texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Mike Hall, SOFdude, onlyme, sandeez, Bward
119613 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 124,712
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 104,549
Bob Davis 96,410
John175☮ 86,137
Pilothawk 83,925
Mark Perry 74,867
Derek 🐝 68,501
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,057,724
Posts14,289,636
Members144,613
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Would it of been better for BASS and FLW to of kept the 150hp rating? [Re: hopalong] #8653195 03/01/13 11:33 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,613
horton5303 Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,613
Originally Posted By: hopalong
why does everyone think "bigger/newer" is better? I have an 82 champion 184/96 johnson fast strike (210hp dyno)/all the best of the best goodies including brand new 998/898hd units and all total I have about 15,000.00 tied up in a boat that will fish as good and sometimes better than a big ole shiny 65,000.00 super rig.
sorry but just like trucks, I do not need the newest prettiest to be just as good as anyone else, it just escapes me how some can sink over 100k in a boat and pickup.



This^^^ Good post. cheers


Offshore Charter Captain at Osprey Cruises 55ft Head Boat Osprey II, South Padre Island.,. http://www.ospreycruises.com/osprey-fishing-trips/
Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: Would it of been better for BASS and FLW to of kept the 150hp rating? [Re: hopalong] #8654364 03/02/13 04:28 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,854
C
crankn101 Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
C
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,854
Originally Posted by hopalong
why does everyone think "bigger/newer" is better? I have an 82 champion 184/96 johnson fast strike (210hp dyno)/all the best of the best goodies including brand new 998/898hd units and all total I have about 15,000.00 tied up in a boat that will fish as good and sometimes better than a big ole shiny 65,000.00 super rig.
sorry but just like trucks, I do not need the newest prettiest to be just as good as anyone else, it just escapes me how some can sink over 100k in a boat and pickup.


Oh Hop, so young and naive.


Re: Would it of been better for BASS and FLW to of kept the 150hp rating? [Re: Ridgeline] #8655842 03/02/13 07:16 PM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,908
Kat-man-do Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,908
Decide which is more important to you in your finite life span, then go after that. If it's fishing and the tools you want (need aside), then do that. You only live once, how much does it mean to you?

Re: Would it of been better for BASS and FLW to of kept the 150hp rating? [Re: Ridgeline] #8655885 03/02/13 07:44 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,390
F
FMJshooter Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
F
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,390
Work all the time instead of fishing to pay for your fishing boat eeks wink

Last edited by FMJshooter; 03/02/13 07:45 PM.
Re: Would it of been better for BASS and FLW to of kept the 150hp rating? [Re: Ridgeline] #8657485 03/03/13 07:33 AM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,568
D
Devil Horse Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
D
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,568
fact is way back in the 70s the hp limit for BASS was 85hp, this is what they should have never got away from. Its not even logical to think one needs a 20 foot boat with 250 hp with all the latest electronics to fish from.

Its absoultely ridiculous that anyone would spend $40-80k on a bassboat. Manufactures have to get a big laugh out of that.

Re: Would it of been better for BASS and FLW to of kept the 150hp rating? [Re: crankn101] #8657556 03/03/13 11:56 AM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 121,182
hopalong Offline
Pescador Loco
Offline
Pescador Loco
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 121,182
Originally Posted by crankn101
Originally Posted by hopalong
why does everyone think "bigger/newer" is better? I have an 82 champion 184/96 johnson fast strike (210hp dyno)/all the best of the best goodies including brand new 998/898hd units and all total I have about 15,000.00 tied up in a boat that will fish as good and sometimes better than a big ole shiny 65,000.00 super rig.
sorry but just like trucks, I do not need the newest prettiest to be just as good as anyone else, it just escapes me how some can sink over 100k in a boat and pickup.


Oh Hop, so young and naive.

:rolfmao: cheers that is what I get for venturing out of the OT.

Last edited by hopalong; 03/03/13 11:59 AM.

" Hop, set the hook"!
hopalong 99,999
TexDawg 99,999
FJB! not my president by a long shot!

lake fork FISHERMANS COVE MARINA/reservations - 903 474 7479
Re: Would it of been better for BASS and FLW to of kept the 150hp rating? [Re: Ridgeline] #8657738 03/03/13 02:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 561
Hoghunter36 Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 561
I remember the days that I was cashing checks from a 14 ' lonestar with a 25 behind it and a flasher screwed to the seat. Those were the good ole days! I know fish from a 92 21' astro that I paid three grand for! Don't cash checks these day cause I'm to busy running my son around the junior trails! But If I had the money to throw away I sure would have one of them new fancy boats!

Re: Would it of been better for BASS and FLW to of kept the 150hp rating? [Re: Devil Horse] #8657899 03/03/13 03:03 PM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 26
R
Ridgeline Offline OP
Outdoorsman
OP Offline
Outdoorsman
R
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 26

I didn't know that is was an 85 hp before that. Wow. Weird thing is back in 2000 the 150 hp boat at 18 ft would cost you 24k loaded. Now it is $33k loaded. Wow. 19 ft with 200 loaded cost 30k now $41k. 20 ft was $45k with 250 now $55k. Now this is the small graphs so equal. Then fuel now $4 a gallon opposed to $2 a gallon it sure expensive to have and go.

