Forums59
Topics1,057,478
Posts14,285,166
Members144,609
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Darvish for Kershaw
#11974114
12/09/16 12:30 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,143
tech
OP
TFF Team Angler
|
OP
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,143 |
Tim Cowlishaw has a column in the DMN saying the Rangers should trade Yu Darvish, a relief pitcher, and either Profar or Odor for Clayton Kershaw.....thoughts?
Trust your own instinct. Your mistakes might as well be your own, instead of someone elses.
|
|
Re: Darvish for Kershaw
[Re: tech]
#11974127
12/09/16 12:40 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,496
Squirrely Dan
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,496 |
They don't have 30+ mill a year or they would just resign Darvish
Fully sponsored by my mom
|
|
Re: Darvish for Kershaw
[Re: tech]
#11974128
12/09/16 12:40 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 52,077
Trickster
Super Freak
|
Super Freak
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 52,077 |
|
|
Re: Darvish for Kershaw
[Re: Trickster]
#11974148
12/09/16 12:58 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 15,591
Happykamper
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 15,591 |
Its a money thing, if they are going to drop that kind of coin way better off keeping Darvish.
|
|
Re: Darvish for Kershaw
[Re: tech]
#11974205
12/09/16 01:38 AM
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,548
Hotrodjrd
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,548 |
They have the money to sign Darvish. It's a matter of do they want to and does Darvish wanna be here. It's been said multiple times that Darvish has no desire to resign with Texas. Don't know how true that is but it was said all this season that he doesn't wanna be here. Based on the fact that they haven't even had conversations would indicate neither side is too awful interested so it's better to get something for him than watch him walk away for nothing in return. If you can pull a deal for Kershaw, you do it in a second. He's from here and lives here in the off season, so at least he'd wanna be here. Texas is prob the only team he'd waive his no trade. It won't happen cause JD thinks prospects will bring us a WS and refuses to trade any but it's fun to dream!
|
|
Re: Darvish for Kershaw
[Re: tech]
#11974211
12/09/16 01:44 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 16,252
Rob W.
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 16,252 |
Not counting the business side of it I would much rather have Kershaw.
|
|
Re: Darvish for Kershaw
[Re: tech]
#11974216
12/09/16 01:47 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 44,571
butch sanders
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 44,571 |
|
|
Re: Darvish for Kershaw
[Re: tech]
#11974242
12/09/16 01:59 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 43,908
Ghost4BH
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 43,908 |
That's a terrible trade considering we need help in the pen too. Its pretty much a wash for starters and we give up a bullpen spot where we need a ton of help. Not to mention our middle infield and spot in the line up. Dumb trade scenario.
|
|
Re: Darvish for Kershaw
[Re: tech]
#11974291
12/09/16 02:25 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 30,557
Duck_Hunter
house cleaner
|
house cleaner
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 30,557 |
Not to mention, Kershaw is 4-7 in 14 postseason starts with a 4.5 ERA.
|
|
Re: Darvish for Kershaw
[Re: tech]
#11974445
12/09/16 03:52 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,496
Squirrely Dan
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,496 |
Darvish is fixing to plitch in a contract year. He's gonna bring his best. Come end of June if rangers aren't in contention then you trade him to help the next season. No reason to anything now
Fully sponsored by my mom
|
|
Re: Darvish for Kershaw
[Re: Squirrely Dan]
#11974483
12/09/16 04:29 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 68,499
Derek ๐
Queen of Bees
|
Queen of Bees
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 68,499 |
They don't have 30+ mill a year or they would just resign Darvish 30mil? He's moved up from the queen of his double wide trailer days.
Ebolacane Researcher CovidNado Chaser McRib Pro Staff Team Beans
|
|
Re: Darvish for Kershaw
[Re: tech]
#11974665
12/09/16 01:24 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,800
BassFever
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,800 |
Darvish is ALWAYS hurt. Let him go.
|
|
Re: Darvish for Kershaw
[Re: Ghost4BH]
#11974694
12/09/16 01:38 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 15,591
Happykamper
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 15,591 |
That's a terrible trade considering we need help in the pen too. Its pretty much a wash for starters and we give up a bullpen spot where we need a ton of help. Not to mention our middle infield and spot in the line up. Dumb trade scenario. Agree
|
|
Re: Darvish for Kershaw
[Re: tech]
#11974807
12/09/16 02:42 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 40,949
Dan90210 โฎ
Jr Deputy Dan
|
Jr Deputy Dan
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 40,949 |
This is a fun what if... But y'all know Kershaw is not going anywhere. He's said he wants to stay in LA his whole career and I feel the a dodgers are just fine with that.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek ๐, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|