texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
masterut94, jtron13, Pops70, CrankyVet, Cowtownhound
119651 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 125,195
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 105,424
Bob Davis 97,622
John175☮ 86,152
Pilothawk 83,941
Mark Perry 74,894
Derek 🐝 68,517
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,059,352
Posts14,318,525
Members144,651
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 4 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 14 15
Re: closing gar area? Hopefully so they can dynamite the hole [Re: Droyhef] #9796369 03/05/14 12:29 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 26,660
B
Bass_Bustin_Texan Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
B
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 26,660
Originally Posted By: Dawson Hefner
If you think most lakes you fish have alligator gar in them in abundance then either one of two things are true: You spend most of your time on choke canyon,falcon,livingston, and rayburn -or- you do not know the difference between a spotted gar and an alligator gar.

Thanks


I personally know the difference, not going to speak for everyone else. BUT I will reply since I stated "just about every lake I visit has gar". I have been to each of the lakes you mentioned. I have been to most lakes in East Texas. Most of those rivers you mentioned empty or come from the lakes we have. So if the river has them, the lakes do too.


You can avoid having ulcers by adapting to the situation: If you fall in the mud puddle, check your pockets for fish. ~Unknown

Open your eyes & look within, are you satisfied with the life youre living.

No matter how good or bad you have it, wake up each day thankful for your life. Someone somewhere else is desperately fighting for theirs.
Re: closing gar area? Hopefully so they can dynamite the hole [Re: NoWeighers] #9796455 03/05/14 01:21 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,020
G
grout-scout Online Sleepy
TFF Guru
Online Sleepy
TFF Guru
G
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,020
You need to add Amistad to that list of alligator gar lakes.

Now if that little protection bill wants to say "no lakes included", then that's just fine with me. Cut off the rivers access but leave the lakes alone.

Last edited by grout-scout; 03/05/14 01:24 PM.
Re: closing gar area? Hopefully so they can dynamite the hole [Re: NoWeighers] #9796651 03/05/14 02:26 PM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,860
N
NoWeighers Online Content OP
Extreme Angler
OP Online Content
Extreme Angler
N
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,860
I asure you that I know the difference between Alligator Gar and Longnose gar.. And if you think that that aligator gar and bass just swim around peacefully in the same water then you need to come to some of those southern waters you mentioned and look around the lakes.

As far as Alligator gar being a river fish only, nothing could be farther from the truth. You are right, our rivers are full of them, but so are the lakes. You can tie up to any main lake marker on Falcon in the summer. Lets say marker three or four. Where the river is only about three miles wide.. Some would call it a lake.

You can watch the whales play all day long, as they gently roll, basking in the sun..

Nobody is advocating the the wiping out of the gar. But some common sense management with different rules for different lakes is not hard to accomplish.. They have different speed limits for different roads. They change dove and deer and quail limits as needed.. What's so hard about doing it with gar where needed?

And if you think that gar check to see what kind of fish they are eating then we certainly need to quit talking. They are opportunistic feeders and eat what is readily available. If bass are in high numbers, they are going to eat a lot of bass.. And I assume TPWD wants high bass numbers because they keep stocking them and 90% or more of their money (fisheries) comes from bass fishermen.

Aligator gar growth rates at Falcon are off the charts. We have three year old fish reproducing and 100 pound fish that are five or less years old.. We do not have a gar shortage.. Down here we have a plague..

Until you have seen it you have no idea what I am talking about.

It is past time to remove, or at the minimum increase the daily bag limit on gar.


James Bendele
Falcon Lake Tackle
"On the eighth day, Man invented the Fish Hook."
Re: closing gar area? Hopefully so they can dynamite the hole [Re: Bass_Bustin_Texan] #9796667 03/05/14 02:29 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,644
D
Droyhef Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
D
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,644
Originally Posted By: Bass_Bustin_Texan
Originally Posted By: Dawson Hefner
If you think most lakes you fish have alligator gar in them in abundance then either one of two things are true: You spend most of your time on choke canyon,falcon,livingston, and rayburn -or- you do not know the difference between a spotted gar and an alligator gar.

Thanks


I personally know the difference, not going to speak for everyone else. BUT I will reply since I stated "just about every lake I visit has gar". I have been to each of the lakes you mentioned. I have been to most lakes in East Texas. Most of those rivers you mentioned empty or come from the lakes we have. So if the river has them, the lakes do too.


Hopefully you did not take it personally, but there are a large number of people who honestly do not know one from the other despite their opinion. Youtube serves as pretty good evidence of this.

