Geez, I'd think if they overturned the bump stock ban, then overturning the pistol brace ruling should be easy

What I think is there is no need for a civilian automatic weapon.
I carried an M16 in Vietnam and fired mostly on semi, more fire control.

Oh, well by all means, since that’s your belief, then let’s just ban them and make others have your same belief. There is no need for a car to travel 100mph, so let’s just go ahead and ban that too.

You don't have to live under a rock to miss the latest bump stock news.

Wait so I wasn’t supposed to turn mine in?

A close friend of mine has a twin pair of full auto MP5's. Both have PEQ 15's on them as well. That pair set him back a cool $100,000. Absolutely ridiculous that you can get a new SBR, SBS or suppressor, but new machine guns are a no no. If registering a new SBR all of the sudden makes it safe for civilians to own, I don't see why new full auto guns manufactured after May 19, 1986 are not safe to own for civilians.

This is quite possibly the dumbest thing ever posted on this forum, and there have been a lot of very dumb things posted on here.

Absolutely

Another idiotic statement

Yours is the idiotic statement!
Mine is fact.

What is fact is you love the federal government infringing on your rights as a citizen of this nation. Your train of thought will do nothing but slowly push us into the same chaos you saw in Vietnam and what’s been seen in Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea et al.

I think that pesky list is called the "Bill of RIGHTS", not the "bill of needs"

You should probably show a little respect to your superiors
You have a long way to go

It's hard for me to respect those who do not respect the Constitution of the United States.

The Constitution was not written for automatic rifles