235
11/03/11 02:20 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,312
BoomBoom
Extreme Angler
|
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,312 |
Do what all fisherman do, lie! 
|
|
|
Re: What would you do?
[Re: Don Bruner]
#6804236
11/03/11 02:21 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 295
TheShafer
Angler
|
|
Angler
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 295 |
Its pretty thin and long, but none the less, a nice pines bass. Just say it was somewhere between 5 and 6. BTW... I know your secret spot now... you didnt black out the background like those jacks in the catfish forum!
The road goes on forever and the party never ends...
|
|
|
Re: What would you do?
[Re: TheShafer]
#6804248
11/03/11 02:24 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 57
Don Bruner
OP
Outdoorsman
|
|
OP
Outdoorsman
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 57 |
[quote=TheShafer]Its pretty thin and long, but none the less, a nice pines bass.
I thought the same also, When it first jumped my first thought was 6+ until I got it in the boat. I guess it was so hungry it would fall for anything thrown it's way.
I can do better---I just never have.
|
|
|
Re: What would you do?
[Re: Don Bruner]
#6804370
11/03/11 02:59 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15,137
txwhitetail
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15,137 |
I think your scale is probably about right. Nice Fish.
When you look at a length/weight chart it is showing you what an ideal/100% weight is for the length. This time of year it would be hard to hit 100% on a lot of fish.
|
|
 Re: What would you do?
[Re: Don Bruner]
#6804409
11/03/11 03:07 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 57
Don Bruner
OP
Outdoorsman
|
|
OP
Outdoorsman
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 57 |
JR, that's about what I thought--I really just wanted to try posting a pic AND make Slodsm jealous.
I can do better---I just never have.
|
|
|
Re: What would you do?
[Re: Don Bruner]
#6804604
11/03/11 03:57 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,417
James_C
Extreme Angler
|
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,417 |
Those conversion charts are assuming the fish is in perfect health their close but not always accurate.
What I would do is over shoot your weight by about 3 lbs, just to see the responses you'll get from everyone, loL.
James C.
"You can't blame the worm fer not wantin to go fishin"
|
|
|
Re: What would you do?
[Re: Don Bruner]
#6804939
11/03/11 05:18 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,548
Marooned
Extreme Angler
|
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,548 |
Don't know if you measured the girth, but the weight calculators use the girth of the fish as well as the length. Most fish weight calculators assume a length to girth ratio of about 1.7 for an average bass. But that ratio doesn't hold very well for fatter or skinnier fish. I caught one a few years ago that was 22 1/2" long and went 7.4 lb., so 6.9lb. is very reasonable for that length in my opinion. Spring-type mechanical scales get off easily; digital scales are more reliable in general.
In memory of my childhood friend Dan Sterling, who taught me at an early age how to catch bream with a hand-line, and who unknowingly hooked me on fishing for life.
|
|
|
Re: What would you do?
[Re: Don Bruner]
#6805888
11/03/11 09:31 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,850
Ban-D
TFF Celebrity
|
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,850 |
I had a fish this weekend in a tournament when deciding to cull the 15 3/4 was heavier than the 17 inch fish . Texas parks and wildlife shows a way to make sure your scales are accurate most of the berkley electric scales I've used are about 3oz off.
|
|
|
Re: What would you do?
[Re: Don Bruner]
#6806003
11/03/11 10:07 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 74,866
Mark Perry
Super Freak
|
|
Super Freak
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 74,866 |
There is not a scale made that i would trust for culling. To me its balance beam only. Its fast and easy and never has a dead battery.
|
|
|
Re: What would you do?
[Re: Mark Perry]
#6806033
11/03/11 10:15 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,878
CrankBait1007
Extreme Angler
|
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,878 |
5 lbs is always a good fish so congrats
[img] [/img]
Sometimes I wish i never picked that rod up!
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|
