texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Bob81, juan2025, Mjlucky, Azskeeter, Mjhover
119646 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 125,119
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 105,296
Bob Davis 97,443
John175☮ 86,144
Pilothawk 83,939
Mark Perry 74,880
Derek 🐝 68,515
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,059,111
Posts14,314,023
Members144,646
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 4 of 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 11 12
Re: Lake Farfield-SAVED [Re: Verkeith] #14699416 04/24/23 05:36 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 17,890
Chris B Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 17,890
The developer still hasn’t closed on the property so they are buying it from a public utility company. Not exactly stealing in my book.


[Linked Image]
Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: Lake Farfield-SAVED [Re: Chris B] #14699420 04/24/23 05:38 PM
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 27,671
SteezMacQueen Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 27,671
Originally Posted by Chris B
The developer still hasn’t closed on the property so they are buying it from a public utility company. Not exactly stealing in my book.

It’s not “stolen”, nor is it “saved”. It’s still closing to the public. Just moved back a month or so.


Ranger Z520 guy.
Re: Lake Farfield-SAVED [Re: Verkeith] #14699421 04/24/23 05:38 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,870
D
Douglas J Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
D
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,870
So is the white NB crew in favor or opposed to keeping Fairfield state park public?


[Linked Image]

#MFGA

Re: Lake Farfield-SAVED [Re: 4Weight] #14699468 04/24/23 06:04 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,191
T
Txduckhunter Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
T
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,191
Originally Posted by 4Weight
Originally Posted by Jake Shannon(Skeet4Life)
So the government that always picks special interest groups, lobbyist and large corporations over the average working man is going to possibly do something positive that would make your life better.......... But you don't want it because its "stealing" the government is the king daddy of all the thieves out there you should be happy they even considered "stealing" something for you rather than "stealing" from you.

I guess if they decided to take away a billionaires bass boat and give it to you, you would turn it down...… some of yall are so full of shhit you cant hear yourselves talk.


Couldn't have said it better myself.



Stealing is stealing.
Just because it fits the narrative for you (this time) doesn't make it right.
I'm glad they may "save" Fairfield but they crapped the bed when they didn't move on it quickly and, in my opinion, would not have moved on it if there hadn't been such a public outcry.

Re: Lake Farfield-SAVED [Re: Douglas J] #14699478 04/24/23 06:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 9,222
S
Scoundrel Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
S
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 9,222
Originally Posted by Douglas J
So is the white NB crew in favor or opposed to keeping Fairfield state park public?

Final agreement has been reached that only the NB crew are “grandfathered” into unfettered access to the lake indefinitely (including the outflow basin). yes

Re: Lake Farfield-SAVED [Re: Verkeith] #14699482 04/24/23 06:14 PM
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 9,671
A
avid_basser Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
A
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 9,671
Well, I guess I need to go when it opens again. Seems all these fits from others has raised my interest in heading that way.

Re: Lake Farfield-SAVED [Re: Chris B] #14699485 04/24/23 06:19 PM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,239
B
bassdude10 Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
B
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,239
Originally Posted by Chris B
The developer still hasn’t closed on the property so they are buying it from a public utility company. Not exactly stealing in my book.

Where did you see the state is buying it? The house bill referenced just says the state is going to deny permit requests that would restrict public access. It looks like they are just going to kill the value of the property with regulatory BS and not even purchase it.

Re: Lake Farfield-SAVED [Re: bassdude10] #14699505 04/24/23 06:32 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,334
R
Razorback Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
R
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,334
Originally Posted by bassdude10
Originally Posted by Chris B
The developer still hasn’t closed on the property so they are buying it from a public utility company. Not exactly stealing in my book.

Where did you see the state is buying it? The house bill referenced just says the state is going to deny permit requests that would restrict public access. It looks like they are just going to kill the value of the property with regulatory BS and not even purchase it.


Lovie and Thurston Howell are appalled when bass fishing commoners destroy the ambience at their exclusive estate. Going out on the water trying to catch fish in plain view...how coarse.

Last edited by Razorback; 04/24/23 06:39 PM.
Re: Lake Farfield-SAVED [Re: SteezMacQueen] #14700020 04/25/23 02:50 AM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,503
Jake Shannon(Skeet4Life) Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,503
Originally Posted by SteezMacQueen
[quote=Chris B]The developer still hasn’t closed on the property so they are buying it from a public utility company. Not exactly stealing in my book.

It’s not “stolen”, nor is it “saved”. It’s still closing to the public. Just moved back a month or so.

So what’s the point of the legislation then if it passing does not keep the park open? I have been very confused on how the bill that was actually pushed through keeps the park open.

Re: Lake Farfield-SAVED [Re: Razorback] #14700024 04/25/23 02:56 AM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,870
D
Douglas J Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
D
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,870
Originally Posted by Razorback
Originally Posted by bassdude10
Originally Posted by Chris B
The developer still hasn’t closed on the property so they are buying it from a public utility company. Not exactly stealing in my book.

Where did you see the state is buying it? The house bill referenced just says the state is going to deny permit requests that would restrict public access. It looks like they are just going to kill the value of the property with regulatory BS and not even purchase it.


Lovie and Thurston Howell are appalled when bass fishing commoners destroy the ambience at their exclusive estate. Going out on the water trying to catch fish in plain view...how coarse.




[Linked Image]

#MFGA

Re: Lake Farfield-SAVED [Re: bassdude10] #14700028 04/25/23 03:05 AM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,503
Jake Shannon(Skeet4Life) Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,503
Originally Posted by bassdude10
Originally Posted by Jake Shannon(Skeet4Life)
So the government that always picks special interest groups, lobbyist and large corporations over the average working man is going to possibly do something positive that would make your life better.......... But you don't want it because its "stealing" the government is the king daddy of all the thieves out there you should be happy they even considered "stealing" something for you rather than "stealing" from you.

