texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Willy91, Anchormarina, laddikey, Ab2, Dyno
119601 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 124,532
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 104,256
Bob Davis 95,753
John175☮ 86,126
Pilothawk 83,922
Mark Perry 74,867
Derek 🐝 68,495
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,057,009
Posts14,278,404
Members144,601
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: mono vs co polymer [Re: Lake Fork Guide Marc Mitchell] #4489578 02/14/10 02:52 AM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 906
H
hargefish Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
H
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 906
Hmm, saw some of that mustad line on ebay, might just have to try some out, great price for bulk.

Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: mono vs co polymer [Re: hargefish] #4489618 02/14/10 03:02 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 26,650
senko9S Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 26,650
p-line cx premium is good stuff, never tried the mustad line.

Re: mono vs co polymer [Re: senko9S] #4489709 02/14/10 03:32 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46
B
bassin'Nick Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
B
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46
I know this is coming from a little different angle but every time I read a discussion about fishing lines it reminds me of the many 'OIL threads" on motorcycle boards. Nothing is ever settled but lots of opinions get stated, backed up by some, torn down by others. :-)

By the way, the low stretch of floro stated by Marc is disputed in tests on another thread almost next to this one.


Catching a fish is great. Riding there on your bike just makes it better.
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3