Forums59
Topics1,050,131
Posts14,152,607
Members144,436
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report.
[Re: La Perla Ranch]
#10138417
07/15/14 06:22 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,614
Ken A.
Groovy
|
Groovy
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,614 |
There is nothing that would make me prouder than to see Texas produce a legit world record largemouth bass - from public or private waters. Many well intended folks have tried through the decades and haven't come close. I respect Dr. Scwatz and others for their efforts but a 13.9 pound bass is not even close. Personally, I believe the heat of the region will work against La Perla even though they have an all they can eat shrimp cocktail buffet. It will take more than ultra deep pockets.
I believe the ONLY reason the bass in California grow to such mammoth proportions is the mild climate and trout. I don't believe a bass will live long enough to get big enough to make world record weight in 90+ degree water temps for several months every year.
Camelot Bell has produced numerous fish over 15# but they are not even close either in my opinion. Guys, a 17# bass is as rare as moon-rock. A 22# bass is more like the Unobtainium found under the Tree of Life on Avatar...
|
|
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report.
[Re: fouzman]
#10138441
07/15/14 06:34 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,614
Ken A.
Groovy
|
Groovy
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,614 |
Ken, I know your company has paid some mighty big $$$ to entertain clients at Lake X. I wonder if TPWD will be able to sell trips to Jalisco while Dr. Schwarz will not be able to? Or is it going to be no fishing pressure, period? Perhaps TPWD learned through the Luminant project and the other 6 lakes that the only way to grow the WW LMB is through intensive forage management and -0- fishing pressure?
The key there is that TPWD does not sell fishing trips to Lake X or any other lake they manage. They accept "donations" to the fishery center and allow the donor to participate in an annual harvesting day once or twice a year. I believe they learned several key things from the Luminant project with regard to what to do and not. While I'm not at liberty to discuss them on the open forum, I am sure Allen Forshage would be happy to share his thoughts with you directly.
|
|
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report.
[Re: Ken A.]
#10138466
07/15/14 06:45 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,385
Fishbreeder
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,385 |
There is nothing that would make me prouder than to see Texas produce a legit world record largemouth bass - from public or private waters. Many well intended folks have tried through the decades and haven't come close. I respect Dr. Scwatz and others for their efforts but a 13.9 pound bass is not even close. Personally, I believe the heat of the region will work against La Perla even though they have an all they can eat shrimp cocktail buffet. It will take more than ultra deep pockets.
I believe the ONLY reason the bass in California grow to such mammoth proportions is the mild climate and trout. I don't believe a bass will live long enough to get big enough to make world record weight in 90+ degree water temps for several months every year.
Camelot Bell has produced numerous fish over 15# but they are not even close either in my opinion. Guys, a 17# bass is as rare as moon-rock. A 22# bass is more like the Unobtainium found under the Tree of Life on Avatar... Pretty much...yep. Those lakes in Cali have another thing, almost zero spawning and recruitment of young bass into the population. The deep bowl shapes of these lakes provide very little spawning habitat and the oligotrophic (nutrient poor) nature of these lakes does not provide well for survival of any bass fry that may hatch out. The "forage" is primarily rainbow trout stocked into the lakes for local fishermen. Trout are extremely nutritionally dense, have no spines, are fusiform in body shape, and easy for a bass to eat a big one. So this these lakes do not need to be eutrophic (nutrient rich and green or weedy) like most of our lakes, nor do they need to be productive in the way of foodstuffs, as these come from outside. So the water is also very clear. This is a very unique situation, not easily duplicated.
Fishbreeder
|
|
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report.
[Re: Fishbreeder]
#10138624
07/15/14 07:49 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,181
JacksonBean
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,181 |
Those lakes in Cali have another thing, almost zero spawning and recruitment of young bass into the population. The deep bowl shapes of these lakes provide very little spawning habitat and the oligotrophic (nutrient poor) nature of these lakes does not provide well for survival of any bass fry that may hatch out.
That's something I've never heard before. Makes sense if you think about it. My limited experience out there was anything but a dink fest. Very interesting.
|
|
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report.
[Re: Fishbreeder]
#10138640
07/15/14 07:55 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559
Jarrett Latta
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559 |
There is nothing that would make me prouder than to see Texas produce a legit world record largemouth bass - from public or private waters. Many well intended folks have tried through the decades and haven't come close. I respect Dr. Scwatz and others for their efforts but a 13.9 pound bass is not even close. Personally, I believe the heat of the region will work against La Perla even though they have an all they can eat shrimp cocktail buffet. It will take more than ultra deep pockets.
I believe the ONLY reason the bass in California grow to such mammoth proportions is the mild climate and trout. I don't believe a bass will live long enough to get big enough to make world record weight in 90+ degree water temps for several months every year.