I guess if they decided to take away a billionaires bass boat and give it to you, you would turn it down...… some of yall are so full of shhit you cant hear yourselves talk.

One of the dumbest comments I’ve ever read on here. This shows who you really are. I absolutely would not take a stolen boat because I’m not a worthless piece of [censored].


Good to hear that you’re not a pice of [censored] you’re just an idiot. It’s amazing how some of y’all see this as black and white, nothing is black and white these days.

The government stole your tax dollars for your entire life without your consent then they put some of that money into an investment for the TAX payers and now it’s being taken away from you…… but you wanna talk about how the state forcing the owners to sell the land to them is “stealing”.

Was it stupid for the government to do that with your money? Investing it into something they never owned. Yes of course it was stupid. The government is filled to the brim with stupid people doing stupid stuff. But instead of correcting this issue you would rather them let it get sold and turned into something that most of us will be never be able to use again. Why would you want that? You want the tax payers to be punished because of the governments stupidity? For what purpose? Just so you can feel good that the government didn’t “steal” the big guys investment property…..

Re: Lake Farfield-SAVED [Re: Jake Shannon(Skeet4Life)] #14700174 04/25/23 12:44 PM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,239
B
bassdude10 Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
B
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,239
Originally Posted by Jake Shannon(Skeet4Life)
Originally Posted by bassdude10
Originally Posted by Jake Shannon(Skeet4Life)
So the government that always picks special interest groups, lobbyist and large corporations over the average working man is going to possibly do something positive that would make your life better.......... But you don't want it because its "stealing" the government is the king daddy of all the thieves out there you should be happy they even considered "stealing" something for you rather than "stealing" from you.

I guess if they decided to take away a billionaires bass boat and give it to you, you would turn it down...… some of yall are so full of shhit you cant hear yourselves talk.

One of the dumbest comments I’ve ever read on here. This shows who you really are. I absolutely would not take a stolen boat because I’m not a worthless piece of [censored].


Good to hear that you’re not a pice of [censored] you’re just an idiot. It’s amazing how some of y’all see this as black and white, nothing is black and white these days.

The government stole your tax dollars for your entire life without your consent then they put some of that money into an investment for the TAX payers and now it’s being taken away from you…… but you wanna talk about how the state forcing the owners to sell the land to them is “stealing”.

Was it stupid for the government to do that with your money? Investing it into something they never owned. Yes of course it was stupid. The government is filled to the brim with stupid people doing stupid stuff. But instead of correcting this issue you would rather them let it get sold and turned into something that most of us will be never be able to use again. Why would you want that? You want the tax payers to be punished because of the governments stupidity? For what purpose? Just so you can feel good that the government didn’t “steal” the big guys investment property…..

It is black and white. The bill introduced is a direct attack on private property rights. It’s pathetic that it would pass and have support in a conservative state. Private property rights are fundamental rights, without them we have nothing. This should scare the [censored] out of y’all, instead you have a bunch of hillbilly [censored] fishermen cheering for massive government overreach so they can keep fishing a lake that they have no rights to.

Re: Lake Farfield-SAVED [Re: Verkeith] #14700255 04/25/23 01:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,334
R
Razorback Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
R
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,334
How many people are going to lose their land and homes if the state passes legislation that allows the park to remain open? Are there generations who grew up cultivating the land, tending to pets and livestock, raising children, and living in family homesteads all around Lake Fairfield, folks who will now be uprooted because the state is taking their property from them?

No, all of these homes and all this property are concepts right now, geographic shapes on a topo map. Break into singing Rain On The Scarecrow if it makes you feel better, but no one is having his home stolen by the state. The people who might have eventually lived there don't even know they may have lived there yet.

Re: Lake Farfield-SAVED [Re: Verkeith] #14700279 04/25/23 01:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 41,111
Allison1 Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 41,111
LOL.

All these scenarios that totally ignore what is happening.
Some don't give a care so long as the lake stays open. I understand them.
The people who are reaching to explain how its ok for the state to enter the scene after the deal was done, your hypocrisy has no bounds.

The power plant stopped business 5 years ago. The plant was taken down and the property put up for sale.
It took several years for an offer to be accepted and another 6 months before the state became interested.
We know the way the state is doing this deal. The legislated that the lake cannot be used unless they keep the lake open as it has been for decades. The sellers and prospective buyers either have to sue the state, drop out of the sale or take it and do something else with the property.

Low down no good dirty dealing state legislature IMO.

Re: Lake Farfield-SAVED [Re: Razorback] #14700290 04/25/23 02:02 PM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,239
B
bassdude10 Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
B
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,239
Originally Posted by Razorback
How many people are going to lose their land and homes if the state passes legislation that allows the park to remain open? Are there generations who grew up cultivating the land, tending to pets and livestock, raising children, and living in family homesteads all around Lake Fairfield, folks who will now be uprooted because the state is taking their property from them?

No, all of these homes and all this property are concepts right now, geographic shapes on a topo map. Break into singing Rain On The Scarecrow if it makes you feel better, but no one is having his home stolen by the state. The people who might have eventually lived there don't even know they may have lived there yet.

So you are saying that the rule of law and property rights shouldn’t apply to everyone equally? We should pick and choose and if it’s an evil rich person or corporation who is getting screwed then it’s okay? You don’t see a slippery slope with that sort of precedent?

We are a constitutional republic because our founding fathers didn’t want democracy. In a constitutional republic rights are protected, in a democracy a mob can vote to steal from others. Congrats on being part of the mob!

Page 4 of 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 11 12
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3