texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
noah.j.7, Mike Hall, SOFdude, onlyme, sandeez
119614 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 124,721
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 104,555
Bob Davis 96,417
John175☮ 86,137
Pilothawk 83,925
Mark Perry 74,867
Derek 🐝 68,501
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,057,768
Posts14,290,296
Members144,614
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps? [Re: FXfromTx] #12565560 01/05/18 08:27 PM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,272
L
LittleGazoo Online Content
Extreme Angler
Online Content
Extreme Angler
L
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,272
Ken Smith's videos mentioned 20 large trees between Cassels Boykin & bridge. Said it had danger. He had GPS coordinates for one of them. Anyone have & will share any of the others or a safe running track?

Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps? [Re: FXfromTx] #12565582 01/05/18 08:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559
J
Jarrett Latta Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
J
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559
They are floaters so they change location often year to year

Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps? [Re: FXfromTx] #12568186 01/08/18 02:21 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 677
M
manhunter Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
M
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 677
Ive been fishing Rayburn for 30 years and Im worried about stumps every trip. Get the chip, itll say you headaches.

Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps? [Re: FXfromTx] #12568264 01/08/18 03:08 AM
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,502
F
Flooringit Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
F
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,502
I asked about. A chip once while at a tourney guy said oh thered no boat lanes here looked at
Me like I was crazy. I had a chip in it but could t figure out how to down load it


2013 Phoenix 920xp
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps? [Re: FXfromTx] #12568278 01/08/18 03:15 AM
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,082
D
dk2429 Online Content
Extreme Angler
Online Content
Extreme Angler
D
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,082
I've only been on Rayburn a few times, recent one being a few weeks ago.. I've never hit a stump/shallow water anywhere. Last week we fished all over the place, mostly down toward twin dikes. I decided to do some exploring and ran about halfway up the lake to the north and basically just stayed in the middle wheres the 50ft+ of water and never hit anything or saw anything to hit.. Also trailered to Jackson Hill and ran down to the 147 bridge. There were a lot of stumps up on the end, but I just used some common sense and made sure I stayed in deep water away from the visible stump fields. No issues.

I think the closest I got to screwing up was going from Cassle Boykin to 147.. I wasn't paying attention to my chart, and apparently there's a big shallow point that comes off the bank a good ways. I went from like 20ft to 8ft pretty quick but dropped back down. Now one of the first times to Rayburn a buddy and I stayed up at Hanks Creek.. We fished all that area and up to even farther north real well, and never had any issues.. We just used common sense and stayed deep and watched for stumps.

This doesn't mean don't be cautious on where you are going.. I guess I'm just a lucky person, because I've never had issues hitting anything on that lake. Take advice from the guys that fish this lake daily.. This is just my experience


Majek 22 Extreme/225 Optimax Pro XS hauled by a 2500HD Duramax



Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps? [Re: FXfromTx] #12568463 01/08/18 12:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559
J
Jarrett Latta Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
J
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559
Ya alot of those "deep" areas are also covered in stumps. Let the lake fall another foot or two and you won't be running those areas...

Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps? [Re: FXfromTx] #12568597 01/08/18 02:38 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 4,740
F
Flippin-Out Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
F
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 4,740
He'll find out soon enough if he keeps thinking and running like he has been. There were plenty of trees 50+ feet tall before the lake was inundated, and some of them still are!

Last edited by Flippin-Out; 01/08/18 02:42 PM.
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps? [Re: dk2429] #12568646 01/08/18 03:06 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,070
K
kellisag Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
K
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,070
Originally Posted By: dk2429
I've only been on Rayburn a few times, recent one being a few weeks ago.. I've never hit a stump/shallow water anywhere. Last week we fished all over the place, mostly down toward twin dikes. I decided to do some exploring and ran about halfway up the lake to the north and basically just stayed in the middle wheres the 50ft+ of water and never hit anything or saw anything to hit.. Also trailered to Jackson Hill and ran down to the 147 bridge. There were a lot of stumps up on the end, but I just used some common sense and made sure I stayed in deep water away from the visible stump fields. No issues.

I think the closest I got to screwing up was going from Cassle Boykin to 147.. I wasn't paying attention to my chart, and apparently there's a big shallow point that comes off the bank a good ways. I went from like 20ft to 8ft pretty quick but dropped back down. Now one of the first times to Rayburn a buddy and I stayed up at Hanks Creek.. We fished all that area and up to even farther north real well, and never had any issues.. We just used common sense and stayed deep and watched for stumps.

This doesn't mean don't be cautious on where you are going.. I guess I'm just a lucky person, because I've never had issues hitting anything on that lake. Take advice from the guys that fish this lake daily.. This is just my experience


Maybe you just have a horseshoe up your [censored]. I hope nobody follows your advice!

Running up the middle of the lake in the "deep water" is the exact wrong way if you are anywhere north of Caney.

