texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
sandeez, Bward, Richard Cantrell, Liteweight, RealBigfoot
119610 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 124,682
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 104,463
Bob Davis 96,271
John175☮ 86,137
Pilothawk 83,923
Mark Perry 74,867
Derek 🐝 68,499
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,057,566
Posts14,286,655
Members144,610
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: FFS yes or no? [Re: grandbassslayer] #15028757 03/27/24 01:29 PM
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 9
T
T-Rigger Offline
Green Horn
Offline
Green Horn
T
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 9
Originally Posted by grandbassslayer
Originally Posted by SAKS
I am not going to get it. Don’t want to invest that much on something I won’t get to use very often.
As far as the pros I say go for it. These guys are spending between 30k and 50k for electronics. Zaldain interviewed the BASS guys on one of the stops on his YouTube channel. It’s obviously necessary to compete or they would not spend that kind of money on it.
They have 2 types of FFS based on the interviews I watched. They were referring to it as salt water and fresh water.
One has a longer range I think. They all had both.
I rarely agree with Mr Randy but some points are valid on this tech. One thing I would agree with him and Hank Parker on is the HS competition. That should be a level playing field as far as I am concerned.
If you like it, great. If you don’t, great. With the exception above I don’t care.

Nothing is level in HS competition. You’ve got a kid throwing a bass pro crankbait on a ugly stick with mono and another team with g loomis rod’s throwing 20 dollar baits, different mapping, etc.

Can't tell you how many LMB I've seen caught with an Ugly Stik using mono especially with a crankbait. Believe Rick Clunn would rather use it for crankbait fishing too. Matt Robertson likes it, too.

Once on the Stik it's not likely the Bass will get off that easily ...

Good Fishing

Last edited by T-Rigger; 03/27/24 01:30 PM.

Releasing a great fish is the greatest thrill I get from fishing.

Ted Williams
Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: FFS yes or no? [Re: Farrside] #15028794 03/27/24 01:51 PM
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 467
S
Strugglebus Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
S
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 467
That part is true about golf, tennis, etc. I coach Football and Basketball, so I didnt really consider those when I said HS sports. Kind of like Band and Cheerleading. hahahaha You made some good points..

Re: FFS yes or no? [Re: GreaseMonkey] #15028816 03/27/24 02:15 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,118
S
sprigsss Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
S
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,118
Originally Posted by GreaseMonkey
I have the least favorable brand of FFS, Humminbird. I may not see every fish or be able to see my lure retrieve while watching the fish move in for the bite every time, but, the one thing I believe makes it worth the cost is being able to identify dead water and move on without wasting time. Being able to see that areas are holding schools of bait fish and seeing bigger fish in an area helps a lot also. I have found bass in random spots that I would have never even made a cast otherwise.Saying all that, you don't necessarily have to be good at targeting big individual bass with FFS to get a benefit from it. I am very new at using FFS and I'm over 50, so it is quite the learning curve for me, I would definitely recommend FFS to anyone who bass fishes.


If you haven't updated your software to the latest 1.300 version, do so. I was just about ready to invest in a Garmin graph for my bow. I installed the update and now the Mega Live isn't that far behind Garmin, and IMO is on par with Active Target.

Last edited by sprigsss; 03/27/24 02:16 PM.
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3