texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
tieyi, Chad Jordan, TCKrugerville, Monkey95, HudBass09
119639 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 125,058
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 105,231
Bob Davis 97,357
John175☮ 86,143
Pilothawk 83,934
Mark Perry 74,876
Derek 🐝 68,513
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,058,915
Posts14,310,856
Members144,639
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Which Do You Prefer? #1325389 05/18/07 05:24 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,792
B
Brandon82 Offline OP
Extreme Angler
OP Offline
Extreme Angler
B
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,792
Do you prefer a Low profile Baitcasting reel or a Round Baitcasting reel? Just thought I would see which one was more popular on here...


Re: Which Do You Prefer? [Re: Brandon82] #1325452 05/18/07 10:26 AM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,565
Brandon972 Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,565

Low profile all the way !! thumb

Re: Which Do You Prefer? [Re: Brandon972] #1325619 05/18/07 01:24 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 20,602
Baylor_Guy� Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 20,602
cranking-round, everything else-LP


[Linked Image] [Linked Image]
Re: Which Do You Prefer? [Re: Baylor_Guy�] #1325734 05/18/07 02:31 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,909
C
coachmas Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
C
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,909
nothing but low-profile reels for me. I can't stand to use those big round Abu reels. My hands aren't big enough to hold onto to them. Coach


Wishin I was Fishin!!!

Re: Which Do You Prefer? [Re: coachmas] #1325746 05/18/07 02:37 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,540
A
aggiegolfer Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
A
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,540
I don't really care. Most of the better performing reels are low profile though, but I use a Calcutta or a 4501 C3 just fine.

Re: Which Do You Prefer? [Re: aggiegolfer] #1325800 05/18/07 03:08 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 50,573
David Lee Offline
Super Freak
Offline
Super Freak
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 50,573
I prefer low profile for most.



Originally Posted By: FattyMcButterpants
Yes I did admit defeat. Good job back to back champion
Re: Which Do You Prefer? [Re: David Lee] #1326069 05/18/07 04:48 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,792
B
Brandon82 Offline OP
Extreme Angler
OP Offline
Extreme Angler
B
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,792
I'm new to Baitcasting and it seems like the LP's would be more comfortable than the round ones. fish

Re: Which Do You Prefer? [Re: Brandon82] #1326297 05/18/07 06:52 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,805
Y
Yellowcat Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
Y
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,805
i use the roound profile.
the only baitcaster i use is the abu 5000 and the abu 6500.
but on the other hand i catfish with them, hybrids or whites with live or dead bait so i am not casting much.


Justin
63lb, 2 58lb, several 40's, 38lb, and several 20lb yellas.


Re: Which Do You Prefer? [Re: Yellowcat] #1326342 05/18/07 07:11 PM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,181
M
mcdil Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
M
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,181
Almost everyone says low profile, but what they fail to realize is that some of the round reels like the Calcutta are actually as low or lower. They just don't look like it because they are round. It's deceiving. That said, round reels like the Calcutta are typically stronger, slightly heavier, BUT more comfortable to hold making them feel smaller and lighter. Most people that say "low profile all the way" have only tried the 5500 to 6500 size Abu reels which are far larger and clunkier in all aspects than say a Calcutta 100TE GT. Grab one of these, throw it on a G-Loomis weightless worm rod and make a few casts. If you don't fall in love immediately, you are far pickier than me. Even then, this reel weighs in at almost 11 oz, but it feels like a 7 oz low profile reel.

That said, most of mine are low profile just because that style is more prolific. Plus, I don't have that kind of dough to continuously drop $330 on a reel like the Calcutta TE-GT. My wife would kill me. If I were single? Sure maybe

Last edited by Bass Hog; 05/18/07 07:13 PM.

Mark
Re: Which Do You Prefer? [Re: mcdil] #1326348 05/18/07 07:13 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,805
Y
Yellowcat Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
Y
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,805
Originally Posted By: Bass Hog
Almost everyone says low profile, but what they fail to realize is that some of the round reels like the Calcutta are actually as low or lower. They just don't look like it because they are round. It's deceiving. That said, round reels like the Calcutta are typically stronger, slightly heavier, BUT more comfortable to hold making them feel smaller and lighter. Most people that say "low profile all the way" have only tried the 5500 to 6500 size Abu reels which are far larger and clunkier in all aspects than say a Calcutta 100TE GT. Grab one of these, throw it on a G-Loomis weightless worm rod and make a few casts. If you don't fall in love immediately, you are far pickier than me. Even then, this reel weighs in at almost 11 oz, but it feels like a 7 oz low profile reel.


well said thumb


Justin
63lb, 2 58lb, several 40's, 38lb, and several 20lb yellas.


Re: Which Do You Prefer? [Re: Yellowcat] #1326469 05/18/07 08:00 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,697
jwcromer Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,697
IM A HONKY TONK MAN......... AND I CANT SEEM TO STOP!
I was too till I got married.........

Re: Which Do You Prefer? [Re: jwcromer] #1326493 05/18/07 08:08 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,805
Y
Yellowcat Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
Y
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,805
Originally Posted By: jwcromer
IM A HONKY TONK MAN......... AND I CANT SEEM TO STOP!
I was too till I got married.........


grin cheers thumb


Justin
63lb, 2 58lb, several 40's, 38lb, and several 20lb yellas.


Re: Which Do You Prefer? [Re: Yellowcat] #1326723 05/18/07 10:16 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,565
Brandon972 Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,565
Quote:
Almost everyone says low profile, but what they fail to realize is that some of the round reels like the Calcutta are actually as low or lower. They just don't look like it because they are round. It's deceiving

You obviously have never picked up a Chronarch 50 MG, (or similar size shimano) or a Revo !! rolfmao

Re: Which Do You Prefer? [Re: Brandon972] #1326814 05/18/07 11:16 PM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,181
M
mcdil Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
M
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,181
I own a Revo. I like it a lot. I consider those the new super low profile reels along with the Pflueger Summit and the BPS reels. The 50 MG is an awesome reel, but it isn't any lower than a Calcutta 100. In fact a Calcutta 50 (which I have, and has the same relative line capacity of the 50 MG) is lower and by a lot. Measure it. I know it doesn't look like it, but it is. Most people don't realize that the rod attachment on the round reels is pushed way up in the reel as close to the spool as possible. All a low profile reel is, is longitudinally longer. That extra length makes it look lower, but it isn't.


Mark
Re: Which Do You Prefer? [Re: mcdil] #1326967 05/19/07 01:38 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 9,699
M
mhood Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
M
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 9,699
I love my low profiles (Pixies, Scorpion, Sol, SMAK, Chronarch) but there is something very special about a Conquest 50. That little round reel is a solid eleven on a ten point grinometer...come to think of it, so is the Calcutta DC100.

Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3