texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Bestwayrv, MWS76087, edjones, Muser282, BNICK
119568 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 124,218
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 103,693
Bob Davis 94,604
John175☮ 86,122
Pilothawk 83,898
Mark Perry 74,751
Derek 🐝 68,476
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,055,686
Posts14,256,702
Members144,568
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: New vaccine vs autism study [Re: spazm09] #15350862 03/09/25 07:00 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 103,693
Bigbob_FTW Online Content OP
Big Sprocket Bob
OP Online Content
Big Sprocket Bob
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 103,693
Originally Posted by spazm09
Originally Posted by Bigbob_FTW
Originally Posted by spazm09
A good thing can be taken too far; that doesn’t mean it isn’t or wasn’t a good thing.


Thats fair, but here we are. I don't know what happened to my son, but i want to even if it won't change the outcome.


Don’t ever stop your search; you deserve to know if something caused it other than the genetic lottery that we all play.


They can't explain the type 1 diabetes either.


[Linked Image][Linked Image]
Re: New vaccine vs autism study [Re: Bigbob_FTW] #15350887 03/09/25 07:59 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 51,731
RATZ Online Happy
Activity Coordinator
Online Happy
Activity Coordinator
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 51,731
In no way am I saying that Autism is not real, but it seems to me that if a kid is too much of a kid and a little wild and crazy or just the opposite nowadays they want to label them as being on the spectrum. When I was a kid we were just the class clown or if you were the quiet one you were shy.


If God is your co-pilot then change seats

https://abaltcustomlures.com/



[Linked Image][Linked Image][Linked Image]
Re: New vaccine vs autism study [Re: RATZ] #15350896 03/09/25 08:14 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 103,693
Bigbob_FTW Online Content OP
Big Sprocket Bob
OP Online Content
Big Sprocket Bob
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 103,693
Originally Posted by RATZ
In no way am I saying that Autism is not real, but it seems to me that if a kid is too much of a kid and a little wild and crazy or just the opposite nowadays they want to label them as being on the spectrum. When I was a kid we were just the class clown or if you were the quiet one you were shy.


Thats my problem. I dont think aspergers should be on the same scale. Personal opinion.


[Linked Image][Linked Image]
Re: New vaccine vs autism study [Re: Bigbob_FTW] #15350902 03/09/25 08:19 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 18,585
921 Phoenix Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 18,585
I have no idea if shots are causing any of this but even if its a small chance for the kids why not look into it a 1000 times till we find out.

they have been talking about this for a long time, and sure seem like where there is smoke there's fire.

Re: New vaccine vs autism study [Re: Bigbob_FTW] #15350907 03/09/25 08:43 PM
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 15,757
G
grandbassslayer Online Happy
TFF Guru
Online Happy
TFF Guru
G
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 15,757
The vaccines combined with the [censored] in our food that didn’t exist 30 years ago. People should hang for allowing this.
[Linked Image]

Re: New vaccine vs autism study [Re: Bigbob_FTW] #15350924 03/09/25 09:04 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 61,693
L
LoneStarSon Online Content
Private Dancer
Online Content
Private Dancer
L
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 61,693
Originally Posted by Bigbob_FTW
Originally Posted by CCTX
The previously performed thorough studies found no statistically significant link.
Scientists continue to test what is commonly accepted as known….and they should.
The scientific method often finds unexpected, valuable discoveries…..even when testing a hypothesis that has previously been evaluated hundreds of times reaching the same conclusion.



And I'm good with that. Personally I think it's environmental. So many bad things we allow in our food. Too many plastics etc.


There was a pesticide that was used from the 1960's until Trump's first term, despite being banned around 2010, that is known to cause neurologic issues. It was sprayed on all kinds of crops, especially soybeans. I'm leaning more towards it being a food/chemical issue than a vaccine one, but yes, it should be studied.

Re: New vaccine vs autism study [Re: butch sanders] #15350940 03/09/25 09:26 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,329
B
bloo_rainger Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
B
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,329
Originally Posted by butch sanders
Who is funding the study?


The money that’s being wasted on climate change is being reallocated to something worthy.


