Forums59
Topics1,059,377
Posts14,319,036
Members144,651
|
Most Online39,925 Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
Re: bomber crankbaits
[Re: David Parker]
#6414197
07/19/11 02:09 AM
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,024
90 5.0
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,024 |
The wire was to keep the hooks from pulling out of the balsa but the diving bills break on rocks easily because they are acrylic plastic.Lee Sisson pretty much made the same bait as bagley except he used a very flexible plastic lip (circuit board material as he called it)that would bend and not break.His bills are thinner and hunt or search better than the acrylic bagleys do.Bagley is also now using the same lip/bill on select baits as well.The bomber 5,6 and 7A have a heavier poly?bill than the 4A.The 4A and sqA are acrylic I believe. the old school bagleys had a flexible thin lip that would take a serious beating, it was more like a lexan type material don't know what year they went ot the other lips as i haven't bought one in decades.. 
|
|
Re: bomber crankbaits
[Re: 90 5.0]
#6414471
07/19/11 03:21 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,526
fish4bass
TFF Guru
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,526 |
The original Bomber factory is up in Gainesville, Cooke County. They were developed to fish Texoma back in the day before the Stripers to troll for black bass. The brand was sold many years ago but had a interesting start.
And I know who "Jeff" is.
|
|
Re: bomber crankbaits
[Re: 90 5.0]
#6415327
07/19/11 02:11 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,283
David Parker
TFF Team Angler
|
TFF Team Angler
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,283 |
That is a good looking old school bagley.I have that same umco box in the pic.Lexan is the correct material,I just kept thinking acrylic.Yes those bills are the same ones that the tip end will break in the rocks.The deep divingkiller b with the angled lexan bill broke for me more than the diving b did.I still collect and use bagleys just not around rocks and I have put away all the ones like whats in your pic from the 70,s.I would still fish those too if I could replace them for the same price as the newer model.
|
|
Re: bomber crankbaits
[Re: David Parker]
#6415525
07/19/11 03:02 PM
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,024
90 5.0
Extreme Angler
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,024 |
That is a good looking old school bagley.I have that same umco box in the pic.Lexan is the correct material,I just kept thinking acrylic.Yes those bills are the same ones that the tip end will break in the rocks.The deep divingkiller b with the angled lexan bill broke for me more than the diving b did.I still collect and use bagleys just not around rocks and I have put away all the ones like whats in your pic from the 70,s.I would still fish those too if I could replace them for the same price as the newer model. I love them, but i can't replace them so unless i find myself in the BASSMasters classic and that's all that they will hit i'm not taking them out of my antique collection. I throw bombers,normans and h2o's normally now, but for me they can't touch my original bagleys for catching fish. I've never had a tip end break in rocks, the shallow divers that have the eye on the nose and the lip glued into the body i've had some knock out of the glue in one solid piece but not break. What really chaps my hide is when you hang a solid fish on the baits today without the lip wire and the lip braks off, fish gets away and you're left with the lip and the eyelet and a money winning fish swimming around trying to throw your broken in half bait out of it's mouth
Last edited by 90 5.0; 07/19/11 03:03 PM.
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|