Forums59
Topics1,057,653
Posts14,288,290
Members144,611
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Jared
#15353785
03/13/25 08:32 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 104,506
Bigbob_FTW
OP
Big Sprocket Bob
|
OP
Big Sprocket Bob
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 104,506 |
|
|
Re: Jared
[Re: Bigbob_FTW]
#15353790
03/13/25 08:38 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,045
Jaredk
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,045 |
Don’t get me started. I’m a Boeing guy but enough is enough.
The 46 has been a trash program. I did some flight testing to get our receiver qual behind them and it was interesting to say the least. ALOT of boom strikes. Their camera system whitewashes out all the white and light gray jets in a lot of different scenarios. Israel’s 707 tanker has used a camera system for a very long time so it’s not like it’s “new” technology.
I am hoping I get to jump on DALs first MAX10 delivery though!
|
|
Re: Jared
[Re: Jaredk]
#15353796
03/13/25 08:47 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 104,506
Bigbob_FTW
OP
Big Sprocket Bob
|
OP
Big Sprocket Bob
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 104,506 |
Don’t get me started. I’m a Boeing guy but enough is enough.
The 46 has been a trash program. I did some flight testing to get our receiver qual behind them and it was interesting to say the least. ALOT of boom strikes. Their camera system whitewashes out all the white and light gray jets in a lot of different scenarios. Israel’s 707 tanker has used a camera system for a very long time so it’s not like it’s “new” technology.
I am hoping I get to jump on DALs first MAX10 delivery though! Is boomer position an issue? I presume it's KC-10 like?
|
|
Re: Jared
[Re: Bigbob_FTW]
#15353797
03/13/25 08:50 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,045
Jaredk
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,045 |
Don’t get me started. I’m a Boeing guy but enough is enough.
The 46 has been a trash program. I did some flight testing to get our receiver qual behind them and it was interesting to say the least. ALOT of boom strikes. Their camera system whitewashes out all the white and light gray jets in a lot of different scenarios. Israel’s 707 tanker has used a camera system for a very long time so it’s not like it’s “new” technology.
I am hoping I get to jump on DALs first MAX10 delivery though! Is boomer position an issue? I presume it's KC-10 like? Nope. Boom sits in the cockpit and looks at a screen!
|
|
Re: Jared
[Re: Jaredk]
#15353801
03/13/25 08:53 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 104,506
Bigbob_FTW
OP
Big Sprocket Bob
|
OP
Big Sprocket Bob
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 104,506 |
Don’t get me started. I’m a Boeing guy but enough is enough.
The 46 has been a trash program. I did some flight testing to get our receiver qual behind them and it was interesting to say the least. ALOT of boom strikes. Their camera system whitewashes out all the white and light gray jets in a lot of different scenarios. Israel’s 707 tanker has used a camera system for a very long time so it’s not like it’s “new” technology.
I am hoping I get to jump on DALs first MAX10 delivery though! Is boomer position an issue? I presume it's KC-10 like? Nope. Boom sits in the cockpit and looks at a screen!  kind of like when they moved the gunner forward on the buff.
|
|
Re: Jared
[Re: Bigbob_FTW]
#15353804
03/13/25 08:55 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,045
Jaredk
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,045 |
Don’t get me started. I’m a Boeing guy but enough is enough.
The 46 has been a trash program. I did some flight testing to get our receiver qual behind them and it was interesting to say the least. ALOT of boom strikes. Their camera system whitewashes out all the white and light gray jets in a lot of different scenarios. Israel’s 707 tanker has used a camera system for a very long time so it’s not like it’s “new” technology.
I am hoping I get to jump on DALs first MAX10 delivery though! Is boomer position an issue? I presume it's KC-10 like? Nope. Boom sits in the cockpit and looks at a screen!  kind of like when they moved the gunner forward on the buff. Yea. It seems crazy to me but Israel has been doing it for years https://www.twz.com/air/our-best-look-so-far-inside-israelis-once-secretive-707-tankers
|
|
Re: Jared
[Re: Bigbob_FTW]
#15353806
03/13/25 09:00 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,788
Douglas J
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,788 |
It's almost criminal the quality of materials that some manufacturers seem to be using these days to keep up the profits.
![[Linked Image]](https://texasfishingforum.com/forums/pics/userpics/2024/11/full-72311-248284-f6b1190b_bbab_49d4_a1b2_6e9a1ce426f7.jpeg) #MFGA
|
|
Re: Jared
[Re: Bigbob_FTW]
#15353809
03/13/25 09:07 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 38
RedHossO3
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 38 |
I didn’t think the KC-10’s were still in operation- as of September’24 there are apparently still 2 flying based on an online article.
Appears the KC-135 gonna be on the same plan as the Buff - keep retrograding/fitting and fly into perpetuity.
|
|
Re: Jared
[Re: RedHossO3]
#15353813
03/13/25 09:11 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,045
Jaredk
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,045 |
I didn’t think the KC-10’s were still in operation- as of September’24 there are apparently still 2 flying based on an online article.
Appears the KC-135 gonna be on the same plan as the Buff - keep retrograding/fitting and fly into perpetuity.
KC-10s retired from military use last year. Omega (contract aerial refueling) still has two, along with a KC-707
Last edited by Jaredk; 03/13/25 09:12 PM.
|
|
Re: Jared
[Re: Bigbob_FTW]
#15353815
03/13/25 09:13 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 38
RedHossO3
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 38 |
BTW - wasn’t the KC-10 initially planned to replace the 135? If so, what happened to that plan? Anything to do with the one that blew up on the apron at Barksdale?
|
|
Re: Jared
[Re: RedHossO3]
#15353820
03/13/25 09:20 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,045
Jaredk
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,045 |
BTW - wasn’t the KC-10 initially planned to replace the 135? If so, what happened to that plan? Anything to do with the one that blew up on the apron at Barksdale?
I’m not sure to tell you the truth. I can say that the DC-10/KC-10 was an excellent aircraft though.
|
|
Re: Jared
[Re: Jaredk]
#15353826
03/13/25 09:26 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 104,506
Bigbob_FTW
OP
Big Sprocket Bob
|
OP
Big Sprocket Bob
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 104,506 |
BTW - wasn’t the KC-10 initially planned to replace the 135? If so, what happened to that plan? Anything to do with the one that blew up on the apron at Barksdale?
I’m not sure to tell you the truth. I can say that the DC-10/KC-10 was an excellent aircraft though. Pretty sure operating cost were high. Nice looking plane.
|
|
Re: Jared
[Re: Bigbob_FTW]
#15353833
03/13/25 09:30 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,045
Jaredk
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,045 |
BTW - wasn’t the KC-10 initially planned to replace the 135? If so, what happened to that plan? Anything to do with the one that blew up on the apron at Barksdale?
I’m not sure to tell you the truth. I can say that the DC-10/KC-10 was an excellent aircraft though. Pretty sure operating cost were high. Nice looking plane. Their crews hated life. They were the reliability tankers in Afghanistan. 135s would fly in country with their dedicated receivers, refuel them, dump their extra gas in the 10, then fly morale speed back home to the bar. The poor 10 guys would have to sit there and orbit all night just like us, in case something popped off and someone needed some gas
|
|
Re: Jared
[Re: Bigbob_FTW]
#15353847
03/13/25 09:39 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 104,506
Bigbob_FTW
OP
Big Sprocket Bob
|
OP
Big Sprocket Bob
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 104,506 |
Me and a buddy filled one on a Saturday. 5 trucks ea. and we had to do our own fillstand all because the "couldn't" move it to a pit. Took a whole shift, no lunch.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|