ALL HAIL TRUMP
Re: New vaccine vs autism study [Re: LoneStarSon] #15350952 03/09/25 09:46 PM
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 15,757
G
grandbassslayer Online Happy
TFF Guru
Online Happy
TFF Guru
G
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 15,757
Originally Posted by LoneStarSon
Originally Posted by Bigbob_FTW
Originally Posted by CCTX
The previously performed thorough studies found no statistically significant link.
Scientists continue to test what is commonly accepted as known….and they should.
The scientific method often finds unexpected, valuable discoveries…..even when testing a hypothesis that has previously been evaluated hundreds of times reaching the same conclusion.



And I'm good with that. Personally I think it's environmental. So many bad things we allow in our food. Too many plastics etc.


There was a pesticide that was used from the 1960's until Trump's first term, despite being banned around 2010, that is known to cause neurologic issues. It was sprayed on all kinds of crops, especially soybeans. I'm leaning more towards it being a food/chemical issue than a vaccine one, but yes, it should be studied.

Well glyphosate is got to be killing us

Re: New vaccine vs autism study [Re: Bigbob_FTW] #15350954 03/09/25 09:53 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 33,670
lanman71 Online Confused
Maroon!
Online Confused
Maroon!
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 33,670
Any study to help figure it out is good. Pesticides, preservatives, all the chemicals we're exposed to, etc... combination of things?


What a maroon!
Re: New vaccine vs autism study [Re: lanman71] #15350961 03/09/25 10:00 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 103,693
Bigbob_FTW Online Content OP
Big Sprocket Bob
OP Online Content
Big Sprocket Bob
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 103,693
Originally Posted by lanman71
Any study to help figure it out is good. Pesticides, preservatives, all the chemicals we're exposed to, etc... combination of things?


Everything should be on the table. thumb


[Linked Image][Linked Image]
Re: New vaccine vs autism study [Re: grandbassslayer] #15351010 03/09/25 11:32 PM
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 4,151
1
1oldbassguy Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
1
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 4,151
Originally Posted by grandbassslayer
Originally Posted by LoneStarSon
Originally Posted by Bigbob_FTW
Originally Posted by CCTX
The previously performed thorough studies found no statistically significant link.
Scientists continue to test what is commonly accepted as known….and they should.
The scientific method often finds unexpected, valuable discoveries…..even when testing a hypothesis that has previously been evaluated hundreds of times reaching the same conclusion.



And I'm good with that. Personally I think it's environmental. So many bad things we allow in our food. Too many plastics etc.


There was a pesticide that was used from the 1960's until Trump's first term, despite being banned around 2010, that is known to cause neurologic issues. It was sprayed on all kinds of crops, especially soybeans. I'm leaning more towards it being a food/chemical issue than a vaccine one, but yes, it should be studied.

Well glyphosate is got to be killing us


glyphosate was introduced around 1994 , gained lots of traction throughout the nineties and early 2000's . It's the base chemical in GMO based seed structure. Europe outlawed it . US lobbyist keep paying off our " leaders " to keep status quo . It destroys your gut biome . Monsanto was suing one farmer per week back then and forced them onto their seeds .
Wanna be healthy -----don't eat anything that is GMO .

Re: New vaccine vs autism study [Re: Bigbob_FTW] #15351017 03/09/25 11:41 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 12,030
S
spazm09 Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
S
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 12,030


[Linked Image] [Linked Image]
Re: New vaccine vs autism study [Re: spazm09] #15351172 03/10/25 10:09 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 701
L
Les Ems Online Content
Pro Angler
Online Content
Pro Angler
L
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 701
Originally Posted by spazm09
[Linked Image]