The proposition as it reads would not close the areas to fishing, only to gar angling. *However* I think that if passed then it would not be long before the state tried to close all fishing in those areas because what is proposed right now says nothing for those fishing for catfish with fresh bait which during warm weather is very similar to gar fishing. Essentially, to do what they are proposing effectively would pretty much require closing areas to fishing, and none of us want that.

I do think alligator gar are an under appreciated/realized resource that needs some management, but that is another argument not associated directly with this proposal.
Dawson


http://www.texasmegafishadventures.com
Guided rod and reel fishing trips for Alligator gar on the Trinity River as well as some other places
903-721-4296
dawson@texasmegafishadventures.com
Re: closing gar area? Hopefully so they can dynamite the hole [Re: NoWeighers] #9796701 03/05/14 02:38 PM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,860
N
NoWeighers Online Content OP
Extreme Angler
OP Online Content
Extreme Angler
N
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,860
Another thing about this proposal is that they have not defined what the criteria would be for closing the areas to the pursuit of gar. How much rain? How much water flow? For how long?

There are no parameters set out here, only the gift of power to do as they decide.

Sounds like Obammacare.. We have to pass the law to see what's in it..

This is a bad precedent to set..


James Bendele
Falcon Lake Tackle
"On the eighth day, Man invented the Fish Hook."
Re: closing gar area? Hopefully so they can dynamite the hole [Re: NoWeighers] #9796715 03/05/14 02:42 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,644
D
Droyhef Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
D
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,644
Originally Posted By: NoWeighers
I asure you that I know the difference between Alligator Gar and Longnose gar.. And if you think that that aligator gar and bass just swim around peacefully in the same water then you need to come to some of those southern waters you mentioned and look around the lakes.

As far as Alligator gar being a river fish only, nothing could be farther from the truth. You are right, our rivers are full of them, but so are the lakes. You can tie up to any main lake marker on Falcon in the summer. Lets say marker three or four. Where the river is only about three miles wide.. Some would call it a lake.

You can watch the whales play all day long, as they gently roll, basking in the sun..

Nobody is advocating the the wiping out of the gar. But some common sense management with different rules for different lakes is not hard to accomplish.. They have different speed limits for different roads. They change dove and deer and quail limits as needed.. What's so hard about doing it with gar where needed?

And if you think that gar check to see what kind of fish they are eating then we certainly need to quit talking. They are opportunistic feeders and eat what is readily available. If bass are in high numbers, they are going to eat a lot of bass.. And I assume TPWD wants high bass numbers because they keep stocking them and 90% or more of their money (fisheries) comes from bass fishermen.

Aligator gar growth rates at Falcon are off the charts. We have three year old fish reproducing and 100 pound fish that are five or less years old.. We do not have a gar shortage.. Down here we have a plague..

Until you have seen it you have no idea what I am talking about.

It is past time to remove, or at the minimum increase the daily bag limit on gar.



I am not saying that they only live in rivers, I am saying that in a natural setting they did.

Bass are ambush predators that need cover and vegetation to thrive, something you are in short supply of down south with this extended drought. Bass are going to be some of the first losers with your lake drying up like it is, as I am sure you are experiencing. The reduction in spawning habitat and available cover is hurting your bass fishery more than anything else.

You do not have 3 year old alligator gar breeding. 100% certain of that and you can call any biologist you want on that. You do not have 5 year old 100 pound fish either, check that one with tpwd too if you want, they would be interested in samples if you could get them, I am not bsing on that point, I would be too for that matter.

Per a parks and wildlife study the main diet of alligator gar is sandbass, channel cats, drum, and gizzard shad which except the drum are all schooling fish that breed like rats.

I do not disagree at all about why Parks stocks bass, that is what the public wants to see so they do it whether or not it produces the desired result.

As our lakes age improved fisheries would be better realized through habitat improvement rather than stocking, if conditions do not exist for said stockings to thrive then they will not. Water levels can not be raised artificially but spawning structures and cover for fry can be added although it is expensive.


http://www.texasmegafishadventures.com
Guided rod and reel fishing trips for Alligator gar on the Trinity River as well as some other places
903-721-4296
dawson@texasmegafishadventures.com
Re: closing gar area? Hopefully so they can dynamite the hole [Re: NoWeighers] #9796729 03/05/14 02:44 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,644
D
Droyhef Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
D
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,644
Originally Posted By: NoWeighers
Another thing about this proposal is that they have not defined what the criteria would be for closing the areas to the pursuit of gar. How much rain? How much water flow? For how long?

There are no parameters set out here, only the gift of power to do as they decide.

Sounds like Obammacare.. We have to pass the law to see what's in it..

This is a bad precedent to set..


