Forums59
Topics1,058,113
Posts14,296,493
Members144,618
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Red Ribbon
#10683111
03/10/15 01:55 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 154
AggieRaf
OP
Outdoorsman
|
OP
Outdoorsman
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 154 |
I was looking into a couple of rivers the other night and noticed a term that was used to describe a particular river that I have never seen before.
I know what a blue ribbon river is but does anyone know what a red ribbon river is?
"Many go fishing all their lives without knowing it is not the fish they are after." - Thoreau
|
|
Re: Red Ribbon
[Re: AggieRaf]
#10683181
03/10/15 02:14 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 154
AggieRaf
OP
Outdoorsman
|
OP
Outdoorsman
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 154 |
I'm not sure this is right but I found some fine print on a study and thought I might share for those that don't know. If anyone can tell me is this is true that would be great, as this is a speculation.
Categories based on pounds of trout per mile are: Blue Ribbon (national importance) >600pounds per mile, Red Ribbon (statewide importance) 300 to 600 pounds per mile, Yellow Ribbon (regional importance) 50-300 pounds per mile, Green Ribbon (local importance) <50 pounds per mile.
Aggieraf
"Many go fishing all their lives without knowing it is not the fish they are after." - Thoreau
|
|
Re: Red Ribbon
[Re: AggieRaf]
#10685380
03/10/15 09:52 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 910
winchester44
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 910 |
I watched a Wyoming Fish and Game 3 person crew electro fishing a small creek in Wyoming once. Very interesting set up, all contained in backpacks. Anyhow, that's definitely how they described what they were measuring. They were measuring "pounds of fish per mile". Additionally and were taking note of the species and some of their stomach contents.
Anyhow, there can be a lot more than just that number taken into account when designating a Blue Ribbon fishery. Beyond that, the criteria vary by state and except for Montana, many would say they tend to be applied "loosely". Lastly in some cases there is a large emphasis on criteria that many purist would discount such as public access to the water.
My conclusion has been blue ribbon designation is fairly arbitrary and has at least as much to do with selling fishing licenses as it does objectively ranking trout waters nationally. It also can steer conservation projects towards a few flagship waters at the expense of others that might have greater need.
Last edited by winchester44; 03/12/15 03:55 PM.
|
|
Re: Red Ribbon
[Re: AggieRaf]
#10688960
03/12/15 01:49 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 132
zulo
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 132 |
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|