This must have been put out by big Pharma and the government


Maverick Pro Guide Service
201 Stratos w/225 Etec HO
Re: New vaccine vs autism study [Re: Bigbob_FTW] #15351207 03/10/25 12:05 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 38,261
R
RickS. Online Happy
TFF Guru
Online Happy
TFF Guru
R
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 38,261
I don't know about Autism. But vaccine injury is a real deal.
In less than 10 days after a round of pre-k vaccines. Rue lost all of her motor skills. She layed in a catatonic state for at least a year. The only factor through a process of elimination was the shots she had gotten. My wife started researching. After a few months of detox baths. She came out of the catatonic state. She still can't walk or talk. Nine years later. Tack on seizures, breathing issues, severe chronic stomach issues, the inability to initiate a bowel movement, among a whole laundry list of other problems.
Don't dare bring it up a Children's though. They go into super protective mode to cover their own behinds. Only one neurologist has even come close to admitting there is a link. Off the record of course. Because one can't soil the reputation of the great and corrupt Children's Hospital system.
But off the record he said there are certain genetic markers that if present, can be problematic when it comes to vaccines.
Naturally they aren't going to do genetic testing on every child. It's a very expensive process. Rue has had all.of testing available. While going down her chart. He didn't outright say that she showed those genetic markers. His poker fave was terrible. We could read it on his facial expressions as he went down the chart. This doctor was the head of the neurology department. He's no longer in that position. Disappeared like a fart in a hurricane shortly after that.
Never mind that her childhood was stolen from her and our lives have been turned upside down for almost a decade. Never mind that she probably won't even see her 20th birthday. As long as the reputation of Children's stays in tact and they keep collecting money for ALL the damaged kids out there. Nothing to see here. Just move along.
Call me anti-vax all you want. I wasn't, but I am now. It's real easy to point fingers when you haven't had to deal with the consequences for 10 years. When you haven't 'been mocked by medical professionals at a vastly respected institution like Children's. The medical industry is just as corrupt and filthy as politics. It's all about the money. Our health doesn't matter. The health of our kids and grandkids doesn't matter. Just the bottom line.

Re: New vaccine vs autism study [Re: RickS.] #15351235 03/10/25 12:45 PM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 44,832
W
WAWI Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
W
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 44,832
Originally Posted by RickS.
I don't know about Autism. But vaccine injury is a real deal.
In less than 10 days after a round of pre-k vaccines. Rue lost all of her motor skills. She layed in a catatonic state for at least a year. The only factor through a process of elimination was the shots she had gotten. My wife started researching. After a few months of detox baths. She came out of the catatonic state. She still can't walk or talk. Nine years later. Tack on seizures, breathing issues, severe chronic stomach issues, the inability to initiate a bowel movement, among a whole laundry list of other problems.
Don't dare bring it up a Children's though. They go into super protective mode to cover their own behinds. Only one neurologist has even come close to admitting there is a link. Off the record of course. Because one can't soil the reputation of the great and corrupt Children's Hospital system.
But off the record he said there are certain genetic markers that if present, can be problematic when it comes to vaccines.
Naturally they aren't going to do genetic testing on every child. It's a very expensive process. Rue has had all.of testing available. While going down her chart. He didn't outright say that she showed those genetic markers. His poker fave was terrible. We could read it on his facial expressions as he went down the chart. This doctor was the head of the neurology department. He's no longer in that position. Disappeared like a fart in a hurricane shortly after that.
Never mind that her childhood was stolen from her and our lives have been turned upside down for almost a decade. Never mind that she probably won't even see her 20th birthday. As long as the reputation of Children's stays in tact and they keep collecting money for ALL the damaged kids out there. Nothing to see here. Just move along.
Call me anti-vax all you want. I wasn't, but I am now. It's real easy to point fingers when you haven't had to deal with the consequences for 10 years. When you haven't 'been mocked by medical professionals at a vastly respected institution like Children's. The medical industry is just as corrupt and filthy as politics. It's all about the money. Our health doesn't matter. The health of our kids and grandkids doesn't matter. Just the bottom line.


You will never ever never find a doctor that will go on the record against another doctor short of something ridiculous. And the bar for any type of malpractice requires another doctor to do so. The bar for what's required of a doctor can be very very low. Don't think of them as scientists, mechanics is a more accurate definition. They follow guidelines because they are protected in doing so. Our situation ended in the loss of a child that never should have happened. The wagon circling was instant. A nurse would whisper in your ear that something wasn't done correctly or that wasn't supposed to happen, a doctor will raise an eyebrow or suggest something he would have done different but generally speaking hell will freeze over before a doctor takes a strong position against another doctor. They take care of their own.

Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3