Camelot Bell has produced numerous fish over 15# but they are not even close either in my opinion. Guys, a 17# bass is as rare as moon-rock. A 22# bass is more like the Unobtainium found under the Tree of Life on Avatar... Pretty much...yep. Those lakes in Cali have another thing, almost zero spawning and recruitment of young bass into the population. The deep bowl shapes of these lakes provide very little spawning habitat and the oligotrophic (nutrient poor) nature of these lakes does not provide well for survival of any bass fry that may hatch out. The "forage" is primarily rainbow trout stocked into the lakes for local fishermen. Trout are extremely nutritionally dense, have no spines, are fusiform in body shape, and easy for a bass to eat a big one. So this these lakes do not need to be eutrophic (nutrient rich and green or weedy) like most of our lakes, nor do they need to be productive in the way of foodstuffs, as these come from outside. So the water is also very clear. This is a very unique situation, not easily duplicated. Plus they have an established gene pool that is far superior to anything we have here in our lakes, public or private.
|
|
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report.
[Re: JacksonBean]
#10138654
07/15/14 08:01 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,614
Ken A.
Groovy
|
Groovy
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,614 |
[quote=Fishbreeder]
Those lakes in Cali have another thing, almost zero spawning and recruitment of young bass into the population. The deep bowl shapes of these lakes provide very little spawning habitat and the oligotrophic (nutrient poor) nature of these lakes does not provide well for survival of any bass fry that may hatch out.
Never thought about it but that makes perfect sense. Only fished two lakes out there (Casitas & Castaic) but they were far from fish factories like what we are used to here in Texas. If you got bit it was a good un....
|
|
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report.
[Re: Jarrett Latta]
#10138670
07/15/14 08:09 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,108
fouzman
Methuselah
|
Methuselah
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,108 |
There is nothing that would make me prouder than to see Texas produce a legit world record largemouth bass - from public or private waters. Many well intended folks have tried through the decades and haven't come close. I respect Dr. Scwatz and others for their efforts but a 13.9 pound bass is not even close. Personally, I believe the heat of the region will work against La Perla even though they have an all they can eat shrimp cocktail buffet. It will take more than ultra deep pockets.
I believe the ONLY reason the bass in California grow to such mammoth proportions is the mild climate and trout. I don't believe a bass will live long enough to get big enough to make world record weight in 90+ degree water temps for several months every year.
Camelot Bell has produced numerous fish over 15# but they are not even close either in my opinion. Guys, a 17# bass is as rare as moon-rock. A 22# bass is more like the Unobtainium found under the Tree of Life on Avatar... Pretty much...yep. Those lakes in Cali have another thing, almost zero spawning and recruitment of young bass into the population. The deep bowl shapes of these lakes provide very little spawning habitat and the oligotrophic (nutrient poor) nature of these lakes does not provide well for survival of any bass fry that may hatch out. The "forage" is primarily rainbow trout stocked into the lakes for local fishermen. Trout are extremely nutritionally dense, have no spines, are fusiform in body shape, and easy for a bass to eat a big one. So this these lakes do not need to be eutrophic (nutrient rich and green or weedy) like most of our lakes, nor do they need to be productive in the way of foodstuffs, as these come from outside. So the water is also very clear. This is a very unique situation, not easily duplicated. Plus they have an established gene pool that is far superior to anything we have here in our lakes, public or private. Huh? There were 20,000 Florida Bass fingerlings taken to California in 1959. Cali really blasted onto the big bass scene in 1973 with a fish from Miramar that was 20+ and the second largest bass ever caught in the US. (I still have the Sports Afield magazine with the story). That fish was a pure-strain Florida. All of these giants out of California are Floridas so I'm not sure what superior gene pool you're referring to.
"Things turn out best for those who make the best of the way things turn out" - Zachary Troy Schrah - a young man with vision far beyond his years.
|
|
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report.
[Re: Ken A.]
#10138747
07/15/14 08:45 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,812
David Rush
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,812 |
[quote=Fishbreeder]
Those lakes in Cali have another thing, almost zero spawning and recruitment of young bass into the population. The deep bowl shapes of these lakes provide very little spawning habitat and the oligotrophic (nutrient poor) nature of these lakes does not provide well for survival of any bass fry that may hatch out.
Never thought about it but that makes perfect sense. Only fished two lakes out there (Casitas & Castaic) but they were far from fish factories like what we are used to here in Texas. If you got bit it was a good un.... They also have much cooler summers.
|
|
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report.
[Re: fouzman]
#10138776
07/15/14 09:00 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559
Jarrett Latta
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559 |
There is nothing that would make me prouder than to see Texas produce a legit world record largemouth bass - from public or private waters. Many well intended folks have tried through the decades and haven't come close. I respect Dr. Scwatz and others for their efforts but a 13.9 pound bass is not even close. Personally, I believe the heat of the region will work against La Perla even though they have an all they can eat shrimp cocktail buffet. It will take more than ultra deep pockets.