Re: Would it of been better for BASS and FLW to of kept the 150hp rating? [Re: Hoghunter36] #8658645 03/03/13 07:50 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 637
O
OldChamp Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
O
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 637
Originally Posted By: Hoghunter36
I remember the days that I was cashing checks from a 14 ' lonestar with a 25 behind it and a flasher screwed to the seat. Those were the good ole days!


25hp? Wow - that was a big engine back in the day. We had to make do with an 18hp on the back of a 14ft Alumacraft and a sculling paddle.

The good ole days were when the first electric trolling motors came out and we thought we were in hog heaven not havin' to scull the boat down a bank!




Re: Would it of been better for BASS and FLW to of kept the 150hp rating? [Re: Ridgeline] #8660741 03/04/13 07:44 AM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,568
D
Devil Horse Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
D
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,568
the real meaning of fishing was lost many years ago. Nowdays its about looking good at the ramp for many regardless of what it cost.

Re: Would it of been better for BASS and FLW to of kept the 150hp rating? [Re: Ridgeline] #8661611 03/04/13 04:05 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 637
O
OldChamp Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
O
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 637
This thread has me wondering - given today's cost of materials and labor could existing bass boat hull designs (say Ranger, Bass Cat, Skeeter, Legend, etc.) be cost engineered to reduce retail cost significantly by eliminating bells, whistles, and frills without sacrificing hull strength and durability?

Say 25% less to bring them more in reach of a larger customer base.

How and which of the bells, whistles, and frills could be eliminated or replaced with lower cost parts and materials etc?

For instance... all gel coat and no metal flake and fancy logo graphics; fixed cleats instead of popups; why do I need lights in the livewell - fish can't read; other interior amenities; etc.?




Re: Would it of been better for BASS and FLW to of kept the 150hp rating? [Re: Ridgeline] #8661881 03/04/13 05:08 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,665
S
scott01 Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
S
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,665
You can catch just as many fish out of the smaller (18') boats with lower hp engine, 150 hp. The biggest thing I see between them is the safety factor of the 20' over the 18' in rough water. Been fishing a long time and run a 20 ft boat now. It's night and day between that and my first glass boat which was a 15', my second one 16' and the countless 18' boats I've fished out of. Just the smoother, dryer, safer ride is great. But I agree, new boats are out of my market too. Mines a paid off 1997 model.

Re: Would it of been better for BASS and FLW to of kept the 150hp rating? [Re: Ridgeline] #8666838 03/05/13 05:00 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 171
N
nitro_898 Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
N
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 171
A limit of 150 HP on tournaments would hurt the market. It would kill the high end boat sales because anyone who could afford and so desired a 21+ footer with 200-250 would be excluded from fishing those tourneys with the lower limit. With the higher HP limit, anyone with a 150 can still participate, so it's open to a wider range of owners.

Just because the upper tourney limit is 250 doesn't mean you have to have the maximum HP allowed to be competitive.

Re: Would it of been better for BASS and FLW to of kept the 150hp rating? [Re: nitro_898] #8670760 03/06/13 01:03 PM
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,268
T
the skipper Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
T
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,268
Originally Posted By: nitro_898
A limit of 150 HP on tournaments would hurt the market. It would kill the high end boat sales because anyone who could afford and so desired a 21+ footer with 200-250 would be excluded from fishing those tourneys with the lower limit. With the higher HP limit, anyone with a 150 can still participate, so it's open to a wider range of owners.

Just because the upper tourney limit is 250 doesn't mean you have to have the maximum HP allowed to be competitive.


True, but I think the rise in hp limits has also been the driving force in boat prices as now it is a competition to see who has the biggest and baddest. HP limits dont directly effect the weekend guys but, you see joe blow win while in a so and so with a 250 and thats the rage. Kind of like how nascar started. There are many other factors driving the price but look at the cost difference between a 150 and a 250. Rediculous! As they say, you have to pay to play!

Re: Would it of been better for BASS and FLW to of kept the 150hp rating? [Re: Ridgeline] #8670858 03/06/13 01:36 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,586
gary purdy Offline
TFF Guru
Offline
TFF Guru
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,586
The reason they abandoned the 150hp rule is real easy. They could`nt regulate or inforce it. They were discussing changing the rule at a bass tournament. At the lake during the tournament playing with a radar gun, when all of a sudden one of the pro`s came by their boat and clocked 83mph in his tournament rigged 18ft bass boat with a 150 Merc. They looked at each other shaking their heads then one turned to the other and said that guy carry`s an extra trolling motor too. Believe it or not some guys have the money to buy any boat and pull rig they might want.


The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything. Remember what He has done and remember that He is not done yet!-- GOD IS GOOD
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3