texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Bobby J., JPhillips1973, RTFishal, H1 ranger, T-RigLunkers
119177 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
hopalong 120,963
TexDawg 119,750
Bigbob_FTW 95,280
John175☮ 85,918
Pilothawk 83,274
Bob Davis 82,266
Mark Perry 72,467
Derek 🐝 68,321
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,038,787
Posts13,952,808
Members144,177
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Falcon vs Falcon #13655172 08/03/20 09:11 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,297
G
G Love Offline OP
Extreme Angler
OP Offline
Extreme Angler
G
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,297
If you were to choose between an Expert Hudson Special or a LR Composite Cranker Il, for the intended purposes, what would you go with? I do like a rod that can do more than one thing (Expert Hudson) but the main priority is going to be for 7-10'+ cranks. Just kinda torn. Prob wind up with both at some point but for now, what say you?

Also, I've always been a fan of the Bomber Fat Free's even back when they were Excalibur. But what other crank baits are y'all throwing this time of year?

Preesh

Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: Falcon vs Falcon [Re: G Love] #13655198 08/03/20 09:40 PM
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,342
S
SteezMacQueen Online Happy
TFF Guru
Online Happy
TFF Guru
S
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,342
I have both. I can say that the Cranker II is very good at casting cranks and keeping fish pinned. The other techniques can be covered by a much less specialized rod, but crank baits require a long, flexible, moderate rod.


Eat. Sleep. Fish.
Re: Falcon vs Falcon [Re: G Love] #13655425 08/04/20 01:09 AM
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 557
Medinalakeguy Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 557
10XD on a expert Xd Cranker


Falcon Rods > G.Loomis
2004 Skeeter ZX250
JIMBO WINBO
Re: Falcon vs Falcon [Re: G Love] #13655990 08/04/20 04:11 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,297
G
G Love Offline OP
Extreme Angler
OP Offline
Extreme Angler
G
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,297
Right own. Probably go with the cranker.

Re: Falcon vs Falcon [Re: G Love] #13656021 08/04/20 04:37 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,752
Outdoordude Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,752
I'd go with the Lowrider cranker II. It's a pleasure to use for medium to deep crankbaits and your bigger 2.5-sized squarebills where long casts are needed. It's a bit much for lighter 1.5-sized squarebills and too long, for short me at least, for close-range highly accurate work but it can handle that if needed. It's slightly heavier and less sensitive than the Expert line, but I also don't feel extreme sensitivity is much benefit in most cases for a crankbait rod. No argument that lighter is better, but at 2/3 the price of an Expert, I don't think you're missing much by going with the cheaper Lowrider.


Scott Jones
Re: Falcon vs Falcon [Re: G Love] #13656070 08/04/20 05:12 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,297
G
G Love Offline OP
Extreme Angler
OP Offline
Extreme Angler
G
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,297
Yeah, if it's not a utility rod, I'm just as happy with the Lowrider. Which I own several of, and I like them. Not as well as the Expert, but still a good rod. Thanks.

Re: Falcon vs Falcon [Re: G Love] #13656117 08/04/20 05:35 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,954
Sinkey Online Content
Tidy Scoop
Online Content
Tidy Scoop
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,954
XD Cranker

Re: Falcon vs Falcon [Re: SteezMacQueen] #13657006 08/05/20 03:23 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 900
S
SWH Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
S
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 900
Originally Posted by SteezMacQueen
I have both. I can say that the Cranker II is very good at casting cranks and keeping fish pinned. The other techniques can be covered by a much less specialized rod, but crank baits require a long, flexible, moderate rod.


Do you run the graphite or composite? I felt the graphite didn’t have enough back bone to throw on the top end of the 3/4” rating.

Re: Falcon vs Falcon [Re: G Love] #13657008 08/05/20 03:25 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 900
S
SWH Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
S
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 900
I assume the Hudson special is similar to the deep runner. I’d lean that way. If I’m throwing a 7’6” Rod I’d like a bit higher lure rating than 3/4 oz.

Re: Falcon vs Falcon [Re: SWH] #13657016 08/05/20 03:30 AM
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,342
S
SteezMacQueen Online Happy
TFF Guru
Online Happy
TFF Guru
S
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 23,342
Originally Posted by SWH
Originally Posted by SteezMacQueen
I have both. I can say that the Cranker II is very good at casting cranks and keeping fish pinned. The other techniques can be covered by a much less specialized rod, but crank baits require a long, flexible, moderate rod.


Do you run the graphite or composite? I felt the graphite didn’t have enough back bone to throw on the top end of the 3/4” rating.

I assume it’s graphite. I honestly don’t know for sure. It’s too light to be a composite, so I’d lean towards graphite. It does seem a little underpowered for 10xds, but still chunks them a LONG ways.


Eat. Sleep. Fish.
Re: Falcon vs Falcon [Re: G Love] #13657038 08/05/20 03:48 AM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,297
G
G Love Offline OP
Extreme Angler
OP Offline
Extreme Angler
G
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,297
I saw someone mention and XD Cranker. I bet that’s a beast of a rod. It seems there’s just kind of a gap between the Cranker II and the bigger Cranker, which would leave room for a multi purpose like an Expert HS. The rock piles and ledges I’m lookin at are 13-15’. Was thinking something that would handle a little deeper diving bait, than what I currently have, which are more moderate. But I don’t really want to run a rod that I use for C Rigs either. I’ve never been much of a Cranker but I’m getting more in to it. It’s tough to beat covering water.

Re: Falcon vs Falcon [Re: G Love] #13657137 08/05/20 11:38 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 900
S
SWH Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
S
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 900
Originally Posted by G Love
I saw someone mention and XD Cranker. I bet that’s a beast of a rod. It seems there’s just kind of a gap between the Cranker II and the bigger Cranker, which would leave room for a multi purpose like an Expert HS. The rock piles and ledges I’m lookin at are 13-15’. Was thinking something that would handle a little deeper diving bait, than what I currently have, which are more moderate. But I don’t really want to run a rod that I use for C Rigs either. I’ve never been much of a Cranker but I’m getting more in to it. It’s tough to beat covering water.



Funny you mention that, I’ve been pretty loyal to Falcon and wanted to get more into cranking so I bought the Cranker II and XD in the new lowrider series. Your interpretation is exactly right. The Cranker II is on the light side for your Fat Free Shad/6xd, but the XD Rod is boarder line a swim bait rod. Sure wish Falcon could come up with something rated just between the two Rod actions.

Re: Falcon vs Falcon [Re: G Love] #13657376 08/05/20 02:52 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,297
G
G Love Offline OP
Extreme Angler
OP Offline
Extreme Angler
G
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,297
I think it's more of a square bill type rod. I'll probably get both. I can run a chatter early on that HS and then tie on a 6XD later. The Cranker II is def a specific rod.

Re: Falcon vs Falcon [Re: G Love] #13657491 08/05/20 04:30 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,954
Sinkey Online Content
Tidy Scoop
Online Content
Tidy Scoop
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,954
The XD Cranker is no where near a swimbait rod. Slightly stiff backbone with alot more tip.

Re: Falcon vs Falcon [Re: G Love] #13657716 08/05/20 07:43 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,297
G
G Love Offline OP
Extreme Angler
OP Offline
Extreme Angler
G
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,297
Well I just picked up a Cranker II at the local tackle shop. Idk how I feel about it lol.

Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3