texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
CrankyVet, Cowtownhound, Bob81, juan2025, Mjlucky
119648 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 125,168
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 105,375
Bob Davis 97,564
John175☮ 86,148
Pilothawk 83,939
Mark Perry 74,893
Derek 🐝 68,517
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,059,273
Posts14,317,114
Members144,648
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Lewisville Question #531341 08/30/04 03:59 AM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 135
iwannablikeron Offline OP
Outdoorsman
OP Offline
Outdoorsman
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 135
What's the safest route from 121 cut to Lake Dallas cut? I know there are trees down there between them. I usually head toward Twin Trees then bear right to Lake Dallas cut but I wonder if that is a waste of time.


Re: Lewisville Question #531342 08/30/04 04:50 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 333
Y
yournamehere Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
Y
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 333
Right now, it is a waste of time - go right to the cut. When the water level drops a couple of feet, stick to your current path, and deal with the few minutes you loose.

http://www.swf-wc.usace.army.mil/reports/fish.htm

When we're at the normal level, it's all good - when we're low, do what you're doing - there is no better path.

Re: Lewisville Question #531343 08/30/04 05:09 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 333
Y
yournamehere Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
Y
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 333
After giving it some more thought, I changed my mind. My recommendation would be to stick with what you're doing now. That is the course I would take if I were driving your boat. Better safe than sorry!

Stump city is unforgiving.

Re: Lewisville Question #531344 08/30/04 03:14 PM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,195
Mark C Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,195
I think the route you're going is the way to go. A couple of minutes saved is not worth tearing up your boat. On rare occasions, I will cut across the middle but only if I'm in a real hurry (like trying to outrun a storm) or the wind is just howling and it's too rough to run my normal route. Never when the lake is below normal pool. Those of us that have been fishing LL a long time remember what it looked like before they raised the lake 8' back in the late 1980's - stump city. There used to be a line of pretty closely spaced buoys running east-west and north-south marking the stumps way back when - anybody remember that? It just makes me too nervous running through there even though a lot of people do it.


Originally Posted by TexasBlonde
You are not a good or nice person.





Re: Lewisville Question #531345 08/30/04 03:35 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 672
Drifter Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 672
In 1996\7 when the lake was down to 507 I took a couple of weekends marking the outline of the forests in the main body of LL with a GPS.

I have that set of waypoints in Garmin format and a simple map that transfers the waypoints to something that you can recognize. I would be more than happy share it with anyone interested. It does not show individual trees, but the outline of the areas where the trees are present.

Re: Lewisville Question #531346 08/31/04 12:25 AM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 135
iwannablikeron Offline OP
Outdoorsman
OP Offline
Outdoorsman
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 135
Drifter,

You sent me that information a while back and it is good. Thanks again. I have some tree lines saved on my GPS from it. I see people blowing right through there when I know from your information that there are trees down there. I wondered if I was being too cautious or if these guys know something I don't.


Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2025 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3