texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
noah.j.7, Mike Hall, SOFdude, onlyme, sandeez
119614 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 124,734
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 104,565
Bob Davis 96,450
John175☮ 86,137
Pilothawk 83,925
Mark Perry 74,867
Derek 🐝 68,501
JDavis7873� 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,057,779
Posts14,290,484
Members144,614
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: NASA new study challenges 30’years of climate science.. [Re: grandbassslayer] #15374276 04/10/25 07:32 PM
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 606
M
Marion Morrison Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
M
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 606
Water molecules get recycled in two weeks post from above raises a question.

If we live in an atmospheric bubble meaning no air escapes the planet, isn't the amount of water finite meaning there is X amount of water whether it is underground, walking around in humans/animals, in ice, or in clouds/vapor. If so, if we have a drought here in S Tx, it is feasible to assume, somewhere else on earth is getting an unusual amount of rain. So in theory, there never is a water shortage on the planet, it just moves around from time to time. I am sure this is as simple as it gets but even as we die, the water in our bodies is returned to the planet.

Re: NASA new study challenges 30’years of climate science.. [Re: Jimbo] #15374351 04/10/25 09:09 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 81,114
banker-always fishing Offline
Pumpkin Head
Offline
Pumpkin Head
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 81,114
Originally Posted by Jimbo
As long as there is money to be made, the scammers are going to scam.



And it's not going stop unless someone is held accountable. police


[Linked Image][Linked Image]

IGFA World Record Rio Grande Cichlid. Lake Dunlap.

John 3:16

Sinner's Prayer. God forgive me a sinner. I accept Jesus Christ as my Savior !
Re: NASA new study challenges 30’years of climate science.. [Re: grandbassslayer] #15374369 04/10/25 09:35 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,877
P
Pat Goff Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
P
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,877
Points to ponder.
The CO2 number is ridiculous to even think it could have any impact on the climate.

It’s convenient because it’s a bogeyman number that they can use to try to support their goals for world order.
We’ve seen just as credible studies that show
The sun is hotter
The earth has wobbled on its axis
Or the one that really makes heads explode. The cell phone RG energy is heating the planet.
Now what?
All more plausible than soda pop fizz.


Pat Goff
Seadrift TX
[Linked Image]
Re: NASA new study challenges 30’years of climate science.. [Re: butch sanders] #15374553 04/11/25 02:46 AM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 19,816
C
COFF Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
C
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 19,816
Originally Posted by butch sanders
Originally Posted by 1oldbassguy
Originally Posted by Pat Goff
You know they’re lying when you ask the “scientists” the basic question.
If human CO2 goes to zero what changes?
Crickets.



95% of all climate scientist agree with who ever pays them


where did you come up with this figure?

I know right? Seems low to me too.


[Linked Image]
Re: NASA new study challenges 30’years of climate science.. [Re: COFF] #15374567 04/11/25 03:07 AM
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,495
S
Slicefixer Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
S
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,495
Originally Posted by COFF
Originally Posted by butch sanders
Originally Posted by 1oldbassguy
Originally Posted by Pat Goff
You know they’re lying when you ask the “scientists” the basic question.
If human CO2 goes to zero what changes?
Crickets.



95% of all climate scientist agree with who ever pays them


where did you come up with this figure?

I know right? Seems low to me too.


Should be "97"...😉


Gj
Re: NASA new study challenges 30’years of climate science.. [Re: grandbassslayer] #15374570 04/11/25 03:39 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,168
MARKIT Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,168
It is a more complex system than previously thought “

I wonder how many millions we spent to figure this out

Most a holes in Texas sitting on their couch knew this

Re: NASA new study challenges 30’years of climate science.. [Re: Fishin' Nut] #15374726 04/11/25 01:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,877
P
Pat Goff Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
P
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,877
Originally Posted by Fishin' Nut
Originally Posted by Pat Goff
The mistake they made was trying to convince everyone that CO2 is some sort of pollutant. Instead of a vital part of life.

Then doubling down on stupid trying to lie about the effects.

