texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Tenaska Frontier, MJB, Herb Schanke, Buzzbait91, MikeZachary
119429 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 122,514
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 100,891
Bob Davis 90,140
John175☮ 86,097
Pilothawk 83,679
Mark Perry 73,590
Derek 🐝 68,436
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,049,790
Posts14,146,859
Members144,429
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 8 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Re: LOOKING AT FISH [Re: buda13] #14289724 02/19/22 04:00 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,502
rj74955 Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,502
Originally Posted by buda13
Basically, everyone that has forward facing sonar, can afford forward facing sonar, and understand what they’re looking at is going to be on one side of the argument. Everyone who does not have it, cannot afford it, or cannot decipher the images is going to be on the other side.

Also if your from the Ivie area livescope, a rigs, and Oklahoma are the devil. Does that pretty much sun it up?

roflmao Nailed it.

Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: LOOKING AT FISH [Re: buda13] #14289745 02/19/22 04:34 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,059
B
Bryanmc57 Online Content
Extreme Angler
Online Content
Extreme Angler
B
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,059
Originally Posted by buda13
Basically, everyone that has forward facing sonar, can afford forward facing sonar, and understand what they’re looking at is going to be on one side of the argument. Everyone who does not have it, cannot afford it, or cannot decipher the images is going to be on the other side.


I disagree. I don't have it and I don't think it's sight fishing.


Honora Primum Vel Nullum Omnin Honorem
Re: LOOKING AT FISH [Re: sprigsss] #14289804 02/19/22 06:15 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 483
B
beeflover Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
B
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 483
Originally Posted by sprigsss
I personally believe snagging a fish with Live Sonar would be more impressive than catching a fish with Live Sonar.

I believe intent is the deciding factor.


I believe snagging is the deciding factor. Is it all right to unintentionally snag a fish? Come on, It's still a snagged fish, throw it back!

Re: LOOKING AT FISH [Re: HDVS] #14290269 02/20/22 01:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 14,728
F
Fishspanker Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
F
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 14,728
It’s can be sight fishing. I watched Patrick Walters his first day on Fork the year he won. Multiple cast on the side of a tree where he could see them. Few trees had them. He rarely caught one that didn’t follow the bait 20 feet before he caught it. Then it might follow several times. A bunch of work to fish all day like that with out a break. He could not have caught those fish without it. He had that technique mastered.

Last edited by Fishspanker; 02/20/22 01:44 PM.

The Sheep who only fears the Wolf is eaten by the Shepherd.
Re: LOOKING AT FISH [Re: Bryanmc57] #14290296 02/20/22 02:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 73,590
Mark Perry Online Content
Super Freak
Online Content
Super Freak
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 73,590
Originally Posted by Bryanmc57
Originally Posted by buda13
Basically, everyone that has forward facing sonar, can afford forward facing sonar, and understand what they’re looking at is going to be on one side of the argument. Everyone who does not have it, cannot afford it, or cannot decipher the images is going to be on the other side.


I disagree. I don't have it and I don't think it's sight fishing.



Same here. Don't have it, doubt I ever will have it but I don't consider it sight fishing.

Re: LOOKING AT FISH [Re: Mark Perry] #14290581 02/20/22 07:33 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,335
O
ogles824 (aka Lakewaydr50) Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
O
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,335
Originally Posted by Mark Perry
Originally Posted by Bryanmc57
Originally Posted by buda13
Basically, everyone that has forward facing sonar, can afford forward facing sonar, and understand what they’re looking at is going to be on one side of the argument. Everyone who does not have it, cannot afford it, or cannot decipher the images is going to be on the other side.


I disagree. I don't have it and I don't think it's sight fishing.



Same here. Don't have it, doubt I ever will have it but I don't consider it sight fishing.

I haven't got any sort of "Live" system on my bug yet but I'm working toward that end as hard as I can go but watching MLF Bass Pro Series for two weeks in a row something I've learned is just because you can see them don't mean you can make them bite. For any of you that have followed it, how many of you have noticed that the pros using it have made the statement; I'm paraphrasing here, that they could see them following their lure; multiple fish at a time in some cases and yet never get bit. To me that would make this game more frustrating than it already is, but it would be nice to know at least you were presenting your lure to fish and not just stumps, cover, and structure.


2012 ZX200 Skeeter
2012 Yamaha 200 SHO

Isaiah 40:31 "but those who hope in the Lord will renew their strength. They will soar on wings like eagles, they will run and not grow weary, they will walk and not be faint.
Proud student of the Pro Staffer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzwF72B2F2w&t=14s
Re: LOOKING AT FISH [Re: J.H.S.] #14290791 02/20/22 11:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 16,990
E
ezbassin Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
E
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 16,990
Originally Posted by J.H.S.
Originally Posted by Tiltman
Ok I am going to try one more time.

Actual Site Fishing is looking at a fish with your eyes , looking down through the water directly at a fish. Its nothing like looking at a screen of a fish that is 60 feet away. I am sorry if I have touched a nerve but they are not the same thing.


I at one time was a very good site fisherman and am a decent at best Livescoper and also have Mega 360 , yes I absolutely agree I see that there are fish and that they are following the bait but that image is nothing like "real" site fishing.

No matter how bad you want it to be it isn't.


That makes no sense. Looking at a fish live on the screen is the exact same as looking at a fish live in the water. You see real-time movements and reactions. Nobody is saying sight fishing is wrong, but to say livescope is not sight fishing is just plain asinine. Sight fishing a bed fish, you're casting to a fish real-time trying to get it to react. Fishing with a livescope, you are casting at a fish you see real-time and are trying to get it to react. The means by which you see it aren't relevant in this case. If you want to argue that it's not bed fishing, then I totally agree. But sight fishing is sight fishing, no matter how bad you don't want it to be.



+1

Re: LOOKING AT FISH [Re: ezbassin] #14292032 02/22/22 03:30 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 52
4
4D Ranch Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
4
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 52
100% agree and I have one on order but I bet I will only use it in the cold months or maybe dog days of summer? Hell I had fish on my 2/D and DI this weekend I couldn’t get to bite! I set a new fishing goal starting now. Any TFF thread that already has 3+ pages I will not click on!! Lol

Page 8 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3