http://kfor.com/2016/11/30/hunter-facing-charges-after-admitting-to-shooting-killing-two-dogs/

As to this original post.....

This guy was wrong to shoot those dogs. Just wrong any way you look at it. He committed a felony acording to Ohio law. He should face the consequences for his actions.

Without reading the 8 pages of this I will say that I wouldn't shoot a dog I saw while hunting no matter what he was doing. Some of you are morally corrupt and need to seek help.

Ok, after an hour of research as an official Internet attorney I have found 40.092 of the Texas penal code that says it is a state felony to shoot a dog without the owners permission. So if that dog is not a threat to your livestock or person you best rethink your dog killing policy. It also says this includes stray dogs.

good defense to this is not posting pics on social media

What are the repercussions if someone were to shoot commiedan?
Asking for a friend.

I'm cool,with it. I won't press charges.

would it still be wrong if he ate the dogs?

No.

But great Dane only on Thanksgiving and Christmas.

Well, it happened to me tonight. Sitting in a tree stand behind the house watching 4 deer. Decided to shoot a nice doe, then suddenly they blow out of there. Somebody's big brown and white dog right on their heels... Guess its time to meet the neighbors.

Wow! Not only is he facing felony charges, but he was fired from his job.

The rest of the story.

While I don't condone violence against humans....I like my dog a whole lot more than most humans I meet these days.

Well after 8 pages of reading, I vote this the most sane post.

I saw the clone post on Facebook yesterday claiming that the man was pissed about not getting a deer so he shot the dogs because he just wanted to kill something and that he kept their collars as trophies. Then it said he admitted to these things. This struck me as a bit far fetched. Got thousands of people in an uproar and fast. This has apparently now been removed from Facebook. The original article just said the guy's dogs were missing, he went looking for them, found the guy who shot them, saw a suspicions brush pile, and then got the guy to fess up to shooting the dogs. It said nothing about the dogs going after livestock or wildlife, nor did it say anything about the guy gloating about it and keeping the collars as trophies. Hiding the dogs under the brush indicates just that, he was trying to hide something, which is the only thing that sticks out as a bit shady about this to me. But the law is the law, no matter how stupid, and the hunter broke it unless he can prove that the dogs somehow needed to be killed.

shoot, shovel, and ssshhh.

Out in the country its not some one's French puddle named feefee getting in my tulips. Its someone who's dog lives under their trailer houses skirting and every day runs around chasing whatever it wants. After telling owners over and over, and their response is always will try and contain them but their a dog or Ol' Leroy just loves to hunt.

It sad, its the owners problem not the dog. But after so many times of ruining my hunt or running livestock. pew pew. I value my free time.

obviously you've never owned a dog