Forums59
Topics1,057,169
Posts14,280,681
Members144,604
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: Tyler822]
#13911885
03/05/21 02:55 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,017
davidsears
OP
Extreme Angler
|
OP
Extreme Angler
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,017 |
Thanks to everyone who shared info on this thread. Your insights will help me in my decision. Thanks again.
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: avid_basser]
#13911937
03/05/21 03:31 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,462
SNAKEBIT
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,462 |
Old school thinking...These new turbo motors are damn nice motors. Now I do miss the sound of a beefy V8 as long as you don't plan on keeping them for years!! replacing twin turbos, the extra high RPMS needed to run them turbos!! got friends with them that like them, got friends with them that wish they had stayed with v8! i still get 12 mpg pulling the boat at 80mph with a Hemi with 165000 miles on it, and won't have to replace turbos etc! in fact, a water pump is all that's ever been done to it! just my 2 cents, and everybody has their opinion.
I love the smell of 2 stroke in the morning !!!
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: David Burton]
#13912139
03/05/21 05:50 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 435
Too Fat 2 Fish
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 435 |
I have the 2.6 ecoboost and tow a 21', no problem. You'll be fine, they are much stronger than you think with these low displacement, high output engines. Same here David, tiny tows just as well as 5.7ltr tundra did
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: SteezMacQueen]
#13912413
03/05/21 09:58 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 700
Blayne Wallace
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 700 |
I had a 2014 F150 with Ecoboost. The supercharger came apart at 80,000 miles causing major damage. I had it fixed under warranty then immediately drove to the Toyota dealer and bought a 5.7L Tundra. The independent mechanic I use showed me page after page of service bulletins related to 2012-2015 ecoboost models. Small displacement engines putting out high HP require parts spinning at very high RPMs. When they fail, it’s bad. I won’t own another one. Hope your maintenance was better than the knowledge of your trucks engine... The ecoboost is forced induction by twin turbos... not a supercharger. The only difference is belt vs exhaust driven. Essentially the same thing. I'm gonna disagree, not the same
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: Blayne Wallace]
#13912432
03/05/21 10:14 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,447
rb7764
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,447 |
I had a 2014 F150 with Ecoboost. The supercharger came apart at 80,000 miles causing major damage. I had it fixed under warranty then immediately drove to the Toyota dealer and bought a 5.7L Tundra. The independent mechanic I use showed me page after page of service bulletins related to 2012-2015 ecoboost models. Small displacement engines putting out high HP require parts spinning at very high RPMs. When they fail, it’s bad. I won’t own another one. Hope your maintenance was better than the knowledge of your trucks engine... The ecoboost is forced induction by twin turbos... not a supercharger. The only difference is belt vs exhaust driven. Essentially the same thing. I'm gonna disagree, not the same Same function to force air or air/fuel into the combustion chamber depending on the type of fuel delivery system. But, the way they do it as it relates to engine performance is quite different.
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: davidsears]
#13912505
03/05/21 11:12 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,064
dk2429
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,064 |
Everyone in their brother pulls their rig with an F150 EB
Majek 22 Extreme/225 Optimax Pro XS hauled by a 2500HD Duramax
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: davidsears]
#13912528
03/05/21 11:37 PM
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 956
JoeFriday
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 956 |
Look up timing chain rattle for that motor. At that mileage and being used, you don’t know the maintenance history unless they have it and it’s credible. The weakness is timing chain stretch in the earlier 3.5’s. Don’t know if it was fixed with the 2015’s. If not, I would be leary at that mileage. I had one and went to a GMC with the 6.2.
This space for rent
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: Tjbev13]
#13912797
03/06/21 03:32 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 286
ETXsabre
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 286 |
Tjbev13 my maintenance was on schedule and as it should have been. Thanks for pointing out that I chose, in your opinion, the incorrect of two basically interchangeable terms in lay conversation. It doesn’t change what I said, which is, the junk came apart and caused major damage. As such, I won’t own another one.
