texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Maximus6!, Spincast07, Leo66fish, BFR, Boknows0908
119065 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
hopalong 120,027
TexDawg 119,095
Bigbob_FTW 94,370
John175☮ 85,858
Pilothawk 83,239
Bob Davis 80,291
Mark Perry 71,823
Derek 🐝 68,272
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,035,945
Posts13,902,852
Members144,065
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #14969353 01/26/24 07:27 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 891
TexasTechliprip Offline
Pro Angler
Offline
Pro Angler
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 891
my 6.2 is garbage

2022 with 29K miles and I have blown the engine, new radiator and a boatload of other problems.

Service techs tell me these have been popping like crazy

I would already be in the 3.0 if they were not going to gut me on the trade


[Linked Image]
Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #14969981 01/27/24 12:24 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 13,627
Bandit 200 XP Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 13,627
I would be pissed if i had 6.2 to do that , sorry to hear that .


Triton 200 XP
200 Yamaha 0X66
Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #14972954 01/30/24 04:05 AM
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,214
L
Lone_Wolf Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
L
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,214
This pro is using the baby duramax as his tow vehicle...

Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax [Re: Jman] #14982522 02/09/24 01:51 AM
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,214
L
Lone_Wolf Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
L
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,214
...and a not so positive review

Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3