texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Faith Nunez, KatKiller, dbwarpig, ZD Fishing, fish_15
119593 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 124,453
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 104,054
Bob Davis 95,473
John175☮ 86,126
Pilothawk 83,916
Mark Perry 74,866
Derek 🐝 68,490
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,056,689
Posts14,272,757
Members144,593
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
X510c Vs. 777c2 #1657100 10/09/07 12:40 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 502
O
olefolks Offline OP
Pro Angler
OP Offline
Pro Angler
O
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 502
I'm replacing my TM depth finder. I'm kind of leaning toward the 777c2 because of the 60* cone as opposed to 20* on the Lowrance. I like the picture of the Lowrance over the Humminbird. Sure would appreciate some input from anyone that has either of the depth finders.

Re: X510c Vs. 777c2 [Re: olefolks] #1657990 10/09/07 06:31 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,208
MrG Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,208
I have the x510c and you are correct. The images are awesome. It doesn't seem to have any trouble finding fish. It finds trees too but it's pretty easy to tell the difference.


Chief net thrower for Team Sharc Bait
2011 TSA Team of the Year.
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3