EXACTLY, which is why everyone should be against it. We may disagree on most points but that is the big one we agree on right there. Nothing is defined which is what I said over in the rough fish section where several people are in favor of doing this...


http://www.texasmegafishadventures.com
Guided rod and reel fishing trips for Alligator gar on the Trinity River as well as some other places
903-721-4296
dawson@texasmegafishadventures.com
Re: closing gar area? Hopefully so they can dynamite the hole [Re: NoWeighers] #9796807 03/05/14 03:07 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,171
D
dmunsie Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
D
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,171
Originally Posted By: NoWeighers
And if you think that gar check to see what kind of fish they are eating then we certainly need to quit talking. They are opportunistic feeders and eat what is readily available. If bass are in high numbers, they are going to eat a lot of bass.


With all due respect, that's just 100% false information. Time after time, every study about the guts of an Alligator Gar show their primary diet is shad, buffalo and carp.

"If bass are in high numbers....." probably means you have other management issues going on since bass fry are not being eaten enough by predator fish.

Re: closing gar area? Hopefully so they can dynamite the hole [Re: Droyhef] #9796834 03/05/14 03:13 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,171
D
dmunsie Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
D
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,171
Originally Posted By: Dawson Hefner
The second part of my issue besides them being vague is that they are not even interested in biting a hook most of the time during active spawning activity.
Thanks


Think beyond that, think how easy it is to shoot a large female with a bow during the spawn. For that reason alone I'm 100% for this proposal.

Re: closing gar area? Hopefully so they can dynamite the hole [Re: NoWeighers] #9797137 03/05/14 04:39 PM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,860
N
NoWeighers Online Content OP
Extreme Angler
OP Online Content
Extreme Angler
N
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,860
Please show me the resuls of these studys.. There just aren't any.. Or certainly not enough to say that they do not eat bass.

They have not published all these studys..

You are repeating what you have heard..

The most extensive one done showed 60% of gar stomach contents were bass..

Done by Texas A&M no less..

I'm done here..


James Bendele
Falcon Lake Tackle
"On the eighth day, Man invented the Fish Hook."
Re: closing gar area? Hopefully so they can dynamite the hole [Re: NoWeighers] #9797274 03/05/14 05:25 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 366
S
slimjim Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
S
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 366
.

Last edited by slimjim; 03/08/14 04:50 AM. Reason: .
Re: closing gar area? Hopefully so they can dynamite the hole [Re: NoWeighers] #9797280 03/05/14 05:26 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 366
S
slimjim Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
S
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 366
.

Last edited by slimjim; 03/08/14 05:09 AM. Reason: .
Re: closing gar area? Hopefully so they can dynamite the hole [Re: NoWeighers] #9797396 03/05/14 06:06 PM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,860
N
NoWeighers Online Content OP
Extreme Angler
OP Online Content
Extreme Angler
N
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,860
Sorry I had missed one of the posts earlier..

I was sitting in my shop with TWO TPWD biologists this morning. And we were talking about the three year old Alligator gar that we cut open this last fall that were full of eggs and milt..

I guess they were just carrying that stuff around for grins??

And yes they were aged by TPWD's best Biologists in San Antonio and Heart of the Hills Research center..

These fish are not old like you think.. We have five year old 100 pounders!!

And our bass wouldn't be suffering with the reduced cover, which is currently full of gar, if the gar weren't here eating them..

So don't tell me these three year old gar aren't reproducing.. I have seen it with my own eyes and the BIOLOGISTS will confirm this for you if you give them a call tomorrow at the San Antonio office.. They are here doing a shock survey today.

Ask for Randy Myers or John Dennis.. Their number is 210-688-9460.


James Bendele
Falcon Lake Tackle
"On the eighth day, Man invented the Fish Hook."
Re: closing gar area? Hopefully so they can dynamite the hole [Re: NoWeighers] #9797399 03/05/14 06:09 PM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,860
N
NoWeighers Online Content OP
Extreme Angler
OP Online Content
Extreme Angler
N
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,860
P.S. I have the study from Lake Guerrero in PDF form and do not know how to post it here.. I will be glad to e-mail it to anyone that wants it..

And no lake compares more to Falcon than Lake Guerrero..

Last edited by NoWeighers; 03/05/14 06:09 PM.

James Bendele
Falcon Lake Tackle
"On the eighth day, Man invented the Fish Hook."
Re: closing gar area? Hopefully so they can dynamite the hole [Re: NoWeighers] #9797500 03/05/14 06:38 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 366
S
slimjim Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
S
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 366
.

Last edited by slimjim; 03/08/14 04:52 AM. Reason: .
Page 4 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 14 15
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2025 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3