Forums59
Topics1,059,185
Posts14,315,540
Members144,646
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
SRA-Lake Fork
#15264751
12/05/24 06:41 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 27,763
Der Vorsteher
OP
TFF Guru
|
OP
TFF Guru
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 27,763 |
I know this is the bass section but this might affect a lot of you. I heard today something about the SRA banning Tiny Homes on Lake Fork and if you have an existing home you will have to move it. This just a rumor or does this have serious traction?
Team Wolfs
|
|
Re: SRA-Lake Fork
[Re: Der Vorsteher]
#15264761
12/05/24 06:46 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,628
SC-001
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,628 |
Unless your property is included in some sort of existing HOA I don't see how they could legally enforce such a change...
|
|
Re: SRA-Lake Fork
[Re: SC-001]
#15264786
12/05/24 06:59 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 74,891
Mark Perry
Super Freak
|
Super Freak
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 74,891 |
Unless your property is included in some sort of existing HOA I don't see how they could legally enforce such a change... Because of lease back. You don't wn shoreline at Fork. SRA owns the shoreline on Fork from waters edge to so many feet back. Same on Toledo Bend.
|
|
Re: SRA-Lake Fork
[Re: Der Vorsteher]
#15264795
12/05/24 07:07 PM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 17,893
Chris B
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 17,893 |
It's only on SRA leaseback property. There has always been a rule about no permanent structures on leaseback property.
|
|
Re: SRA-Lake Fork
[Re: Der Vorsteher]
#15264801
12/05/24 07:09 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,628
SC-001
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,628 |
Guess that gray area in now black and white.
|
|
Re: SRA-Lake Fork
[Re: SC-001]
#15264827
12/05/24 07:34 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 74,891
Mark Perry
Super Freak
|
Super Freak
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 74,891 |
Guess that gray area in now black and white. There has never been grey area. SRA has always owned the leaseback. 10 years ago or so I wanted to take the wheels off my 5th wheel to store them since we never pulled the RV. We had waterfront at Fork and had very nice underpinning for the RV that was OEM and matched. SRA would not allow it. If wheels are removed it is considered a permanent structure.
|
|
Re: SRA-Lake Fork
[Re: SC-001]
#15264841
12/05/24 07:43 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 8,015
Caymas Cx 21
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 8,015 |
Guess that gray area in now black and white. Always been black and white.
|
|
Re: SRA-Lake Fork
[Re: Mark Perry]
#15264860
12/05/24 08:16 PM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,223
Bryanmc57
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,223 |
Unless your property is included in some sort of existing HOA I don't see how they could legally enforce such a change... Because of lease back. You don't own shoreline at Fork. SRA owns the shoreline on Fork from waters edge to so many feet back. Same on Toledo Bend. From 403' msl to 412' msl or a minimum of 200 feet from 403' msl.
Honora Primum Vel Nullum Omnin Honorem
|
|
Re: SRA-Lake Fork
[Re: Der Vorsteher]
#15264865
12/05/24 08:19 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,628
Evan O'Brien
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,628 |
It’s been the talk of the town around here for the last month or so. The “changes” are just a proposal at the moment. No one was supposed to be living full time in rvs or park models if the unit was on SRA land that they leased to the park owners who in turn lease it to individuals. A lot of people have been ignoring this and living in various parks full time. Some park owners ignored it and some parks owners have been strict about it. There are around 40 tv parks in the lake. They might be trying to enforce that. That’s just one part of it as there’s a lot more to the proposal that could affect parks in different ways so I’ll post the link to the proposal so that anyone interested can read through it as there is a lot of hearsay on the matter. https://www.sratx.org/wp-content/uploads/LFRules.pdfThe proposed changes are in red. I believe they want these units that are on leaseback to be movable on short notice in the event of a “1,000 year flood.” That’s harder to do with the park models as people take the tongue assembly off and some I’ve seen remove the wheels. Again, there is a lot more to it and only time will tell what they decide to do. It’s definitely gotten things stirred up for those who lease spots on Fork.
REALTOR. Residential/Lake/Farm&Ranch/Hunting Properties Evan O'Brien - Regal Realtors - texaslakesandland@gmail.com (214)642-6921
|
|
Re: SRA-Lake Fork
[Re: Evan O'Brien]
#15264923
12/05/24 09:30 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,192
Txduckhunter
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,192 |
. It’s definitely gotten things stirred up for those who lease spots on Fork. Understatement of the century.......
|
|
Re: SRA-Lake Fork
[Re: Txduckhunter]
#15264931
12/05/24 09:40 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 8,015
Caymas Cx 21
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 8,015 |
. It’s definitely gotten things stirred up for those who lease spots on Fork. Understatement of the century....... Yes sir and glad I own.
|
|
Re: SRA-Lake Fork
[Re: Evan O'Brien]
#15264938
12/05/24 09:50 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,628
SC-001
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,628 |
It’s been the talk of the town around here for the last month or so. The “changes” are just a proposal at the moment. No one was supposed to be living full time in rvs or park models if the unit was on SRA land that they leased to the park owners who in turn lease it to individuals. A lot of people have been ignoring this and living in various parks full time. Some park owners ignored it and some parks owners have been strict about it. There are around 40 tv parks in the lake. They might be trying to enforce that. That’s just one part of it as there’s a lot more to the proposal that could affect parks in different ways so I’ll post the link to the proposal so that anyone interested can read through it as there is a lot of hearsay on the matter. https://www.sratx.org/wp-content/uploads/LFRules.pdfThe proposed changes are in red. I believe they want these units that are on leaseback to be movable on short notice in the event of a “1,000 year flood.” That’s harder to do with the park models as people take the tongue assembly off and some I’ve seen remove the wheels. Again, there is a lot more to it and only time will tell what they decide to do. It’s definitely gotten things stirred up for those who lease spots on Fork. Hmmm thats lots of red, guess you have until December 31 2030 to move your tiny home off their land.
|
|
Re: SRA-Lake Fork
[Re: Der Vorsteher]
#15269695
12/11/24 07:56 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,871
bloo_rainger
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,871 |
Who’s going to Center, Texas Thursday morning for the meeting with the SRA?
Hopefully lots of Toledo Bend people….
ALL HAIL TRUMP
|
|
Re: SRA-Lake Fork
[Re: bloo_rainger]
#15269742
12/11/24 12:17 PM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,223
Bryanmc57
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,223 |
Who’s going to Center, Texas Thursday morning for the meeting with the SRA?
Hopefully lots of Toledo Bend people….
Discussing the leaseback changes isn't on the agenda until the next scheduled meeting (I think it's in April). Folks driving down there to hopefully make a 3 minute comment at the end of the meeting (after they've all sent letters) are pretty much just wasting their time IMO... The facebook group comments are fun to read... Lots of folks squawking that SRA scheduled the meeting at 9:15 A.M. and in Center so it would be a burden for them to attend not bothering to check that the SRA board meetings are always in Center and always at 9:15 AM..
Honora Primum Vel Nullum Omnin Honorem
|
|
Re: SRA-Lake Fork
[Re: Der Vorsteher]
#15270150
12/11/24 07:05 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,433
fouzman
Methuselah
|
Methuselah
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,433 |
How does SRA stand to benefit from this proposal? There has to be some financial motive driving this. And why now? I’m all for SRA cracking down on unscrupulous park owners. Aside from that I don’t really understand their reasoning.
Coincidence is His way of remaining anonymous.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|