Forums59
Topics1,057,768
Posts14,290,296
Members144,614
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps?
[Re: FXfromTx]
#12565560
01/05/18 08:27 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,272
LittleGazoo
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,272 |
Ken Smith's videos mentioned 20 large trees between Cassels Boykin & bridge. Said it had danger. He had GPS coordinates for one of them. Anyone have & will share any of the others or a safe running track?
|
|
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps?
[Re: FXfromTx]
#12565582
01/05/18 08:53 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559
Jarrett Latta
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559 |
They are floaters so they change location often year to year
|
|
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps?
[Re: FXfromTx]
#12568186
01/08/18 02:21 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 677
manhunter
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 677 |
Ive been fishing Rayburn for 30 years and Im worried about stumps every trip. Get the chip, itll say you headaches.
|
|
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps?
[Re: FXfromTx]
#12568264
01/08/18 03:08 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,502
Flooringit
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,502 |
I asked about. A chip once while at a tourney guy said oh thered no boat lanes here looked at Me like I was crazy. I had a chip in it but could t figure out how to down load it
2013 Phoenix 920xp
|
|
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps?
[Re: FXfromTx]
#12568278
01/08/18 03:15 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,082
dk2429
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,082 |
I've only been on Rayburn a few times, recent one being a few weeks ago.. I've never hit a stump/shallow water anywhere. Last week we fished all over the place, mostly down toward twin dikes. I decided to do some exploring and ran about halfway up the lake to the north and basically just stayed in the middle wheres the 50ft+ of water and never hit anything or saw anything to hit.. Also trailered to Jackson Hill and ran down to the 147 bridge. There were a lot of stumps up on the end, but I just used some common sense and made sure I stayed in deep water away from the visible stump fields. No issues.
I think the closest I got to screwing up was going from Cassle Boykin to 147.. I wasn't paying attention to my chart, and apparently there's a big shallow point that comes off the bank a good ways. I went from like 20ft to 8ft pretty quick but dropped back down. Now one of the first times to Rayburn a buddy and I stayed up at Hanks Creek.. We fished all that area and up to even farther north real well, and never had any issues.. We just used common sense and stayed deep and watched for stumps.
This doesn't mean don't be cautious on where you are going.. I guess I'm just a lucky person, because I've never had issues hitting anything on that lake. Take advice from the guys that fish this lake daily.. This is just my experience
Majek 22 Extreme/225 Optimax Pro XS hauled by a 2500HD Duramax
|
|
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps?
[Re: FXfromTx]
#12568463
01/08/18 12:13 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559
Jarrett Latta
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559 |
Ya alot of those "deep" areas are also covered in stumps. Let the lake fall another foot or two and you won't be running those areas...
|
|
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps?
[Re: FXfromTx]
#12568597
01/08/18 02:38 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 4,740
Flippin-Out
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 4,740 |
He'll find out soon enough if he keeps thinking and running like he has been. There were plenty of trees 50+ feet tall before the lake was inundated, and some of them still are!
Last edited by Flippin-Out; 01/08/18 02:42 PM.
|
|
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps?
[Re: dk2429]
#12568646
01/08/18 03:06 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,070
kellisag
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,070 |
I've only been on Rayburn a few times, recent one being a few weeks ago.. I've never hit a stump/shallow water anywhere. Last week we fished all over the place, mostly down toward twin dikes. I decided to do some exploring and ran about halfway up the lake to the north and basically just stayed in the middle wheres the 50ft+ of water and never hit anything or saw anything to hit.. Also trailered to Jackson Hill and ran down to the 147 bridge. There were a lot of stumps up on the end, but I just used some common sense and made sure I stayed in deep water away from the visible stump fields. No issues.
I think the closest I got to screwing up was going from Cassle Boykin to 147.. I wasn't paying attention to my chart, and apparently there's a big shallow point that comes off the bank a good ways. I went from like 20ft to 8ft pretty quick but dropped back down. Now one of the first times to Rayburn a buddy and I stayed up at Hanks Creek.. We fished all that area and up to even farther north real well, and never had any issues.. We just used common sense and stayed deep and watched for stumps.
This doesn't mean don't be cautious on where you are going.. I guess I'm just a lucky person, because I've never had issues hitting anything on that lake. Take advice from the guys that fish this lake daily.. This is just my experience Maybe you just have a horseshoe up your [censored]. I hope nobody follows your advice! Running up the middle of the lake in the "deep water" is the exact wrong way if you are anywhere north of Caney. Between JH and the 147 there are also some ridges/humps out in the middle that will show up if the lake gets low again like 2011. North of Hanks I guess you can run the river but there are some big ones right in the middle of the "lane" that will eat your lunch as well.
|
|
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps?
