|
Forums59
Topics1,058,590
Posts14,305,126
Members144,631
| |
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
 Size vs. Pixels
#14323593
03/23/22 01:59 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 143
Shady15
OP
Outdoorsman
|
|
OP
Outdoorsman
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 143 |
I’m sure this has been discussed, but would you rather have a 126sv (12” with 1280 x 800 pixels) or a 8610xsv (10” with 1920 x 1080 pixels) for live scope? I think it’s a size vs. clarity question, but I don’t have a means of comparing side by side so I thought I’d ask. Thank you.
|
|
|
Re: Size vs. Pixels
[Re: Shady15]
#14323867
03/23/22 01:29 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 541
ThaDudeAbides
Pro Angler
|
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 541 |
Give me the 126 for sure. pixels don't matter as much as you might think.
**Professional amateur crappie fisherman**
1997 Nitro Savage 896, 200 HP Mercury EFI, Garmin Force, Garmin GPSMAP 1022 w/ Livescope, Garmin Ultra 122sv, Garmin 93
|
|
|
Re: Size vs. Pixels
[Re: Shady15]
#14323887
03/23/22 01:41 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 215
cr2018
Outdoorsman
|
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 215 |
Each unit is different, the 1223 stands out to me as a unit that is the best bang for your buck. It has a great processor and great resolution, but is set aside from the 126sv because it has a glass screen instead of a plastic screen like the 126sv. We have all of these units available here at Jones Trolling Motor. Feel free to call me anytime for more information.
|
|
|
Re: Size vs. Pixels
[Re: Shady15]
#14324274
03/23/22 07:12 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 143
Shady15
OP
Outdoorsman
|
|
OP
Outdoorsman
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 143 |
Interesting comments. Thanks a lot guys!
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|
