|
Forums59
Topics1,055,676
Posts14,256,538
Members144,568
| |
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
 Re: Micah Parsons
[Re: Wool E. Booger]
#15350883
03/09/25 07:47 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 17,117
Sawhorse
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 17,117 |
If I were Parsons, I would be asking for an astronomical amount so that I’m guaranteed to not be signed, therefore I can go to a team not owned by Jerry, and have chance of winning a playoff game. ^This
|
|
|
Re: Micah Parsons
[Re: wt luke]
#15350888
03/09/25 08:01 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 504
wt luke
OP
Pro Angler
|
|
OP
Pro Angler
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 504 |
Pittsburgh and Cincinnati are also about to feel the pain of the two recent signings which is always a good thing. Get ready to open up your wallets boys. 
|
|
|
Re: Micah Parsons
[Re: Mark Perry]
#15350946
03/09/25 09:35 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,215
Quillback
Extreme Angler
|
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,215 |
Micah's price just skyrocked with the signing of Max Crosby and Myles Garrett. Did Jerry mess up by not resigning him sooner and how much do y'all think he gets now?? Yep. Once again Jerry is going to pay more than he could have had he been quicker to get the deal done. There is a demonstrable pattern here the past couple of years with this in Dallas. It does make me wonder if Jerry does it for the publicity value. It seems there is always something that keeps the Cowboys in the media spotlight. Cowboys now appraised at over $10 billion, not bad for a team that hasn't won a SB for 30 years.
|
|
|
Re: Micah Parsons
[Re: wt luke]
#15350963
03/09/25 10:00 PM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 44,830
WAWI
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 44,830 |
Does anyone think having him or not is really gonna matter? 7 and 10
|
|
|
Re: Micah Parsons
[Re: wt luke]
#15350990
03/09/25 10:45 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 44,867
CCTX
mapquest
|
|
mapquest
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 44,867 |
No……mostly because you are not allowed to hurt the quarterback anymore.
Thirty years ago; he’d be worth a game or two taking out the starting QB.
|
|
|
Re: Micah Parsons
[Re: WAWI]
#15350997
03/09/25 11:01 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 18,584
921 Phoenix
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 18,584 |
Does anyone think having him or not is really gonna matter? 7 and 10 hurts ticket and uniform sales if they don't have him. IT'S ALL ABOUT THE DOLLAR FOR ANY OF THESE TEAMS
|
|
|
Re: Micah Parsons
[Re: CCTX]
#15351036
03/10/25 12:17 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 15,543
Happykamper
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 15,543 |
He’s about 80% of DeMarcus Ware. Reggie White is the only NFL player to accomplish what Parsons has done in his first 4 seasons, White is the greatest to play the position.
|
|
|
Re: Micah Parsons
[Re: wt luke]
#15351038
03/10/25 12:27 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,670
BassFever
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,670 |
They just re-signed Markquese Bell.
|
|
|
Re: Micah Parsons
[Re: wt luke]
#15351056
03/10/25 12:49 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 16,702
Kicker16
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 16,702 |
To bad Dallas has wasted big money on Dak.
Trade Parson's your not going anywhere with Dak.
|
|
|
Re: Micah Parsons
[Re: Kicker16]
#15351068
03/10/25 01:04 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 15,543
Happykamper
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 15,543 |
To bad Dallas has wasted big money on Dak.
Trade Parson's your not going anywhere with Dak. Trade parsons and do what ? Dial 1 800 quarterback ? Are you a mavericks fan ? How that work out so far ? If you trade a superstar you need to get one in return, draft picks are like a box of chocolates, never know what you gonna get
|
|
|
Re: Micah Parsons
[Re: Kicker16]
#15351070
03/10/25 01:09 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,670
BassFever
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,670 |
To bad Dallas has wasted big money on Dak.
Trade Parson's your not going anywhere with Dak. Most NFL teams have over-paid their Qb's.
|
|
|
Re: Micah Parsons
[Re: BassFever]
#15351088
03/10/25 01:33 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 15,543
Happykamper
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 15,543 |
To bad Dallas has wasted big money on Dak.
Trade Parson's your not going anywhere with Dak. Most NFL teams have over-paid their Qb's. They just having to pay what the market is
|
|
|
Re: Micah Parsons
[Re: Happykamper]
#15351196
03/10/25 11:53 AM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 44,830
WAWI
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 44,830 |
To bad Dallas has wasted big money on Dak.
