LOL, they were heavily criticized for putting the 3 rd QB in behind by 3 points in the 4 th quarter, and they did not lose Wentz to injury.

Philly tanked in the 4th quarter. There is no other reason for putting that guy in. That was a middle finger to the giants lol

Yet another great Cowboy Season!



Ezekiel Elliott already has a ticket to Cabo.

The Giants have no argument. They were 6-10 and scored three touchdowns in the month of December. Why does anyone think the Eagles hate the Giants anymore than they hate the WFT, who made the playoffs because of last night’s outcome. It was about draft position, not screwing over the Giants.

I think given the opportunity the iggles act badly and they had the opportunity.

Eagles coach lost the game on purpose, and that pass from hurts to a wide open receiver in the end zone was not even close to being on target... pressure or no pressure that’s a pass he makes 99 percent of time unless he was told do not score here. You could look at the offensive lineman on the bench and know exactly what was happening. Especially when the 3rd stringer was out in... hell I think he was even surprised. Coach saying prior to game we play the game to win was complete nonsense. But, they do have picks at spot 6 now instead of 9.

All had at least 3 QBs start a game this year. Cowboys did not lose 3 QBs to injury/COVID. Only 2. Same as many of those teams listed. You can call BS all you want, facts are facts. Several teams started 3 QBs this season. Washington played 4 QBs this year and won the division.

Cowboys have a lot of work ahead of them. The work has to start with Jerry Jones !

3 is not 4, also how many of those games were won ? Just curious since they cannot use it as an excuse.

All had at least 3 QBs start a game this year. Cowboys did not lose 3 QBs to injury/COVID. Only 2. Same as many of those teams listed. You can call BS all you want, facts are facts. Several teams started 3 QBs this season. Washington played 4 QBs this year and won the division.[/quote]
3 is not 4, also how many of those games were won ? Just curious since they cannot use it as an excuse.[/quote]


Washington started 4 and are in the playoffs. You are counting the Cowboys as starting 4 due to injury but that is not true. DiNucci was benched and Gilbdrt started because DiNucci was horrible. Cowboys and the teams listed started at least 3 QBs this year. Cowboys were not alone in the injury department.

3 is not 4, also how many of those games were won ? Just curious since they cannot use it as an excuse.[/quote]


Washington started 4 and are in the playoffs. You are counting the Cowboys as starting 4 due to injury but that is not true. DiNucci was benched and Gilbdrt started because DiNucci was horrible. Cowboys and the teams listed started at least 3 QBs this year. Cowboys were not alone in the injury department.
[/quote]
How many games were won by the non starting QB's , I know Dalton won 4 or 5, not sure about all the others, bet it was not many w's. The Cowboys were devastated by injuries, anyone who would say anything different is just a hater or trying to be argumentative. You cannot lose your franchise QB and 4 starting tackles and a guard and think you are going to be very successful, that does not count all the defensive injuries. Let me ask you this, had the Cowboys remained healthy what do you think their record would have been ? I think they would have run away with the division, at least 4 more wins, if not then this team is in way worse shape than I thought.

Washington started 4 and are in the playoffs. You are counting the Cowboys as starting 4 due to injury but that is not true. DiNucci was benched and Gilbdrt started because DiNucci was horrible. Cowboys and the teams listed started at least 3 QBs this year. Cowboys were not alone in the injury department.
[/quote]
How many games were won by the non starting QB's , I know Dalton won 4 or 5, not sure about all the others, bet it was not many w's. The Cowboys were devastated by injuries, anyone who would say anything different is just a hater or trying to be argumentative. You cannot lose your franchise QB and 4 starting tackles and a guard and think you are going to be very successful, that does not count all the defensive injuries. Let me ask you this, had the Cowboys remained healthy what do you think their record would have been ? I think they would have run away with the division, at least 4 more wins, if not then this team is in way worse shape than I thought.[/quote]

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


I thought they did OK considering their injuries and where the injuries occurred. Sure it costs them games especially to teams with strong defensive front 7's. I think just as big a factor was the defensive scheme and the lack of training camp and pre-season games. If this team had a strong D they'd have won 4-5 more games I think.

What I think Mark is alluding to is he doesn't like the "injury" excuse. I don't either. Insufficient coaching just compounds the injury problem.

Now, it did not finish up like this....but here's the professional perspective of two NFL player/commentators on picking a QB and walking away from Dak.....much like I said, and believed, you can't just ignore rookie talent...

https://www.facebook.com/GetUpESPN/videos/708689266694368/

6th pick, 9th pick, 7th pick, 10th pick there’s not that big of a difference in talent.

The eagles are seriously screwed....so that's good. They are 70 million dollars over the cap with wentz or not...and they're old.