texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Dyno, EastCapeSkiffs, blustream, JustProctor, Faith Nunez
119597 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
TexDawg 124,499
hopalong 121,182
Bigbob_FTW 104,146
Bob Davis 95,663
John175☮ 86,126
Pilothawk 83,921
Mark Perry 74,867
Derek 🐝 68,490
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,056,866
Posts14,275,973
Members144,597
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
The 16" Under #6000640 03/28/11 11:55 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,391
J
jbassman Offline OP
TFF Team Angler
OP Offline
TFF Team Angler
J
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,391
We fish the Mega, on Fork, son catches a under (on our board) 2.67 on our scale. Off to weigh-in we go, this fish is close I will admit, but does go under the line.

We would never try to cheat, just trying to win a truck; he takes the fish to the tanks and ask can I use the courtesy check board? (Do not have one).

Dad now what? I tell him the fish is good going with it, he hands the fish to the guy doing the measuring, CHAD is saying my son's name etc, and then they say the fish is to long.

Now the game warden wants to talk, he tells my son go get your board and bring it down here, while he holds my son DL and fish.
I go get the board (Check-It Stick) the warden starts measuring the fish (At least 5min) not kidding. People looking at us like we are Cheaters, any way he finally says Quote (Man this is so close 1/32 over??? 1/32 under? Long story short, The Warden (Great Guy) tells my son I am not going to give you a ticket I can see how close either way this fish was. THANKS YOU SIR.
DRAMA

Moritz Chevrolet - 9101 Camp Bowie W Blvd, Fort Worth, TX - Monte Coon (817) 696-2003
Re: The 16" Under [Re: jbassman] #6000661 03/28/11 12:07 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 234
D
dynatrakben194 Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
D
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 234
did the fish count in tourn.??

Re: The 16" Under [Re: jbassman] #6000670 03/28/11 12:11 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 962
B
blackskeeter Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
B
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 962
I hav seen this happen a bunch on that lak and 99% of the time it's an honest mistake and people measure fish differently. There is a tpwd way to measure butit doesn't take but a slight difference to make 1/32" also I have seen tourneys not measure right. If it's that close I usually won't chance it but for my boy I might.


IT IS WHAT IT IS!!

www.trinitycustomrods.com
Re: The 16" Under [Re: blackskeeter] #6000680 03/28/11 12:14 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 962
B
blackskeeter Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
B
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 962
Oh and they really should have had a courtesy board. Fish tense and relax in the livewell and I've seen them change a 1/8" or better.


IT IS WHAT IT IS!!

www.trinitycustomrods.com
Re: The 16" Under [Re: blackskeeter] #6000706 03/28/11 12:24 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 847
L
Little Red Nitro Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
L
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 847
Man this sucks, at least he didn't get a ticket. I can't believe they didn't have a courtesy board.

Re: The 16" Under [Re: Little Red Nitro] #6000727 03/28/11 12:32 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,391
J
jbassman Offline OP
TFF Team Angler
OP Offline
TFF Team Angler
J
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,391
The fish did not count, we were asked to give the fish to live release tank. End of story.

Re: The 16" Under [Re: jbassman] #6000740 03/28/11 12:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 475
S
stinger13 Offline
Angler
Offline
Angler
S
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 475
I say if the game warden was not going to commit himself, then the tournament committee should have allowed the fish. They certainly shouldn't have much to say since they didn't have a courtesy board. If it would have gotten you a prize, I would consider getting representation. With so much at stake,including reputation, I might look for a piece of the tournament organization.

Last edited by waker; 03/28/11 12:41 PM.

Re: The 16" Under [Re: stinger13] #6000746 03/28/11 12:43 PM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 860
C
CTA Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
C
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 860
Thankfully the Game Warden used common sense and didn't write a citation.

Sorry to hear the fish didn't count, that must have been a buzz kill.

Re: The 16" Under [Re: stinger13] #6000756 03/28/11 12:47 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,267
T
tommyc Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
T
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,267
I saved this response from the Berkley tournament..

There are a lot of variables to measuring fish, especially on slot lakes. Different tournaments have different rules and some can be confusing. Some trails say the fish can touch the 16 inch line and others say they cannot touch 16.

