|
Forums59
Topics1,058,999
Posts14,312,245
Members144,640
| |
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
 Re: Skeeter SX vs ZX 200
[Re: Donald Harper]
#7113732
01/31/12 04:35 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 16
jamack
Green Horn
|
|
Green Horn
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 16 |
I have a 06 model sx. No wood, and has an aerated livewell. Its only 18'6" and only rated for 125hp. The newer models, even the 17'6" length ones are rated more hp. I was told this was because of the newer hi-teck transom and stringer system which the newer boats come with. This makes sence to me. Love my little sx, but just wish it was bigger
|
|
|
Re: Skeeter SX vs ZX 200
[Re: backatit]
#7114809
01/31/12 08:45 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 787
backatit
OP
Pro Angler
|
|
OP
Pro Angler
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 787 |
how much lower is the price of an 2005 SX vs ZX
|
|
|
Re: Skeeter SX vs ZX 200
[Re: backatit]
#7115359
01/31/12 11:13 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 20,210
Donald Harper
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 20,210 |
Should be about $4,000 difference. That $10K price difference narrows down the older they get.
Each person you work with holds some promise to your future success. Websiite Sponsors: www.eletewater.com - Staying Hydrated www.lakeoviachic.com - Booking Mexico Trips 20 Hot Spot Mapping - GPS Contour Chips - Custom Spinner Baits - Jigs -Spooks Pure Extracts - Minnow-Night Crawler-Crayfish-Craylic
|
|
|
Re: Skeeter SX vs ZX 200
[Re: backatit]
#7117033
02/01/12 07:51 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 787
backatit
OP
Pro Angler
|
|
OP
Pro Angler
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 787 |
The SX does not seem very popular compared to the ZX
|
|
|
Re: Skeeter SX vs ZX 200
[Re: backatit]
#7117657
02/01/12 02:59 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 330
Lucas Lures
Angler
|
|
Angler
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 330 |
The SX does not seem very popular compared to the ZX +1
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|
