texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Bestwayrv, MWS76087, edjones, Muser282, BNICK
119568 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 124,211
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 103,693
Bob Davis 94,604
John175☮ 86,122
Pilothawk 83,898
Mark Perry 74,751
Derek 🐝 68,476
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,055,671
Posts14,256,498
Members144,568
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
Fluorocarbon - is it all hype? #6160309 05/08/11 10:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 328
Eland Slayer Offline OP
Angler
OP Offline
Angler
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 328
Alright guys.....I thought I would share the results of a little test I did this afternoon.

Due to my recent break-offs with two big fish on Lake Fork in the last month.....I was looking for a line to replace my good ol' Stren Original low-viz green monofilament. Obviously everyone said switch to fluorocarbon. A number of the guides here on TFF and others recommended Seaguar InvisX.....which is supposed to be much more abrasion resistant.

So I asked an employee at Academy for a 3 foot sample of the 20# Seaguar so that I could run a little test. At home, I also cut a 3 foot section of my 20# Stren Original. I did my own "abrasion resistance" test on the bricks of my house. And the results are.....

1. With the same amount of force used and the same technique.....the Seaguar was 200-300% MORE FRAYED than the Stren was. I definitely was not expecting that.

2. I then tested the break strength of both. I wasn't using a scale, but you could not tell the difference in the amount of force required to break either.

I will note that the fluoro had much less stretch than the mono.....and I am aware of the fact that it's supposed to be invisible in the water, and that it sinks. So, I'm not saying it's worthless, not at all. I just don't believe it is any more abrasion resistant than monofilament is. So is it REALLY worth 3-4 times the cost of mono?

You tell me.....

Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: Fluorocarbon - is it all hype? [Re: Eland Slayer] #6160326 05/08/11 10:18 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,792
R
RedRaider3933 Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
R
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,792
Yes. I just started using fluoro frequently after using mono forever. My hook up ratio is ridiculously better, I have yet to break it on a hook set (which I would do quite a bit with mono), and I have gotten a lot more bites with fluoro. Its also much easier to cast and much more sensitive than mono.

The fluoro vs. mono debate is like the tungsten vs. lead debate. A lot of people will support both sides. It all comes down to what works for you, and what you are most confident with. It that means throwing mono then so be it.


Go Tech
Re: Fluorocarbon - is it all hype? [Re: Eland Slayer] #6160329 05/08/11 10:20 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,721
B
brokenjeep Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
B
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,721
I like Floro for the sensitivity and lack of stretch even though it will fray more, that is why I buy it in 2000yd spools and re-spool and re-tie often.

I use mono for top water and cranks.

When you fish Fork and want to catch big fish you should expect to buy more line.

Re: Fluorocarbon - is it all hype? [Re: brokenjeep] #6160335 05/08/11 10:22 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,015
5
5Redman8 Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
5
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,015
Was it soaked wet or did you try the test dry.

TackleTour.com has done their own series of tests.....

Tests don't mean squat.....real life does!

Re: Fluorocarbon - is it all hype? [Re: Eland Slayer] #6160349 05/08/11 10:26 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 988
K
kamerai Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
K
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 988
I use Flouro when I feel that sensitivity is key, (Jigs, Worms, soft plastics). Over the years I have developed confidence in the line, however, I still use Stren Mono on spinnerbaits, topwater and some crankbait. I feel that your test are right on, however, the positives far outway the negatives. Check your line often.

Re: Fluorocarbon - is it all hype? [Re: kamerai] #6160368 05/08/11 10:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 74,751
Mark Perry Online Content
Super Freak
Online Content
Super Freak
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 74,751
Compare line diameter to line diameter and not lb test ize. Chances are the mono was a LOT bigger in diameter so it renders a head to head test flawed.