I believe the ONLY reason the bass in California grow to such mammoth proportions is the mild climate and trout. I don't believe a bass will live long enough to get big enough to make world record weight in 90+ degree water temps for several months every year.
Camelot Bell has produced numerous fish over 15# but they are not even close either in my opinion. Guys, a 17# bass is as rare as moon-rock. A 22# bass is more like the Unobtainium found under the Tree of Life on Avatar... Pretty much...yep. Those lakes in Cali have another thing, almost zero spawning and recruitment of young bass into the population. The deep bowl shapes of these lakes provide very little spawning habitat and the oligotrophic (nutrient poor) nature of these lakes does not provide well for survival of any bass fry that may hatch out. The "forage" is primarily rainbow trout stocked into the lakes for local fishermen. Trout are extremely nutritionally dense, have no spines, are fusiform in body shape, and easy for a bass to eat a big one. So this these lakes do not need to be eutrophic (nutrient rich and green or weedy) like most of our lakes, nor do they need to be productive in the way of foodstuffs, as these come from outside. So the water is also very clear. This is a very unique situation, not easily duplicated. Plus they have an established gene pool that is far superior to anything we have here in our lakes, public or private. Huh? There were 20,000 Florida Bass fingerlings taken to California in 1959. Cali really blasted onto the big bass scene in 1973 with a fish from Miramar that was 20+ and the second largest bass ever caught in the US. (I still have the Sports Afield magazine with the story). That fish was a pure-strain Florida. All of these giants out of California are Floridas so I'm not sure what superior gene pool you're referring to. I could be wrong but smaller lakes that have consistently contained giant bass would be passing on superior genes. They aren't spawning with 2lb northern strain males last time I checked.
|
|
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report.
[Re: La Perla Ranch]
#10138845
07/15/14 09:21 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,871
Bullet20XrD
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,871 |
So TPWD basically dooms one of the best public big bass lakes in the State by dumping a bunch of triploid grass carp in it, killing all of the vegetation which will in turn ruin water clarity and forage base, then sell offspring from fish donated from that program (and more than likely that lake) to a private landowner to grow genetically superior fish in a stock pond that you will have to pay to fish? Is that basically what's going on... or am I way off base? Sorry, just trying to catch up.
|
|
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report.
[Re: La Perla Ranch]
#10138886
07/15/14 09:37 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 129
larry rasure
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 129 |
Man they are just trying to do something special. Fry from one big bass isn't going to effect any of us. Would be interested in following the progress .
|
|
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report.
[Re: Bullet20XrD]
#10138914
07/15/14 09:48 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 606
nwest10
Pro Angler
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 606 |
So TPWD basically dooms one of the best public big bass lakes in the State by dumping a bunch of triploid grass carp in it, killing all of the vegetation which will in turn ruin water clarity and forage base, then sell offspring from fish donated from that program (and more than likely that lake) to a private landowner to grow genetically superior fish in a stock pond that you will have to pay to fish? Is that basically what's going on... or am I way off base? Sorry, just trying to catch up. There were 750,000 3" to 4" fry from the program stocked in Conroe in 2013 ( if this is the lake you are referring to ). With the grass that was just getting flooded at the time of the stocking last year and the grass that's now flooded there's a good chance that a large number of these fry survived and will grow quickly. These were just some of the hundreds of thousands that were stocked in several Tx. lakes that included Rayburn, Conroe, and Toledo B.
|
|
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report.
[Re: La Perla Ranch]
#10138967
07/15/14 10:19 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559
Jarrett Latta
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,559 |
There's a big difference between hydrilla and flooded shoreline grass.
|
|
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report.
[Re: La Perla Ranch]
#10138976
07/15/14 10:25 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,108
fouzman
Methuselah
|
Methuselah
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 50,108 |
nwest, which 'program' ? 750k fry.
"Things turn out best for those who make the best of the way things turn out" - Zachary Troy Schrah - a young man with vision far beyond his years.
|
|
Re: La Perla Ranch...new Lake Jalisco progress report.
[Re: La Perla Ranch]
#10139095
07/15/14 11:15 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,268
the skipper
TFF Celebrity
|
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,268 |
This does show what money can do! I'm only mad I won't be able to fish it and TPWD doesn't make it public. I don't blame him for using his land and money to do what he's doing. I would to in a heartbeat. It does sound like TPWD should explain what's going on and the details of what they are doing not only here but with the "illegal" stockings and for that matter, all stockings. After all, we do fund them, we should be able to see where that money is going.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|