Between JH and the 147 there are also some ridges/humps out in the middle that will show up if the lake gets low again like 2011.

North of Hanks I guess you can run the river but there are some big ones right in the middle of the "lane" that will eat your lunch as well.

Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps? [Re: FXfromTx] #12568718 01/08/18 03:51 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,790
Phoenix_Ed Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,790
I was running up towards Veach Friday and just about plowed one south of there, I will pull the location off of my depth finder and post it. Sumbitch is about 18" around and same distance out of the water.

Last edited by 721Phoenix; 01/08/18 03:54 PM.

Wishin I was fishin!! ..............>(((//*>
2021 Phoenix 819 - Mercury 200 4 Stroke - Ultrex
Her name is Novia Número Cinco.
Humminbird Helix 15 Mega SI - Helix 12 Mega SI - Mega 360
Garmin 1022 w/LVS34 FFS thingy
PB Largemouth - 9.51 - Toledo Bend - March 2014
Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps? [Re: Jarrett Latta] #12568746 01/08/18 04:06 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 162
R
RYAN R Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
R
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 162
Originally Posted By: Jaret Latta
Best advice I have from growing up fishing Rayburn the past 25 years is don't run based on navionics....there are zero marked boat lanes. If you are unsure of an area don't run it.


This.

I try using boat lanes mapped by Navionics but they are worthless!

Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps? [Re: Phoenix_Ed] #12569022 01/08/18 06:49 PM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 227
T
ToledoBassin Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
T
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 227
Originally Posted By: 721Phoenix
I was running up towards Veach Friday and just about plowed one south of there, I will pull the location off of my depth finder and post it. Sumbitch is about 18" around and same distance out of the water.


Sounds like the one that's about 4-5 hundred yards out from the mouth of Coleman.

Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps? [Re: FXfromTx] #12569158 01/08/18 08:16 PM
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,268
T
the skipper Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
T
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,268
Straight out from Coleman there a a big group of trees with some big ones mixed in. There's a few jugs out there but they don't mark them all.

Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps? [Re: the skipper] #12569165 01/08/18 08:19 PM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 227
T
ToledoBassin Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
T
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 227
Originally Posted By: the skipper
Straight out from Coleman there a a big group of trees with some big ones mixed in. There's a few jugs out there but they don't mark them all.

Yes, as of last week the trees with jugs were still not showing, but one large one was out the water.

Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps? [Re: FXfromTx] #12569208 01/08/18 08:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559
J
Jarrett Latta Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
J
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559
And a group between five fingers and Westwood boat ramp. I don't think they are an issue yet but they are definitely there

Re: Sam Rayburn Stumps? [Re: kellisag] #12569522 01/09/18 12:33 AM
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,082
D
dk2429 Online Content
Extreme Angler
Online Content
Extreme Angler
D
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,082
Originally Posted By: kellisag
Originally Posted By: dk2429
I've only been on Rayburn a few times, recent one being a few weeks ago.. I've never hit a stump/shallow water anywhere. Last week we fished all over the place, mostly down toward twin dikes. I decided to do some exploring and ran about halfway up the lake to the north and basically just stayed in the middle wheres the 50ft+ of water and never hit anything or saw anything to hit.. Also trailered to Jackson Hill and ran down to the 147 bridge. There were a lot of stumps up on the end, but I just used some common sense and made sure I stayed in deep water away from the visible stump fields. No issues.

I think the closest I got to screwing up was going from Cassle Boykin to 147.. I wasn't paying attention to my chart, and apparently there's a big shallow point that comes off the bank a good ways. I went from like 20ft to 8ft pretty quick but dropped back down. Now one of the first times to Rayburn a buddy and I stayed up at Hanks Creek.. We fished all that area and up to even farther north real well, and never had any issues.. We just used common sense and stayed deep and watched for stumps.

This doesn't mean don't be cautious on where you are going.. I guess I'm just a lucky person, because I've never had issues hitting anything on that lake. Take advice from the guys that fish this lake daily.. This is just my experience


Maybe you just have a horseshoe up your [censored]. I hope nobody follows your advice!

Running up the middle of the lake in the "deep water" is the exact wrong way if you are anywhere north of Caney.

Between JH and the 147 there are also some ridges/humps out in the middle that will show up if the lake gets low again like 2011.

North of Hanks I guess you can run the river but there are some big ones right in the middle of the "lane" that will eat your lunch as well.


Ha! That's why I said specifically "Take advice from the guys that fish their a lot." Here's the deal though, I don't exactly know where "Caney" is, so I couldn't tell you if I went that far up or not. I didn't go up too far because I am aware of the forest. Again, just my apparently LUCKY experience with the lake.. Now, Toledo Bend is a different story. I idled the whole time I was there and still managed to knock a few out.


Majek 22 Extreme/225 Optimax Pro XS hauled by a 2500HD Duramax



Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3