Trade Parson's your not going anywhere with Dak. Most NFL teams have over-paid their Qb's. They just having to pay what the market is Everyone knows the market is screwed up and the concept that every franchise type qb should set a new high is unsustainable. It's just a matter of time before they hit the brakes. Overspending on one or 2 positions is not the way to get where you want to go. I suspect Brock Purdy will be the one who starts the downward move
|
|
|
Re: Micah Parsons
[Re: Happykamper]
#15351199
03/10/25 11:56 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 27,568
patriot07
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 27,568 |
As for Micah, I'd say the folks saying he's 80%-85% of Ware is about right. So he's 85%-ish of a hall of famer? You gotta have a pass rush to compete in this league, and that's going to be worth a fortune to teams that haven't already overpaid mediocre players everywhere. Micah should have been kept if we'd moved forward with a young QB to build around. Keeping Dak means you may as well let him go. Nobody older than 24 has a chance of being on this team when they're super-bowl competitive. I do see some micah jerseys from time to time, which I think is how Jerry decides who to sign. So I expect he'll be grossly overpaid rather than just tagging him or trading him. To bad Dallas has wasted big money on Dak.
Trade Parson's your not going anywhere with Dak. Most NFL teams have over-paid their Qb's. They just having to pay what the market is They did not HAVE to pay Dak anything. If they'd made him play out his existing contract last year and renegotiated this year with a tag on him as many, many folks had suggested, it would have saved them a fortune. They could have signed some free agents last year - Derrick Henry or Saquon for one (either plus Dak's old contract is less than Dak was paid last year). Then his new deal with the injury hanging over him couldn't possibly have been worse than $70M+ against the cap in 2026 and 2027. Or you give up 2025 2nd round and 2024 1st round to move up in 2024 first round to draft one of the elite QBs, tag Dak for one transition year, and you stop paying an average QB 30% of your cap space. Even if Dak had a decent regular season, nobody is under any delusion that he's remotely capable of making a deep playoff run. There's not enough Johnny Walker Blue in Dallas to even make Jerry believe that. All of those are better options. Jerry literally chose the worst option available to him, and everybody knew it except him and a few blue-sunglasses homers.
Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.
- Soren Kierkegaard
|
|
|
Re: Micah Parsons
[Re: patriot07]
#15351239
03/10/25 12:52 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 15,543
Happykamper
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 15,543 |
As for Micah, I'd say the folks saying he's 80%-85% of Ware is about right. So he's 85%-ish of a hall of famer? You gotta have a pass rush to compete in this league, and that's going to be worth a fortune to teams that haven't already overpaid mediocre players everywhere. Micah should have been kept if we'd moved forward with a young QB to build around. Keeping Dak means you may as well let him go. Nobody older than 24 has a chance of being on this team when they're super-bowl competitive. I do see some micah jerseys from time to time, which I think is how Jerry decides who to sign. So I expect he'll be grossly overpaid rather than just tagging him or trading him. To bad Dallas has wasted big money on Dak.
Trade Parson's your not going anywhere with Dak. Most NFL teams have over-paid their Qb's. They just having to pay what the market is They did not HAVE to pay Dak anything. If they'd made him play out his existing contract last year and renegotiated this year with a tag on him as many, many folks had suggested, it would have saved them a fortune. They could have signed some free agents last year - Derrick Henry or Saquon for one (either plus Dak's old contract is less than Dak was paid last year). Then his new deal with the injury hanging over him couldn't possibly have been worse than $70M+ against the cap in 2026 and 2027. Or you give up 2025 2nd round and 2024 1st round to move up in 2024 first round to draft one of the elite QBs, tag Dak for one transition year, and you stop paying an average QB 30% of your cap space. Even if Dak had a decent regular season, nobody is under any delusion that he's remotely capable of making a deep playoff run. There's not enough Johnny Walker Blue in Dallas to even make Jerry believe that. All of those are better options. Jerry literally chose the worst option available to him, and everybody knew it except him and a few blue-sunglasses homers. It's so easy a cave man could do it lol.
![[Linked Image]](https://texasfishingforum.com/forums/pics/userpics/2019/09/full-13-25504-logo.png)
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|
![[Linked Image]](http://media.giphy.com/media/xUA7bcUCntaQseqKMo/200w.gif)