[Re: FXfromTx]
#12568718
01/08/18 03:51 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,790
Phoenix_Ed
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,790 |
I was running up towards Veach Friday and just about plowed one south of there, I will pull the location off of my depth finder and post it. Sumbitch is about 18" around and same distance out of the water.
Last edited by 721Phoenix; 01/08/18 03:54 PM.
Wishin I was fishin!! ..............>(((//*> 2021 Phoenix 819 - Mercury 200 4 Stroke - Ultrex Her name is Novia Número Cinco. Humminbird Helix 15 Mega SI - Helix 12 Mega SI - Mega 360 Garmin 1022 w/LVS34 FFS thingy PB Largemouth - 9.51 - Toledo Bend - March 2014
|
|
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps?
[Re: Jarrett Latta]
#12568746
01/08/18 04:06 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 162
RYAN R
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 162 |
Best advice I have from growing up fishing Rayburn the past 25 years is don't run based on navionics....there are zero marked boat lanes. If you are unsure of an area don't run it. This. I try using boat lanes mapped by Navionics but they are worthless!
|
|
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps?
[Re: Phoenix_Ed]
#12569022
01/08/18 06:49 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 227
ToledoBassin
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 227 |
I was running up towards Veach Friday and just about plowed one south of there, I will pull the location off of my depth finder and post it. Sumbitch is about 18" around and same distance out of the water. Sounds like the one that's about 4-5 hundred yards out from the mouth of Coleman.
|
|
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps?
[Re: FXfromTx]
#12569158
01/08/18 08:16 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,268
the skipper
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,268 |
Straight out from Coleman there a a big group of trees with some big ones mixed in. There's a few jugs out there but they don't mark them all.
|
|
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps?
[Re: the skipper]
#12569165
01/08/18 08:19 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 227
ToledoBassin
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 227 |
Straight out from Coleman there a a big group of trees with some big ones mixed in. There's a few jugs out there but they don't mark them all. Yes, as of last week the trees with jugs were still not showing, but one large one was out the water.
|
|
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps?
[Re: FXfromTx]
#12569208
01/08/18 08:46 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559
Jarrett Latta
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559 |
And a group between five fingers and Westwood boat ramp. I don't think they are an issue yet but they are definitely there
|
|
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps?
[Re: kellisag]
#12569522
01/09/18 12:33 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,082
dk2429
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,082 |
I've only been on Rayburn a few times, recent one being a few weeks ago.. I've never hit a stump/shallow water anywhere. Last week we fished all over the place, mostly down toward twin dikes. I decided to do some exploring and ran about halfway up the lake to the north and basically just stayed in the middle wheres the 50ft+ of water and never hit anything or saw anything to hit.. Also trailered to Jackson Hill and ran down to the 147 bridge. There were a lot of stumps up on the end, but I just used some common sense and made sure I stayed in deep water away from the visible stump fields. No issues.
I think the closest I got to screwing up was going from Cassle Boykin to 147.. I wasn't paying attention to my chart, and apparently there's a big shallow point that comes off the bank a good ways. I went from like 20ft to 8ft pretty quick but dropped back down. Now one of the first times to Rayburn a buddy and I stayed up at Hanks Creek.. We fished all that area and up to even farther north real well, and never had any issues.. We just used common sense and stayed deep and watched for stumps.
This doesn't mean don't be cautious on where you are going.. I guess I'm just a lucky person, because I've never had issues hitting anything on that lake. Take advice from the guys that fish this lake daily.. This is just my experience Maybe you just have a horseshoe up your [censored]. I hope nobody follows your advice! Running up the middle of the lake in the "deep water" is the exact wrong way if you are anywhere north of Caney. Between JH and the 147 there are also some ridges/humps out in the middle that will show up if the lake gets low again like 2011. North of Hanks I guess you can run the river but there are some big ones right in the middle of the "lane" that will eat your lunch as well. Ha! That's why I said specifically "Take advice from the guys that fish their a lot." Here's the deal though, I don't exactly know where "Caney" is, so I couldn't tell you if I went that far up or not. I didn't go up too far because I am aware of the forest. Again, just my apparently LUCKY experience with the lake.. Now, Toledo Bend is a different story. I idled the whole time I was there and still managed to knock a few out.
Majek 22 Extreme/225 Optimax Pro XS hauled by a 2500HD Duramax
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|