[Linked Image]


Water molecules get recycled after about two weeks. It releases its heat via precipitation. CO2 can remain in the atmosphere for hundreds of years as a heat absorbing molecule. But science was never your strong subject.
Link


Your level of stupidity never ceases to amaze.
What body cavity did you pull that nonsense from?
Just to expose exactly how retarded what you just said, answer the question.
CO2 is 0.000004% of the atmosphere
Humans produce 3% of all the CO2 on the planet.
Those are facts.
If we take away 3% of 0.000004, what changes?
Simple question.
The core part of all of this climate science scam.
If you can’t answer that, then admit you’re clueless.
And just a parrot repeating what you’ve been told to repeat.


Pat Goff
Seadrift TX
[Linked Image]
Re: NASA new study challenges 30’years of climate science.. [Re: Pat Goff] #15374740 04/11/25 01:43 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,338
M
MBradford Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
M
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,338
Originally Posted by Pat Goff
Originally Posted by Fishin' Nut
Originally Posted by Pat Goff
The mistake they made was trying to convince everyone that CO2 is some sort of pollutant. Instead of a vital part of life.

Then doubling down on stupid trying to lie about the effects.

[Linked Image]


Water molecules get recycled after about two weeks. It releases its heat via precipitation. CO2 can remain in the atmosphere for hundreds of years as a heat absorbing molecule. But science was never your strong subject.
Link


Your level of stupidity never ceases to amaze.
What body cavity did you pull that nonsense from?
Just to expose exactly how retarded what you just said, answer the question.
CO2 is 0.000004% of the atmosphere
Humans produce 3% of all the CO2 on the planet.
Those are facts.
If we take away 3% of 0.000004, what changes?
Simple question.
The core part of all of this climate science scam.
If you can’t answer that, then admit you’re clueless.
And just a parrot repeating what you’ve been told to repeat.


Oh, the irony...

Re: NASA new study challenges 30’years of climate science.. [Re: MBradford] #15374764 04/11/25 02:11 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 15,220
D
DanXB-21 Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
D
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 15,220
Originally Posted by MBradford
... Oh, the irony...


Yep, sure is... The Glo-Bull warming crowd had nothing but insults... Dan roflmao


"The problem with having a sense of humor is often that people you use it on aren't in a very good mood"...
Lou Holtz
Re: NASA new study challenges 30’years of climate science.. [Re: grandbassslayer] #15374779 04/11/25 02:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,877
P
Pat Goff Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
P
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,877
[Linked Image]


Pat Goff
Seadrift TX
[Linked Image]
Re: NASA new study challenges 30’years of climate science.. [Re: grandbassslayer] #15374783 04/11/25 02:32 PM
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,469
Q
Quillback Online Content
Extreme Angler
Online Content
Extreme Angler
Q
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,469
roflmao^^^^

Re: NASA new study challenges 30’years of climate science.. [Re: grandbassslayer] #15374800 04/11/25 02:47 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,338
M
MBradford Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
M
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,338
[Linked Image]

Re: NASA new study challenges 30’years of climate science.. [Re: MBradford] #15374817 04/11/25 03:06 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 96,450
B
Bob Davis Offline
Bunkeroid Bob
Offline
Bunkeroid Bob
B
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 96,450
Originally Posted by MBradford
[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]


[Linked Image]


[Linked Image]




Re: NASA new study challenges 30’years of climate science.. [Re: grandbassslayer] #15374850 04/11/25 04:08 PM
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 16,344
G
grandbassslayer Offline OP
TFF Guru
OP Offline
TFF Guru
G
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 16,344
Lol

Re: NASA new study challenges 30’years of climate science.. [Re: grandbassslayer] #15374866 04/11/25 04:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,877
P
Pat Goff Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
P
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,877
Blah blah blah
Squawk squawk squawk.

I asked a basic and logical answer, any of you climate science nerds should be able to answer in three seconds.
Instead you revert to your primal instincts, and flail around.
Your lack of logic is telling.

[Linked Image]


Pat Goff
Seadrift TX
[Linked Image]
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3