If either side of the fish goes over the lower end of the slot, the fish is illegal. If either side of the fish touches the upper end of the slot, the fish is legal.

Some weigh masters only pinch the tail.

Some pinch the tail and fan tail

I have heard of them stroking the fish while on the board.

How much pressure is put on the fish while pushing against the board? Is enough pressure applied to consistently close the mouth completely?

Hard to tell how they are going to measure unless you are familiar how that particular Tournament does it. Even in the same circuit, different folks on the board can put variable pressure on the fish and make a difference. I remember RedSkeeter saying one time that I watch them like a hawk when they measure my fish. He does this because he wants to emulate how they measure when he is on the water.

ProRule, Check it Stick, Golden rule, others?..... I know the golden rule does not measure the same as the others, but I have found the ProRule and Check it Stick to be the same IMO. I make sure that I have the same board in the boat.

I have had them measured at 1/8 under and the fish be questioned or DQd. We have also had fish that measured under in the morning and then touching later in the day and had to chunk them back. Not a good feeling when you take time to measure again and then go back to 4 fish in the livewell. We measure the close ones again because I know they change. I have found unders to change up to 1/8 but the variance I have experienced the most is about 1/16 or 3/32. Knowing this, we like to shoot for 15 and 7/8th's.

Glad to hear that you all escaped the ticket.


Tom Cornelius

Romans 10:9-11



Re: The 16" Under [Re: stinger13] #6000758 03/28/11 12:47 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,767
JPeel Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,767
Originally Posted By: waker
....If it would have gotten you a prize, I would consider getting representation. With so much at stake,including reputation, I might look for a piece of the tournament organization.


Seriously?


the fisherman formerly known as Blu-Ranger....
Re: The 16" Under [Re: stinger13] #6000775 03/28/11 12:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,259
F M Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,259
Originally Posted By: waker
\I would consider getting representation. With so much at stake,including reputation, I might look for a piece of the tournament organization.


Which explains one of the many things wrong with our country that people are so quick to sue. I haven't read the rules but I'm sure they say somewhere in there that the decision of the tournament director is final.

Re: The 16" Under [Re: F M] #6000790 03/28/11 12:59 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 30,914
RedRanger Online Content
burro desagradable
Online Content
burro desagradable
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 30,914
Just another reason I don't fish Tournaments on Fork

Lets see who can catch the smallest big fish

Re: The 16" Under [Re: RedRanger] #6000813 03/28/11 01:06 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,391
J
jbassman Offline OP
TFF Team Angler
OP Offline
TFF Team Angler
J
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,391
THEY ALSO DID THIS-- (have heard of them stroking the fish while on the board.)

They were doing their job, no hard feelings, we thought it was under BUT we were wrong.



Last edited by jbassman; 03/28/11 01:12 PM.
Re: The 16" Under [Re: stinger13] #6000855 03/28/11 01:20 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,961
emorydog Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,961
Originally Posted By: waker
I say if the game warden was not going to commit himself, then the tournament committee should have allowed the fish. They certainly shouldn't have much to say since they didn't have a courtesy board. If it would have gotten you a prize, I would consider getting representation. With so much at stake,including reputation, I might look for a piece of the tournament organization.


That is the response of someone who is ignorant. Obama fan no doubt looking to sue rather than accept the findings of both parties calling the lengths. Being that there was a warning issued, then it was obvious the warden also found it too long. So then what is your grounds to "look for a piece of the tournament organization" First, the TPW findings have nothing to do with the tourney, the tourney staff likely called it long, and that is likely why the warden was involved. Second, there should not need to be a courtesy board, they tell you what board they use. If you use the flawed logic that all boards are differnet, then the bump board will also be different that the one they have at the scales. Good that there was only a warning, unless it was flagrant, "1/32" could easily happen.


weber
Re: The 16" Under [Re: RedRanger] #6000866 03/28/11 01:24 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,673
T
tx_basser Offline
TFF Team Angler
Offline
TFF Team Angler
T
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,673
Originally Posted By: RedRanger
Just another reason I don't fish Tournaments on Fork

Lets see who can catch the smallest big fish



I agree... don't understand the methodology to go find the biggest 15 7/8" fish around the lake.

Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3