Re: Fluorocarbon - is it all hype? [Re: 5Redman8] #6160375 05/08/11 10:33 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 16,992
E
ezbassin Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
E
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 16,992
Originally Posted By: 5Redman8
Was it soaked wet or did you try the test dry.

TackleTour.com has done their own series of tests.....

Tests don't mean squat.....real life does!



I agree. Some of the lines that "tested" better than others in the TackleTour test were not better in actual "real world, on the water" usage.

Re: Fluorocarbon - is it all hype? [Re: ezbassin] #6160474 05/08/11 11:06 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,734
F
Fish AKA Jerry Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
F
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,734
Gee..how did we ever catch a stupid fish in the old days?? Line,baits,rods,reels, I tend to believe that most people tend to over think things just a little.




FREYED KNOT

Re: Fluorocarbon - is it all hype? [Re: Fish AKA Jerry] #6160482 05/08/11 11:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 515
Dude Lebowski Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 515
The sensitivity of flourocarbon is unbelievable. You can feel the slightest "tick".


Re: Fluorocarbon - is it all hype? [Re: Dude Lebowski] #6160522 05/08/11 11:20 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,772
Outdoordude Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,772
I trust that you did your test with no bias and that your results are sound, but I'm not too worried about an artificial abrasion test because the large fish that I've pulled out of "there's no way in ----" situations using Seaguar CarbonPro have proven more to me than any test result. I'm happy to pay 20-25 bucks a pack for something I know wont let me down.


Scott Jones
Re: Fluorocarbon - is it all hype? [Re: Dude Lebowski] #6160538 05/08/11 11:26 PM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 25
C
crazyoutdoorsman Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
C
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 25
Really this is just a debate of what people have more confidence in. Many people, including myself, feel that fluorocarbon helps catch more fish, but honestly it doesn't make a huge difference in most situations when compared to a quality monofilament.However, weightless plastics are an exception as the sinking properties of fluorocarbon greatly enhance the sensitivity of the rig. Bottom line is that fluorocarbon lines(especially invisx) are worth a shot, but if you have a line that you have a great deal of confidence in there is no real NEED to switch, but it might help. Good luck wink
just my 2 cents

Re: Fluorocarbon - is it all hype? [Re: crazyoutdoorsman] #6160548 05/08/11 11:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 78
P
Procowboy Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
P
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 78
I have just recently started using Florocarbon line. It seems to have ALOT of memory. Every time it comes off the reel on every cast, its all kinked up. Seems worse than the old mono. Just my opinion.

Re: Fluorocarbon - is it all hype? [Re: Fish AKA Jerry] #6160580 05/08/11 11:45 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,096
T
Ted Dyer Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
T
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,096
Originally Posted By: Fish AKA Jerry
Gee..how did we ever catch a stupid fish in the old days?? Line,baits,rods,reels, I tend to believe that most people tend to over think things just a little.


What he said!


flagtexas
The world is changed by your example, not by your opinion.
Re: Fluorocarbon - is it all hype? [Re: Fish AKA Jerry] #6160877 05/09/11 01:21 AM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 4,584
lamoon78 Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 4,584
Originally Posted By: Fish AKA Jerry
Gee..how did we ever catch a stupid fish in the old days?? Line,baits,rods,reels, I tend to believe that most people tend to over think things just a little.
Exactly what I was thinking I have tried different kinds of Floro and known are worth a darn if you ask me I just stick with my mono and braid.

Re: Fluorocarbon - is it all hype? [Re: Procowboy] #6160909 05/09/11 01:29 AM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,792
R
RedRaider3933 Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
R
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,792
Originally Posted By: Procowboy
I have just recently started using Florocarbon line. It seems to have ALOT of memory. Every time it comes off the reel on every cast, its all kinked up. Seems worse than the old mono. Just my opinion.

Use line treatment when ever you spool it on the reel. Give it 2 or 3 good sprays 2 or 3 times during the spooling process and helps with memory big time. It will also help the fluoro last longer.


Go Tech
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3