Forums59
Topics1,055,675
Posts14,256,533
Members144,568
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: davidsears]
#13910950
03/04/21 08:22 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,682
Cmack
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,682 |
Had a 2012 and a 2015 3.5TT. Both towed like a diesel. The 2012 had some intercooler issues which were fixed under a recall. They reflashed the ECU when swapping out the intercooler and it felt like I lost 50 hp. The 2015 was amazing, got 14.5 towing my BassCat and 18-21 non towing. Currently driving a 5.3L GMC which does fine, gets 13.5 towing and averages 18-19 and can squeak 21+ highway if I keep it under 75. I do miss the low end torque of the Ecoboost
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: davidsears]
#13910957
03/04/21 08:28 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,535
McLovin’
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,535 |
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: davidsears]
#13910967
03/04/21 08:35 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,792
RedRaider3933
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,792 |
Owned a 2011 with the 3.5 Ecoboost. Man that thing towed great but I ended up having tons of turbo problems at about 160,000 miles and decided to trade it in. Now I have a 2016 with the 5.0 and it is a complete dog compared to the Ecoboost. Probably going to trade this one in for another Ecoboost.
Go Tech
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: davidsears]
#13911023
03/04/21 09:23 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 345
JDJ01
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 345 |
Tow my 22ft bay boat. With no issue
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: davidsears]
#13911030
03/04/21 09:28 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,836
Bass Buster1
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,836 |
i have a gas 6.3L F250. I drove an eco boost loaner for a week. I prefer my big truck hands down, I was not that impressed with the eco boost
See you on the lake and have a great day!
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: davidsears]
#13911037
03/04/21 09:31 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 700
Blayne Wallace
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 700 |
Had a 2015 F150 with a 5.0L and it pulled my 19ft boat fine. I now have a 2017 F150 Ecoboost with the 10 speed and it is a night and day difference. I probably won't buy another 5.0L F150 to tow after having this truck.
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: davidsears]
#13911083
03/04/21 10:12 PM
|
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 181
Tyler822
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 181 |
I have a 2015 3.5 eco boost and a 2020 5.0 V8. Both motors are great and will do the job just fine. The biggest improvement I've seen has been the transmissions. The 10 speed is a night and day difference from the 6 speed. If you can find a slightly newer model in your price range with the 10 speed you'll be much happier, with whichever motor you go with. I personally will be sticking with the 5.0's moving forward. Lots of folks happy with the eco boost reliability but not me. We've got a dozen or so in our fleet and they really nickel and dime us past 100k miles. I'm talking about 2015-2017 3.5's....
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: Bass Buster1]
#13911086
03/04/21 10:18 PM
|
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 9,157
avid_basser
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 9,157 |
i have a gas 6.3L F250. I drove an eco boost loaner for a week. I prefer my big truck hands down, I was not that impressed with the eco boost The loaner fleet is usually the 2.7L Ecoboost which is not the same as the 3.5L Ecoboost
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: Tyler822]
#13911224
03/05/21 12:32 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 991
Donegonefishin
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 991 |
I have a 2015 3.5 eco boost and a 2020 5.0 V8. Both motors are great and will do the job just fine. The biggest improvement I've seen has been the transmissions. The 10 speed is a night and day difference from the 6 speed. If you can find a slightly newer model in your price range with the 10 speed you'll be much happier, with whichever motor you go with. I personally will be sticking with the 5.0's moving forward. Lots of folks happy with the eco boost reliability but not me. We've got a dozen or so in our fleet and they really nickel and dime us past 100k miles. I'm talking about 2015-2017 3.5's.... +1 on the 10 speed transmission. I have a 3.5 twin turbo Raptor. Towed my 21’8” z521L from Atlanta to Dallas at 80 mph no problems. Make multiple trips to Rayburn.
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: Donegonefishin]
#13911267
03/05/21 01:15 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 14,628
tmd11111
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 14,628 |
I have a 2015 3.5 eco boost and a 2020 5.0 V8. Both motors are great and will do the job just fine. The biggest improvement I've seen has been the transmissions. The 10 speed is a night and day difference from the 6 speed. If you can find a slightly newer model in your price range with the 10 speed you'll be much happier, with whichever motor you go with. I personally will be sticking with the 5.0's moving forward. Lots of folks happy with the eco boost reliability but not me. We've got a dozen or so in our fleet and they really nickel and dime us past 100k miles. I'm talking about 2015-2017 3.5's.... +1 on the 10 speed transmission. I have a 3.5 twin turbo Raptor. Towed my 21’8” z521L from Atlanta to Dallas at 80 mph no problems. Make multiple trips to Rayburn. If you think the 10 speed is impressive in the 1/2 tons you should see it in the Power Stroke.
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: davidsears]
#13911468
03/05/21 03:23 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 286
ETXsabre
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 286 |
I had a 2014 F150 with Ecoboost. The supercharger came apart at 80,000 miles causing major damage. I had it fixed under warranty then immediately drove to the Toyota dealer and bought a 5.7L Tundra. The independent mechanic I use showed me page after page of service bulletins related to 2012-2015 ecoboost models. Small displacement engines putting out high HP require parts spinning at very high RPMs. When they fail, it’s bad. I won’t own another one.
"There never was a horse that couldn't be rode and there never was a cowboy that hadn't been throwed"
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: avid_basser]
#13911487
03/05/21 03:41 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 15,755
grandbassslayer
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 15,755 |
i have a gas 6.3L F250. I drove an eco boost loaner for a week. I prefer my big truck hands down, I was not that impressed with the eco boost The loaner fleet is usually the 2.7L Ecoboost which is not the same as the 3.5L Ecoboost The 2.7 will pull a 21' bass boat easy. In 0-60 tests the 2.7 hangs with the 3.5.
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: ETXsabre]
#13911699
03/05/21 12:53 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 375
Tjbev13
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 375 |
I had a 2014 F150 with Ecoboost. The supercharger came apart at 80,000 miles causing major damage. I had it fixed under warranty then immediately drove to the Toyota dealer and bought a 5.7L Tundra. The independent mechanic I use showed me page after page of service bulletins related to 2012-2015 ecoboost models. Small displacement engines putting out high HP require parts spinning at very high RPMs. When they fail, it’s bad. I won’t own another one. Hope your maintenance was better than the knowledge of your trucks engine... The ecoboost is forced induction by twin turbos... not a supercharger.
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: Tjbev13]
#13911776
03/05/21 01:57 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 27,005
SteezMacQueen
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 27,005 |
I had a 2014 F150 with Ecoboost. The supercharger came apart at 80,000 miles causing major damage. I had it fixed under warranty then immediately drove to the Toyota dealer and bought a 5.7L Tundra. The independent mechanic I use showed me page after page of service bulletins related to 2012-2015 ecoboost models. Small displacement engines putting out high HP require parts spinning at very high RPMs. When they fail, it’s bad. I won’t own another one. Hope your maintenance was better than the knowledge of your trucks engine... The ecoboost is forced induction by twin turbos... not a supercharger. The only difference is belt vs exhaust driven. Essentially the same thing.
Eat. Sleep. Fish.
|
|
Re: Ford 3.5 v6 turbo
[Re: David Burton]
#13911835
03/05/21 02:35 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,756
Matt Jackson
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,756 |
I have the 2.6 ecoboost and tow a 21', no problem. You'll be fine, they are much stronger than you think with these low displacement, high output engines. Me too!
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|