Last edited by ETXsabre; 03/06/21 03:35 AM.
"There never was a horse that couldn't be rode and there never was a cowboy that hadn't been throwed"
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: davidsears]
#13912812
03/06/21 03:58 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 11,008
BigDozer66
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 11,008 |
The 2015 models and newer are the Gen 2 3.5L EcoBoost models. In 2017 the 3.5L EB's got the 10 speed transmission and in 2018 all of the F150's got the 10 speed except for the 3.3L Ti-VCT V6 engine which still had the 6 speed in it. There are several guys that are on the RV Forums that deliver travel trailers with their 3.5L EB's and at least 3 of them have over 250K miles on theirs with no problems. Ours only has right at 50K on it now as it is my wife's daily driver and she has been working from home for 9 months. She get 20-21 back and forth to work and we have gotten 24 on trips and 15-17 pulling the Ranger according to which lake we are going to. If you like small turbo engines then it is a great choice. If you like the sound of the V-8's or you are worried about the Turbo's then buy a not-Turbo engine. 
2016 Ranger RT188 Charcoal Metallic Dual Console 2017 Yamaha 115 VMAX SHO (VF115LA) SS Prop Minn Kota Ultrex i-Pilot Link 45" 80 lb. Humminbird Helix 10 Mega SI BalZout Console Humminbird Helix 10 Mega SI BBT Bow Mount Trick Step
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: davidsears]
#13912875
03/06/21 06:21 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 67
ETXFishin
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 67 |
I only have two buddies who have had that motor and both of them have blown the motor prior to 150k. I’m a die hard Ford guy and would NEVER buy one.
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: davidsears]
#13912917
03/06/21 12:12 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 15,287
Fishspanker
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 15,287 |
3.5 Eco is a beast. Plenty of power. Great mileage without the boat. 21 mpg all around mileage. Pulling a 22 Majek Extreme gets about 11 mpg. Get the big gas tank. Pulling isn’t the issue. Stopping it quickly without trailer brakes is the issue.
So far 145K miles. Only issue was $800 for a new throttle body.
Wish they would put the turbo on the 5.0. That would be super beast.
Last edited by Fishspanker; 03/06/21 12:17 PM.
The Sheep who only fears the Wolf is eaten by the Shepherd.
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: davidsears]
#13913062
03/06/21 02:22 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 98
Bowtech32
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 98 |
You got to worry about the suspension long before power, I towed a 38’ RV with mine. Power was not an issue, suspension was, I trade up to a 250
2021 Skeeter ZXR21 Yamaha SHO 250 93 Ranger 372 150xr6
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: davidsears]
#13913336
03/06/21 07:28 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 91
BeltonBasser
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 91 |
I decided to get a new F-150 in 2018 and went thinking I was definitely going to purchase the V-8. The salesman really thought I should at least test drive a 3.5 EcoBoost just to compare. I am glad I did as the low end torque simply was incredible (and I needed the full 12,700 lbs towing capacity for a large travel trailer). This thing actually accelerates going uphill pulling the RV... While I have had no problems at all (currently have 45K miles), the one thing that always sticks in my mind are the many YouTube videos where a Ford dealer sales person actually walks around their own service department asking ALL the technicians which motor THEY would choose if buying a F-150 today. A few years ago, it was unanimous for the V-8 (the techs just didn't like the complexity and amount of additional plumbing in the engine bay). Their opinion in the last vid I saw a couple months ago hasn't changed by much... the majority of the Ford techs still would choose the V-8 over the EcoBoost.... 201720192020Food for thought...
"The hours a man spends while fishing are not deducted from those of his lifespan."- Unknown Author
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: Fishspanker]
#13913345
03/06/21 07:42 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 67
ETXFishin
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 67 |
That would be so awesome. I have a 5.0 with 250k on it. Only thing I have replaced is the throttle body as well.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|