Forums59
Topics1,057,942
Posts14,293,808
Members144,616
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Your opinion on TPW proposal for Grapevine.
#12493158
11/05/17 08:52 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,385
zaspook
OP
Extreme Angler
|
OP
Extreme Angler
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,385 |
TPW is changing size limits on some lakes doing away with the slot and going to 14" minimum. On Grapeving they are proposing a five fish limit with 2 any size and the rest 18" minimum. That is the strangest I have ever heard of.
|
|
Re: Your opinion on TPW proposal for Grapevine.
[Re: zaspook]
#12493185
11/05/17 09:29 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,747
361V
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,747 |
Kind of a "reverse trophy limit? Not questioning you but....OK I am questioning you. Sure you read that right? Post the article. Thanks, 361V.
Last edited by 361V; 11/05/17 09:30 PM.
|
|
Re: Your opinion on TPW proposal for Grapevine.
[Re: zaspook]
#12493225
11/05/17 09:59 PM
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 61
NCSkeeter
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 61 |
That's similar to the regulations here in NC. We can keep 2 any size and 3 over 14" on most lakes.
|
|
Re: Your opinion on TPW proposal for Grapevine.
[Re: zaspook]
#12493272
11/05/17 10:47 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 40,996
Dan90210 ☮
Jr Deputy Dan
|
Jr Deputy Dan
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 40,996 |
I like the idea of being allowed a few under 14.
On Lewisville yesterday I caught several over 18. Legal but I don't like keeping larger fish.
Also got several 12inch to just under 14. So not legal. Would have liked the option to keep a few of those 12-13 inch fish for supper.
|
|
Re: Your opinion on TPW proposal for Grapevine.
[Re: zaspook]
#12493295
11/05/17 10:58 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 454
stetson
Angler
|
Angler
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 454 |
That's the same length limit as o h ivie
|
|
Re: Your opinion on TPW proposal for Grapevine.
[Re: zaspook]
#12493366
11/05/17 11:45 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 900
m.sherman
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 900 |
It just means they have a over population of fish they need some removed us tournament guys are not killing enough of them
|
|
Re: Your opinion on TPW proposal for Grapevine.
[Re: zaspook]
#12493394
11/06/17 12:07 AM
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,061
One fish Bill
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,061 |
How long does the approval process take? Will the new regs take affect in April or September 2018? A change to 14 inches on Granbury!
Last edited by One fish Bill; 11/06/17 12:09 AM.
|
|
Re: Your opinion on TPW proposal for Grapevine.
[Re: m.sherman]
#12493534
11/06/17 01:30 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,607
SC-001
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,607 |
It just means they have a over population of fish they need some removed us tournament guys are not killing enough of them Tourney guys sure aren't killing the little ones, have to throw them back! Alan Henry has a weird reg like that too.
|
|
Re: Your opinion on TPW proposal for Grapevine.
[Re: zaspook]
#12493565
11/06/17 01:39 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,268
the skipper
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,268 |
It could be to help tournaments in the area. More than likely it's just to control the size populations.
|
|
Re: Your opinion on TPW proposal for Grapevine.
[Re: zaspook]
#12493657
11/06/17 02:26 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,965
206champion
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,965 |
I wander why they leave such a big slot on Fork
Last edited by 206champion; 11/06/17 02:27 AM.
|
|
Re: Your opinion on TPW proposal for Grapevine.
[Re: zaspook]
#12493693
11/06/17 03:01 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 9,666
Bradshuflin aka hunter'sdad
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 9,666 |
Bridgeport going to a straight 14" minimum would be great for tournaments
|
|
Re: Your opinion on TPW proposal for Grapevine.
[Re: zaspook]
#12493697
11/06/17 03:04 AM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,107
Skeeter man ZX225
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,107 |
I think all lakes should be 5 fish over 14 inches then there is only one size for all to keep up with. but politics will not allow that. The Grapevine proposal is stupid. good luck
|
|
Re: Your opinion on TPW proposal for Grapevine.
[Re: Mark Perry]
#12493731
11/06/17 03:40 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,747
361V
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,747 |
Thanks Mark. This seems odd to me. I think in terms of our Redfish limits that allow ONE trophy bull red but allow you to keep several small reds to eat as a successful way of A. removing some smaller fish and B. protecting larger(trophy) fishery. Allowing only a couple small(no minimum) fish but three over 18 doesn't seem like a great plan. If trying to protect the larger fish and encourage removing some of the smaller ones they should allow several "any size/no minimum" with only one over 18".....or "if it ain't broke don't fix it". Just leave it alone. I for one actually believe limits specific to the fishery actually work...sometimes. This Grapevine one doesnt make sense to me.
Last edited by 361V; 11/06/17 08:46 PM.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|